bearing blog


bear – ing n 1  the manner in which one comports oneself;  2  the act, power, or time of bringing forth offspring or fruit; 3 a machine part in which another part turns [a journal ~];  pl comprehension of one’s position, environment, or situation;   5  the act of moving while supporting the weight of something [the ~ of the cross].


  • Deaths from sexually transmitted disease.

    Eugene Volokh points to this (information re-ordered):

    An interesting article, S.H. Ebrahim, M.T. McKenna & J.S. Marks, Sexual Behaviour: Related Adverse Health Burden in the United States, Sexually Transmitted Infections, vol. 81, pp. 38-40 (2005), reports that sexually transmitted diseases were responsible for nearly 30,000 deaths in the U.S. in 1998.

    A third of the deaths were among women, and two thirds among men.

    Three quarters of the deaths were from HIV, but nearly 5000 were from cervical cancer, which seems to be generally caused by some strains of human papilloma virus, and nearly 2000 were caused by sexually transmitted hepatitis and hepatitis-caused liver cancer. (The study purported to take into account the fact that not all hepatitis is sexually transmitted.)

    There were also over 100 deaths from syphilis and fewer than 10 from gonorrhoea (presumably from the very rare gonorrhoea-caused heart disease), but apparently modern antibiotics have done a great deal to limit death and serious illness caused in the U.S. by bacterial sexually transmitted diseases.

    …By way of comparison, there were about 44,000 car accidents, a titch over 30,000 suicides, a little under 18,000 homicides, and a bit over 30,000 total firearms deaths (including suicides, homicides, and the few accidents). …

    The study also reported that sexually transmitted disease causes some 600,000 cases of infertility per year (overwhelmingly among women); and of course hepatitis, cervical cancer, liver cancer, and HIV can be quite painful and disabling even when they don’t cause death.

    The comments are… interesting.   A lot of people get very defensive about this news and seem to care about it only insofar as it fits in with their beliefs about education policy.

    A side note:  I do not believe it reflects on Eugene personally, and the VC is one of my favorite blogs, but Ann Althouse attracts, generally, much smarter and wittier commenters.



  • “I could never stay home full time. Locked in the house all day with two kids? No way.”

    Possible answers:

    1.   Oh come ON.  That’s ridiculous.

    2.  Yes, that’s exactly what it’s like.  My husband chains the door every morning when he leaves from work and lets me out when he gets home.  It’s like that all over the block:  women with their noses pressed up against the glass.

    3.  Take your pick.  You can be locked in the house, or your children can be locked in an institution.

    4.  Yes.  Isolation can be a real problem.  But it can be overcome.  I have a wonderful network of friends who also care for their own children, and the time we spend together has pretty much eliminated all sense of being "locked in."   If you are willing to reach out to other mothers, so that you plug into a wider community, well, it’s really a very balanced and healthy existence.

    Guess what I said.  Guess what I wish I’d said.


  • Exactly how weird are we?

    There was  this conversation I had with Mark before we got married.  While we were engaged.   It contained a significant exchange (who said what isn’t important):

    I know you love me.  But if you ever fall out of love with me — if you ever don’t love me anymore — will you promise you still will be married to me?

    Yes.  Will you stay with me, too, even if you fall out of love with me?

    Yes.  I do love you.  But I will stay married to you even if some day I don’t.

    So what I’m wondering is — do other people in love, engaged couples, have this conversation?  Or is it all pledges of undying love? 

    What do you mean, `if I fall out of love with you?’  I am never going to fall out of love with you.  Never.  So don’t worry about that.

    Because, well, that wouldn’t have been good enough for me.  Or for Mark either.  And I really don’t think that anyone should settle for undying love.

    I’d like to think that everyone who’s planning marriage has the same conversation.  But I worry that they don’t.


  • “Could you not keep watch for one hour?”

    Today at Mass, our priest and a few parishioners put out a call for volunteers.  We have a few empty spots in the weekly Eucharistic Adoration schedule. 

    We’re going to do it:  Mark and I decided to commit to one hour a week between us.  We asked to be given either 5 a.m., 6 a.m., or 7 a.m. on a week day.  The kids are sleeping then.  We figure that we can take turns, and that on Mark’s turn he can just leave from there to go to work, while on my turn I can make it back in time for him to leave from work. 

    When we needed to find a new parish, I started with a list of local parishes that keep perpetual-adoration chapels (do it yourself here).  We planned to work down the list in order of distance from our house, but we fell in love with the nearest one, and that’s where we joined.  I had hoped that the Eucharist exposed twenty-four hours a day would be the sign to us of a parish with great love and reverence for the Lord’s body and blood.  And so it is.

    You can read here about the history of this practice.  Basically, our parish keeps a tiny chapel unlocked 24 hours a day, with access to a bathroom but not to the rest of the church.  (The chapel can be locked from the inside.)  Inside the chapel are about a dozen chairs and a couple of kneelers. 

