bearing blog


bear – ing n 1  the manner in which one comports oneself;  2  the act, power, or time of bringing forth offspring or fruit; 3 a machine part in which another part turns [a journal ~];  pl comprehension of one’s position, environment, or situation;   5  the act of moving while supporting the weight of something [the ~ of the cross].


  • Office and officeholder.

    As long as I’m commenting on the Sunday readings, let’s add some commentary on the Gospel.  The whole reading was Matthew 23:1-12, which has a LOT of stuff in it, but the part I thought most important is in verses 1-3:

    Then Jesus spoke to the crowds and to his disciples,

    saying, "The scribes and the Pharisees have taken their seat on the chair of Moses.
    Therefore, do and observe all things whatsoever they tell you, but do not follow their example. For they preach but they do not practice…."

    It’s a stunningly clear exhortation to distinguish between the office and the officeholder.

    There are applications in many situations:  religion, politics, the family, the military, even commerce.   Sticking with religion for the moment:  How many times have we heard corruption, hypocrisy, criminality among the hierarchy as an argument for why the Catholic Church cannot possibly be teaching the truth?  (It’s not just Catholics of course; cf. televangelists.) 

    Yes, there have been many bad priests.  Yes, bishops committed great wrongs.  Yes, we have had terribly corrupt Popes.  Doesn’t mean that what they taught was wrong.  Do and observe whatsoever they tell you even if they are hypocrites.  (One can, of course, point out that great and humble saints have taught the very same truths that are preached by the hypocrites.)

    When you run into someone, these days, who doesn’t practice what he preaches, conventional wisdom says he should conform his preaching to his practice.  Rarely is this the case.  Much more often, the hypocrite in question should conform his practice to his preaching. 

    Anyway, the Scripture passage is a reminder that the office deserves respect  — and in some cases obedience — even if the officeholder is contemptible. 


  • “Like a weaned child on its mother’s lap, so is my soul within me.”

    An image in the psalm for today, Psalm 131, sparked my interest.  The whole psalm is only three verses; here it is:

    A song of ascents. Of David.

    LORD, my heart is not proud; nor are my eyes haughty. I do not busy myself with great matters, with things too sublime for me.

    Rather, I have stilled my soul, hushed it like a weaned child. Like a weaned child on its mother’s lap, so is my soul within me.
    Israel, hope in the LORD, now and forever.

    That’s it.  So, what do you think about the "weaned child?"  Very interesting!  Why has the psalmist stilled his soul like a weaned child on its mother’s lap and not, say, like a nursing child on its mother’s lap?  While the mother’s lap is a place of comfort and happiness for any child, certainly a nursing child would be receiving even more comfort from its mother than a weaned child.

    Well, let’s see.  When you hear "weaned child" you should be thinking of a largish toddler or a smallish child, perhaps a three-year-old or a four-year-old.  My experience with three- and four-year-olds is that they can be VERY squirmy, more than many younger children.  But at the same time they are also (being older) beginning to be able to respond a little more to their parents’ requests. 

    Nursing children are indeed very easy to hush and to still; a child who is nursing is usually a quiet, calm child.  (Not always.  They can get into some amazing contortions when they have a mind to.  But often, nursing a child calms him immediately, and sometimes puts him right to sleep.  Right now, for instance, as I sat here blogging, I was nursing my youngest, and it took about 5 minutes for him to fall mouth-wide-open unconscious.)

    I’m thinking that the psalmist didn’t mean for us to imagine that his soul is idyllically still, that it is as easy to still his soul as it is for a nursing mother to offer her breast to still her nursling.    I’m thinking he meant us to imagine the mother’s effort to hush and still her weaned child.  It’s second nature to pop a nipple into a crying child’s mouth.  It can be a little tougher to help an older, weaned child to calm down.

    And a child who’s actually in the act of suckling is not likely to get upset again, at least not while at the breast.  But sometimes, stilling and hushing a weaned child is a sort of dance:  just when you get him to settle down and his breathing begins to be regular, suddenly the snuffling starts again and you’ve got to rock him even harder, hug even tighter.

