bearing blog


bear – ing n 1  the manner in which one comports oneself;  2  the act, power, or time of bringing forth offspring or fruit; 3 a machine part in which another part turns [a journal ~];  pl comprehension of one’s position, environment, or situation;   5  the act of moving while supporting the weight of something [the ~ of the cross].


  • Coadjutor?

    The buzz is official, according to the Star Tribune:  Archbishop Flynn has asked Rome to appoint a coadjutor.  Essentially, that means a successor, one who starts work while Abp. Flynn is still in charge — I suppose to smooth the transition and to ease the workload on the archbishop in the years and months before he retires.

    Here’s the Strib articleHere’s the Hadleys’ take on it at OWAWTI

    I first heard that rumor over after-Mass pancakes the morning after the local Catholic bloggers’ get-together.   I won’t speculate.   I think the Hadleys have it right about the paper’s coverage (except that they gave the final quote a pass, the one where the professor from the St. Paul Seminary says that she hopes for an appointee who "doesn’t take strong ideological positions."  Cue the eye-rolling, please.)

    I’ve got nothing to add to this story for now…


  • Holyoffice does it again…

    The Da Vinci Code FAQ.

    Q: Is "The Da Vinci Code" fiction?
    A: No. It’s what I call "faction": Historically true facts interspersed with car chases. In the very first page of his masterpiece, Brown writes, "All descriptions of artwork, architecture, documents, and secret rituals in this novel are accurate."

    Q: Well, if it’s in a book, it must be true.
    A: Exactly…

    Q: Why isn’t any of this in the Bible?
    A: It is – but not the Bible the Man wants you to read! The truth uncovered by Brown is contained in scriptures like The Gospel of Thomas and The Secret Gospel of Oprah, works that depict the truth of Jesus’ humanity and marriage, despite being written several hundred years after the canonical gospels.

    Q: How do we know these non-canonical works are more accurate than the canonical ones?
    A: Because the people who regarded them as sacred came out on the losing end.

    Q: So, the fact that they were ultimately less popular and successful than the canonical gospels means they’re true?
    A: As Elaine Pagels explains it, yes.

    Q: So, in that case, is the "real" foundational document of the U.S. government actually the Articles of Confederation?
    A: Yes! I was just saying that to the President of Congress the other day.

    Read the whole thing.  Via Bettnet.

    UPDATE:  The comment threads are good too:

    What most people don’t know is the Gospel of John was originally written by John Woo.


  • Iron woman.

    Tired, tired, tired.  I’ve been telling Mark that I’m good for exactly three things over the course of the day:  1) I can make dinner.  2) I can make sure Oscar does his schoolwork.  3) I can perform exactly one other act of housekeeping.  After that, I’m done.  I’m sitting with my feet up and a big glass of red raspberry leaf tea and resting.  Last Saturday I went back to bed right after breakfast and slept until three o’clock.

    Last week when the midwife pricked my finger for the hemoglobin check, I took one look at the drop of blood, went pale and dizzy, and needed to lie down.  I’ve never reacted that way to the sight of blood before!  Precious, precious blood.  Turns out my hemoglobin measured just about 10 g/dL — normal levels in pregnancy are 11-12 g/dL.   I don’t think I’ve ever had such low iron.  Not surprising.

    Mark took the boys to the co-op and came back with packages of bright red steaks and bags of dried apricots and bunches of fresh spinach.  Also some liverwurst, and yellow mustard and crackers to eat it with.  And a bottle of Floradix.  I promised to eat some red meat and green leafy vegetables every day. 

    I feel better, after only a week.  Maybe the improvement’s all in my head.  Give me the strongest placebo you’ve got.  I’m still not doing more than one act of housekeeping a day, though.


  • More on c-sections’ effect on moms.

    Heart, Mind, and Strength Blog posted a link to the abstract of a study on maternal complications associated with primary and repeat cesarean sections.  The abstract has a sampling of the numbers:

    There were 6,201 first (primary), 15,808 second, 6,324 third, 1,452 fourth, 258 fifth, and 89 sixth or more cesarean deliveries.

    The risks of placenta accreta, cystotomy, bowel injury, ureteral injury, and ileus, the need for postoperative ventilation, intensive care unit admission, hysterectomy, and blood transfusion requiring 4 or more units, and the duration of operative time and hospital stay significantly increased with increasing number of cesarean deliveries.

    Placenta accreta was present in 15 (0.24%), 49 (0.31%), 36 (0.57%), 31 (2.13%), 6 (2.33%), and 6 (6.74%) women undergoing their first, second, third, fourth, fifth, and sixth or more cesarean deliveries, respectively.

    Hysterectomy was required in 40 (0.65%) first, 67 (0.42%) second, 57 (0.90%) third, 35 (2.41%) fourth, 9 (3.49%) fifth, and 8 (8.99%) sixth or more cesarean deliveries.