    So that’s one possibility.  Perhaps that soul, only recently "proud" and "haughty" and "busy," took some effort to settle down, to hush and to still, like a weaned child on its mother’s lap.  Perhaps the psalmist knows that the soul won’t stay still for long; tantrums will, eventually, return, and he will have to settle it down again, by an act of will.

    There is another possibility in that word "weaned."  It could be meant to connote satisfaction or fulfillment — that the weaned child has drunk his fill from his mother’s breast.  He has been filled up for life. 

    But the first possibility seems to work better with the psalmist’s intent, which is to say — I think — that he has managed to quell (for now) worldly desires, pride, and the like, and found (for now) inner peace in the Lord.  What do you think?

    (Something else interesting:  The nursing mother appears in the second reading for today, 1 Thessalonians 2:7-9,13.  It goes like this:

    [W]e were gentle among you, as a nursing mother cares for her children.

    With such affection for you, we were determined to share with you not only the gospel of God, but our very selves as well, so dearly beloved had you become to us.

    Compare and contrast.  Our very selves as well.)


  • Ordaining married men.

    MrsDarwin considers the practical effect of opening the door to more widespread ordination of married men in the Roman rite, by looking at the "market" for Protestant clergy.

    In sum, Protestants do not have a clergy shortage. However, they do have a lot of churches without ministers…

    Liberal denominations have both a high vacancy rate (significantly higher, actually, than for Catholic parishes) and a lot of unemployed clergy.

    The problem seems to be that while there are a lot of ordained clergy, many of the openings are only marginably able to support a minister.  The P[resbyterian] C[hurch] USA reports that 50% of their vacant churches have congregations of less than 100 adults, many of whom offer salaries in the 20k range for ministers. Many of these are also in rural areas, making it difficult for a minister supported by his or her spouse’s job to fill the vacancy. Denominational polls of ordained Protestant clergy revealed very few were willing to go to rural areas, or in some cases to move at all, since in many cases they relied on a second job or a spouse’s career to support their families.

    Some good thoughts there.  Read the whole thing.  And it’s worth repeating a question in the comments from the great post that sent her off on this tangent:  where are all these married men so anxious to serve the church in ordained ministry?


  • Sick.

    Not very, just a little bug.  I am enjoined to stay in bed and rest, while Mark takes the kids out to picnic with friends.  Blogging may be exceptionally light, or exceptionally heavy, for a few hours.

    UPDATE.  I’m not so sick that I can’t host the Catholic Carnival this week!  Email your submissions to me at erinarlinghaus *cough* AT *cough cough* earthlink DOT net …


  • Cyril of Jerusalem.

    Part of a series.

    Cyril of Jerusalem (315-386) wrote around 347 a series of Catecheses for adults preparing to be received into the Church.   The whole series of Catecheses is very interesting to read.  What caught my eye was the description and instruction in the Liturgy of the Eucharist at Mass that appears in Lecture 23.

    It begins with a description of the rite of hand-washing, then the kiss or sign of peace, then the familiar call and response:  "Let us give thanks unto the Lord,"  "It is meet and right."  (Today in English we respond "It is right to give him thanks and praise.")    The "Holy, Holy, Holy" hymn is sung. 

    Then having sanctified ourselves by these spiritual Hymns, we beseech the merciful God to send forth His Holy Spirit upon the gifts lying before Him; that He may make the Bread the Body of Christ, and the Wine the Blood of Christ; for whatsoever the Holy Ghost has touched, is surely sanctified and changed.

    Prayers are said, again following a familiar pattern:

    for the common peace of the Churches, for the welfare of the world; for kings; for soldiers and allies; for the sick; for the afflicted; and, in a word, for all who stand in need of succour we all pray and offer this sacrifice.

    Then we commemorate also those who have fallen asleep before us, first Patriarchs, Prophets, Apostles, Martyrs, that at their prayers and intercessions God would receive our petition. Then on behalf also of the Holy Fathers and Bishops who have fallen asleep before us, and in a word of all who in past years have fallen asleep among us, believing that it will be a very great benefit to the souls, for whom the supplication is put up, while that holy and most awful sacrifice is set forth.

    The "Our Father" follows.  Cyril expounds at length on each petition of that "Prayer which the Saviour delivered to His own disciples."  Then Communion:

    After this ye hear the chanter inviting you with a sacred melody to the communion of the Holy Mysteries, and saying, O taste and see that the Lord is good. Trust not the judgment to thy bodily palate no, but to faith unfaltering; for they who taste are bidden to taste, not bread and wine, but the anti-typical Body and Blood of Christ.

    In approaching therefore, come not with thy wrists extended, or thy fingers spread; but make thy left hand a throne for the right, as for that which is to receive a King. And having hollowed thy palm, receive the Body of Christ, saying over it, Amen. So then after having carefully hollowed thine eyes by the touch of the Holy Body, partake of it; giving heed lest thou lose any portion thereof; for whatever thou losest, is evidently a loss to thee as it were from one of thine own members. For tell me, if any one gave thee grains of gold, wouldest thou not hold them with all carefulness, being on thy guard against losing any of them, and suffering loss? Wilt thou not then much more carefully keep watch, that not a crumb fall from thee of what is more precious than gold and precious stones?

    Then after thou hast partaken of the Body of Christ, draw near also to the Cup of His Blood; not stretching forth thine hands, but bending, and saying with an air of worship and reverence, Amen, hallow thyself by partaking also of the Blood of Christ. And while the moisture is still upon thy lips, touch it with thine hands, and hallow thine eyes and brow and the other organs of sense. Then wait for the prayer, and give thanks unto God, who hath accounted thee worthy of so great mysteries.

    It is almost astonishing to see how little the Mass, with the underlying beliefs in it, has changed in the 1,658 years that separate us from Cyril’s pen.   So much is the same, in the crucial core of the Eucharist, that almost any Catholic can respond with confidence and gratitude to Cyril’s closing admonition:

    Hold fast these traditions undefiled and, keep yourselves free from offence. Sever not yourselves from the Communion; deprive not yourselves, through the pollution of sins, of these Holy and Spiritual Mysteries.

    We are not severed, and we do hold these traditions fast.  At least, what’s good enough for 347 is good enough for me.

    And the God of peace sanctify you wholly; and may your spirit, and soul, and body be preserved entire without blame at the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ:–To whom be glory and honour and might, with the Father and the Holy Spirit, now and ever, and world without end. Amen.


  • Transsubstantiation as “metabole.”

    In the last few days the bloggers at Pontifications have posted a few theological excerpts on the topic of Transubstantiation.

    I like this, by Sergei Bulgakov:

    The bread and wine completely and wholly, without any limitations, become the salvific body and blood. It is, however, precisely the bread and wine that are transmuted, that is, not the qualityless, abstract matter of this world (”earth”), which does not even exist, but a specific type of this matter with qualities, namely bread and wine, which, as materials of this world, do not change but now belong not to themselves and not to this world but to Christ’s glorified, spiritual body.

    I think what he’s saying here is that at the consecration Christ takes up into his body the qualities of this specific bread and wine:  that the Body of Christ becomes larger, taking it in.

    The whole problematic of the theory of transsubstantiatio… flows … from the difficulty of explaining the transformation of one material into another material within the limits of cosmic being. But no transformation at all occurs… for only different things of one and the same natural world, not things that belong to different realms of being, can be transformed. Things that belong to different realms of being can only be transmuted the one into the other, while preserving their own mode of being in their own realm.

    I’m not really sure what the distinction is between "transformed" and "transmuted."  I think he’s saying that there’s no way an earthly chunk of bread can change in form to the supernatural body of Christ (that would be "transform"), but that it can change in reality or essential quality (that is, "transmute.")   Hmm.