    In the 723 women with previa, the risk for placenta accreta was 3%, 11%, 40%, 61%, and 67% for first, second, third, fourth, and fifth or more repeat cesarean deliveries, respectively. 

    The authors conclude:  "Because serious maternal morbidity increases progressively with increasing number of cesarean deliveries, the number of intended pregnancies should be considered during counseling regarding elective repeat cesarean operation versus a trial of labor and when debating the merits of elective primary cesarean delivery." 

    That’s absolutely right.  And HMS Blog adds, "This says to me that it would be very worthwhile for maternity care providers to help women avoid that FIRST C-section."  Amen.

    The study is Silver et al., "Maternal Morbidity Associated with Multiple Repeat Cesarean Deliveries," Ob Gyn 107 1226-1232 (2006). 


  • Fair is fair. Or foul, as the case may be.

    After Mass I was sitting at the parish KofC pancake breakfast with my family and the Desperate Irish Housewife family, and (after a string of conversational turns that led up to it) Mark volunteered that my PhD experience was comparable to Macbeth.

    I turned on him.  You have never compared my graduate education to Macbeth before.

    I haven’t?

    Mr. Desperate Irish Housewife interjected:  I’ve heard people compare graduate school to Sisyphus before.

    I insisted, No!  I’ve never heard you say that in my life!

    Oh, well, I’ve thought it lots of times, he said.  Anyway, it’s like this:  Once you got in far enough, you had to see it through to the end.

    The bitter, bloody end, I take it, said I.

    Ha!  said Mr. Desperate Irish Housewife.  That’s perfect for a chemical engineer!  "Out, out damned spot!"

    See, it matches very well, said Mark.  All except the c-section part.

    Thanks.  Don’t wish that on me, I’m seven months pregnant.

    And then there’s all the paperwork at the end —

    Yes! said Mr. Desperate Irish Housewife.  The forests are marching upon you!  And — "bubble, bubble, toil and trouble!" Ha!   He stirred an imaginary cauldron.  How supportive you must have been, he said to Mark.

    Oh, I was very, very supportive, Mark said, pointing at me as if to stave off any protests.

    Supportive!  Like Lady Macbeth!  She was very supportive!  Ha!  said Mr. Desperate Irish Housewife. 

    We all know what happened to her, of course.


  • Chicken.

    A couple of weeks ago we were awakened around five in the morning by the cock’s crow.  And again the morning after that, and the morning after that.  I’m getting used to it now — I don’t think I’m noticing it at 5 AM anymore — but the rooster in the yard of the neighbor across the street crows from time to time all day long.  I don’t mind it.  Actually, it’s kind of cool, and the kids love it.

    I don’t know if you knew this, but in Minneapolis it’s legal to raise chickens in your backyard.  Here’s an April article from a local publication:

    Growing up in New Prague, Minn., Willcütt kept not only chickens but rabbits, geese, and a pet goat. When he moved to Nicollet Island, he says, “I thought my chicken days are over.”

    But what Willcütt didn’t know was that his new neighbors, Leslie Ball and Phyllis Kahn, had been talking for years, says Ball, about “how we wanted to use wind power and grow our own food, keep chickens for their eggs.” According to Ball, Willcütt overheard one of these conversations “and transformed our entire life.” The three of them (along with husbands and partners) now cooperatively keep a coop of 25 hens and one rooster. “I can’t say enough about how much it’s transformed my life,” says Ball. “I’m honored that I get to live with these gorgeous chickens.”

    Willcütt, in fact, would like to see more people keep chickens. “If you’re a busy urban professional,” he says, “chickens can still come into your life.”

    We’re pretty accustomed to buying eggs directly from a farm, a nice way to get them from free-range, organically-fed hens at a lower cost than the co-ops charge.   I’ve thought often that it would be a fun project for the kids, when they’re older, to raise a few chickens for their eggs.   

    And we’d fit right into the neighborhood.  In the Powderhorn area of South Minneapolis, where I live, it’s fairly common to see a hen or two scratching in someone’s backyard.  I think that it’s grown more widespread as the neighborhood has become home to more and more Latino families.  Fine by me:  a chicken eating bugs in an urban backyard is probably a much happier chicken than a chicken living among thousands of others in a metal barn with a door at one end.

    But this is the first time I’ve heard a rooster!  I found out from another neighbor — the one who lives next door to the rooster-owning family — that they have three roosters and one hen, which seems like an odd ratio to me, but that explains why we hear quite so much crowing.   She said she adopted one of the hens for herself, and that her son (who’s maybe four years old) really loves her.   The hen I mean.  I think their hen is the one that was pecking the dirt in our own back yard the other day.  Since their family, and the hen, lives on the other side of the street, I keep wondering why.

    (pause while that sinks in)

    There are some legal hoops to jump through.  You need a Small Animal Permit to keep chickens in your back yard.  It’s not expensive — $10 per year — but to get it, you must pass an inspection of the premises and get the consent of 80% of the neighbors who live within 100 feet.

    Hm.  Nobody ever asked my permission.  And Laura (the adoptive owner of the aforementioned hen) didn’t say anything about a permit.  Could it be that my neighborhood is full of…. undocumented chickens?

    Well, fault me if you will, but I won’t be turning them in, provided the chickens continue to appear fat, healthy, and well-cared for.  My husband grew up among farmers.  I like the sound of a rooster crowing in the morning.  My kids, especially Milo-the-avian-obsessed, are absolutely thrilled when a hen appears in our yard.  And who knows, maybe someday we’ll want to raise them ourselves.  I wonder how many hens I would need to produce our two and a half dozen eggs a week?



  • Alleys.

    Minneapolis is reviewing a proposal to bar people from alleys unless they live on the block:

    The proposal would prohibit anyone from walking in an alley who doesn’t live on that block or who isn’t a guest of someone who does. Police, paramedics and firefighters would be exempt, as would garbage haulers, meter readers, code inspectors and others whose jobs take them there….

    "I see so much crime occurring in the alleys. It’s a quick getaway," said Minneapolis police officer Mike Killebrew.

    "If you don’t live there on that block there’s no reason to be in the alley," said Killebrew, who proposed the ordinance to the city attorney. …

    Any move to make walking in alleys illegal is likely to anger some people.

    On a sun-rich Friday afternoon, Gordon Anderson walked down the paved alley on the 3400 block of Lyndale Avenue S. He said he has lived on the block for 20 years and that everyone in the neighborhood walks down alleys.

    "That’s the stupidest thing I’ve ever heard," he said. "The whole country seems to be going to the Soviet Union, I’ll tell you that."

    Mr. Anderson would be allowed to walk down his own alley under the proposed ordinance, just not the one on the next block over.

    People walk down our alley all the time, mostly people I don’t recognize.  Lots of teenagers, lots of kids wearing school backpacks.  And there are others I don’t see but who leave their traces:  graffiti speckles the garage doors year round.  Sometimes someone takes a leak against a garage (I apologize if you think that’s crude, but really, if you pee on someone’s garage doesn’t it deserve a crude term?)  There’s also a couple of regulars who pick cans out of recycling bins (technically illegal but frankly, it doesn’t bother me). 

    When I was in grade school, I regularly walked down the alley to get home from the school bus stop.  The alley seemed much more interesting, to a kid, than the sidewalks.  There was a lot of gravel to kick, for one thing, and a few walls to walk on, and you could see into the neighbors’ back yards and talk to their dogs through the Cyclone fence.  And you could pick mulberries in the weedy patch.  I particularly remember a gap in the bushes that led to a great secret hiding spot behind somebody’s woodpile.  It was shaded by a canopy of branches and sheltered on three sides by foliage, on the fourth by the stack of logs (which nobody, apparently, ever burned).  I wonder if that spot is still there and if kids still hide in it.  Almost every time I’m back in Ohio I am tempted to drive down that alley and peek through the gap in the bushes.  I’d probably get arrested, though.   

    Our block was triangular, so the alley was winding and branched.  Compare that to the alleys in Minneapolis, which run straight north and south, each one bisecting a block.  Almost everyone has a fence — a tall one — so there’s nothing to see except fences, garage doors, and garbage cans.   Since the alley is straight and parallel to the streets, there’s not much reason to walk down the alley.  It’s almost never a shortcut.  I can understand why kids like it, and the can-pickers, but why do so many teenagers and adults prefer the alley to the sidewalk?   


  • “August of ’78.”

    Say a prayer for Doug Wrenn, that writing this piece will help him to accept the forgiveness he’s already received.

    Via After Abortion.


  • Is it absurd to approach the priest and ask for anonymous confession?

    Commenter Patrick Laws asks a good question, apropos this post about face-to-face confessions, in which I noted that either priest or penitent has the right under canon law to insist on anonymous (behind the screen) confessions:

    Does anyone else recognize the absurdity of the notion of a penitent approaching his priest and insisting on "anonymous" confession?

    Depends how he approaches the priest. He might call anonymously for a confession by appointment and ask to meet the priest in the confessional rather than in the foyer, or in the office, or whatever.

    Or someone — perhaps a woman or child — might insist on using the confessional rather than the priest’s office, not for anonymity, but because of feeling that it’s inappropriate or even risky to meet any man, priest or no, alone in his office.