    Bulgakov refers the Latinate word "transmute" to the Greek synonym metabole while he explores this concept.  It’s a neat choice, because he goes on to refer to metabolism in a very direct way:

    The fact that the body and blood in their earthly nature remain what they were has no significance here. As such, they have become other than themselves; they no longer have independent existence as things of this world but belong to the body of Jesus, in the same way that the bread and fish that He ate in the presence of His disciples belong to His body. The Lord, who in His spiritual and glorified body abides at the right hand of God the Father, creates, in the transmutation, a body for Himself from the bread, matter of this world, and animates it with His blood.

    I think this is a nifty way of grappling with the mystery.


  • The tree came down.

    Tree_removal_001

    Here it is:  a lovely, mature maple tree…

    .

    .

    Tree_removal_052 .

    …and here are my boys watching the big truck cart its branches away.

    .

    Tree_removal_102 .

    Leafless after only a few hours, it stands out against the midmorning sky.

    .

    Tree_removal_143.

    A deep notch is cut. 

    One worker runs across the yard to join the others in what will prove a very short game of tug-of-war.

    Tree_removal_152 Tree_removal_154 Tree_removal_157_3 Down… down… down.


  • St. John Chrysostom.

    Part of a series.

    "I can worship God better outside in nature than in a building."

    I have heard that line before, spoken by non-churchgoing folks.  It has never struck me as a good excuse (not that anyone owes me an excuse); indoor worship doesn’t exclude outdoor worship, and I wonder how much worshipping the speaker does outdoors at all.  Why not just say "No, I don’t go to church, I don’t like it?"  At least it would be honest.

    Today’s one-sentence selection tells why community worship is an important part of a balanced spiritual diet.

    You cannot pray at home as at church, where there is a great multitude, where exclamations are cried out to God as from one great heart, and where there is something more: the union of minds, the accord of souls, the bond of charity, the prayers of the priests.

    The writer is John Chrysostom (347-407), whose nickname ("Golden-Mouthed") reflects his reputation as a brilliant public speaker and preacher.   He wrote prolifically, and I hope to excerpt some more of his work.

    The sentence doesn’t denigrate the prayers offered in the home, alone or among family.  Family and private prayer in the home is good.  But it does point out two special qualities of worship in church.  Neither is conferred by the building.

    The first quality is rooted in the people gathered there for the purpose of worship.  That gathering is an act of worship in and of itself, because it exists solely as a worship community (unlike the family or the indvidual).

    The second quality comes from the ordained priests, who ordinarily preside at worship in church and are absent from private or family worship.  As this passage demonstrates, the Church has always understood the ordained priest as a special representative.   He "has something to offer" that most of the Christians do not, by virtue of his office and the sacrament of Orders he has received.   

    Private prayer is valuable; but corporate worship and sacramental worship are needed, too.


  • Photoshopping at USA Today.

    USA Today gets in the Halloween mood early by quietly turning Condoleeza Rice into a demon.

    Photojournalism just isn’t the same anymore, is it?

    UPDATE:  USA Today pulls the photo and publishes a retraction.  How much of this stuff did they get away with before blogs?  H/t Instapundit.


  • Papal headgear.

    From Andrew at Shrine of the Holy Whapping:

    Catholics of course have an inherent love for any custom which is both obscure and funny-looking.

    Scroll down to "As far as Papal headgear goes…" with the b&w picture.


  • Tip of the day.

    Don’t try to pick up Play-Doh with your left hand and eat gumdrops with your right.


  • The Platinum Rule.

    Mitchell at Our Word and Welcome To It posts on the new business buzzword, the "Platinum Rule:"

    "Treat others the way they want to be treated."

    Hmm, you’re thinking. It sounds kind of familiar, but there’s something just a little off, isn’t there?

    It’s a nice distinction, but no improvement on good old-fashioned gold.  All that glitters, indeed.  (H/t this week’s Catholic Carnival.)