    Thirdly, some people feel more comfortable behind the screen. (Not that confession has to be comfortable — but some people have an easier time opening up and making a complete confession.)  Even if the priest knows who you are, it’s perfectly reasonable to ask to use a confessional, assuming there’s one available. Anonymity isn’t the only reason for the screen — which is why I added "(behind the screen)" as a parenthesis to describe the kind of confession that either priest or penitent is allowed to seek.


  • Spanish.

    I’ve been thinking a lot lately about Spanish — teaching it to the kids, that is.  There’s so much material available for Spanish speakers, and we live in a heavily Spanish-speaking part of town.  It’s the obvious language to do, if we’re going to do a foreign language at all.

    Problem:  I don’t know Spanish.

    I’d like to learn, though.   I wonder if we could learn it together as a family?

    I’m not happy with the "complete curricula" I’ve seen.  Frankly, I’m spoiled.  I studied French off and on in elementary school, took four years in high school, and got a minor in college.  I had excellent teachers, and my high school education in French was very traditional and rigorous:  lots of vocabulary drills, copywork, and translation; journal writing; classes taught mostly in French after the first year.  I keep expecting to be able to find something out there for kids to learn Spanish that reminds me of what I had as a high school student (albeit written for a third- or fifth- grade level).  Haven’t found it.  I am really disappointed, so far, in what’s available for homeschoolers. 

    I was a bit tempted to pick up the classroom curriculum that’s used by our parish school, which does Spanish in grades K-6, for no other reason than that I know the other curricula they use are extremely high quality and tend to the classical/traditional style (Saxon Math, for instance, and the Faith and Life series of religion texts from Ignatius Press.)  It’s Viva El Espanol, a McGraw-Hill series.    Unfortunately, it appears to come with a bunch of classroomy educational crap, like an octopus puppet.  Also the descriptions are full of edspeak, like "The Total Physical Response Storytelling (TPRS) technique is now a part of lessons!" Whatever that means.  I don’t suppose I could get away with just using a textbook, or maybe a text plus a teachers’ edition.

    I suppose I could start the way I started in French, with a boatload of vocabulary drills.  I remember how helpful the vocabulary drill was back in high school — the eighth-grade "pre-French" year consisted of almost nothing but vocabulary drill and a little bit of conversational stuff.  A bit tedious at times, but having all those vocabulary words at hand really helped when it was time to learn grammar in ninth grade.   Technically, all I need for that is a good dictionary and a stack of 5 x 8 index cards — picture on the front, Spanish word on the back.  I found this website that sells access, $30 for six months, to downloads of 2000 or so clip-art type flash cards.  So for $30 plus the cost of printing and filing I could have a starter kit of 2000 vocabulary words.  It’s hard to beat that.   I tried — there’s lots of "English/Spanish" flash card sets out there, but just about all of them have English words on the front and Spanish on the back (no good for teaching nonreaders — and anyway, forces the learner to "translate" rather than to think in the new language) or English words on the back, Spanish words and pictures on the front. 

    So suppose we spend a couple of years just working on vocabulary.  I bet the kids would enjoy learning the Spanish names for colors, animals, various verbs, conversational phrases, and so on.  Maybe during that time a   decent Spanish curriculum for homeschoolers will come along.  In the meantime we can supplement with various videos, multimedia stuff, and the like.  Still, I wish some publisher somewhere would read my mind and put together a program exactly like the one I imagine using in my head.   I just finished phonics — I don’t want to design my own Spanish program unless I absolutely have to! 


  • Good Samaritans apparently don’t make it to the summit of Mt. Everest.

    More than 40 climbers passed a dying man on Mount Everest last week.  A few offered some assistance but all, essentially, left him to die.

    David Sharp, 34, died while descending from the summit during a solo climb last week, apparently of oxygen deficiency.

    More than 40 climbers are thought to have seen him as he lay dying, and almost all continued to the summit without offering assistance.

    It’s a risky endeavor, no doubt.  But that doesn’t excuse the ones who passed him.

    New Zealander Mark Inglis, who became the first double amputee to reach the mountain’s summit on prosthetic legs, told Television New Zealand that his party stopped during its May 15 summit push and found Sharp close to death.

    A member of the party tried to give Sharp oxygen and sent out a radio distress call before continuing to the summit, he said. …

    Inglis said Sharp had no oxygen when he was found. He said there was virtually no hope that Sharp could have been carried to safety…His own party was able to render only limited assistance and had to put the safety of its own members first, Inglis said Wednesday.

    Had to put the safety of its own members first eh?   That might be plausible if you had been on your way down.  Not so plausible when you’re still going up.

    "I walked past David but only because there were far more experienced and effective people than myself to help him," Inglis said.

    Who was he expecting to help him, the Mount Everest Ski Patrol?

    A decent person, even knowing he couldn’t get David off the mountain, might have stayed at his side.  At least then he wouldn’t have died alone.