    Monstrance179x288 At the front hangs a crucifix on the wall and below it on a marble table is a monstrance, also called an ostensorium.  This is a stand specially made to display the Blessed Sacrament.  A host consecrated at the most recent Mass is placed in the center opening.

      This Host is the source of our spiritual life, as the sun is the source of our biological life, so "the most appropriate form [of the monstrance] is that of the sun emitting its rays to all sides."

    .

    .

    In order to maintain a perpetual adoration chapel, volunteers must be present at all times.  We cannot leave the Lord’s Body and Blood unsupervised; it may seem strange, but there are indeed people who would harm this small white Host.  So we require around three hundred volunteers: most to commit to stay with Him a weekly hour, some to serve as substitutes.   Most of the slots are filled, but the middle of the night can be hard to fill up.  I suppose that some of the adorers are doing double and triple duty to keep the chapel open until more folks volunteer.

    What do you do in front of the Sacrament?  Some meditate, some pray, some read Scripture, some just sit in God’s presence.  I try, whenever I am driving in the neighborhood, to stop in, even for a few minutes.   

    I bring my children in every once in a while.   I usher them into this tiny room where one or two people sit or kneel quietly.  They know to kneel down when we first go in.  Oscar, age five, knows that this is a special chapel and an especially good place to pray.  He stands on one of the kneelers and whispers intently, his brow furrowed.   When he is done, after just a few minutes, we get up and quietly, quietly, slip out. 

    I don’t dare stay longer; I want to take them out before they have had enough.  I want them to remember only the Eucharist in its golden throne, reverence and silence, and being trusted and allowed as children to enter this important-feeling, grown-up feeling, special place.  Neither has ever misbehaved in the chapel.

    My times in the chapel are always so short.  I am looking forward to having a whole hour to spend before Him, twice a month.  I am thrilled that my husband will be doing the same.   


  • And the cashier washes her hands between each piece of fruit.

    Today we stopped at a franchise of a national chain of certified-organic grocery stores to pick up bananas and nuts.

    Prints02_milobday_011

    Click to enlarge and read the sign on the conveyor belt.

    I’m sure the cashier is overjoyed whenever anyone asks.  The people waiting in line, too.


  • Milo is two.

    Milo turned two on Friday.  We went to the Como Zoo.  Here he is watching the polar bear:

    Prints02_milobday_004  .

    .

    .

    Milo loves birds, so I made him a bird cake.  No sculpture for me; Prints02_milobday_002 I work mainly in buttercream.

    I made a standard yellow layer cake recipe, with plenty of egg yolks and no egg white.  Halving the recipe yielded enough batter for a single eight-inch-square layer.  (My family of four doesn’t need a bigger one.)

    For the first time, I tried using 100% whole wheat pastry flour. We liked it!  It had a firmer, more substantial crumb than a white-flour cake, and a nuttier flavor, almost like corn bread.  It took the chocolate buttercream icing beautifully.  I reserved some icing before adding the chocolate and piped it onto the cake in the shape of a bird (species uncertain, but it looks gooseish to me).  Then I added yellow food coloring to the bag and gave it a beak and feet. 

    ..

    Prints02_milobday_005   Milo liked the cake.

    .


  • Causing problems for yourself.

    DarwinCatholic responds to my post on complaining about your children.  Maybe you can complain your way into problems:

    As the drama prof pounded into my head when I took acting back in college, the best way to get yourself to feel an emotion is to take on the external characteristics of that feeling…

    Watching the people at work who constantly complain about their spouses, or some of the couple we know who complain about their kids, I can’t help wondering if complaining about something in order to have something in common to commiserate about can often as not create resentment where it didn’t before exist.

    It’s plausible.



  • Blogging bearings.

    When I first started blogging, soon after I went home, I named my blog Re-engineering and planned it to chronicle my transition: from the career I’d planned in academia, to the part-time work-from home one I would be cobbling together.  For fun I would comment on science and tech in the news.  I congratulated myself for giving my blog such a clever name.

    After a little while I found that I didn’t actually want to write anything in Re-engineering, at all.  I went days without posting.  I told myself that I was too busy.  Eventually I had to admit that Re-engineering was boring.

    But I had already paid for many more months of Typepad.  So I deleted everything I’d written and renamed my blog, and now I look forward to posting.  I wake up in the middle of the night and make mental notes about something or other I should blog about (of course, I never remember them in the morning).    

    What’s the difference?  I didn’t stop writing about engineering.  One thing I like about Bearing Blog is that I still write about technology — it’s part of my makeup by this time — but under the new name I have permission to let it be a part of me, not the focus of my entire life.   And I do enjoy writing about engineering, mathematics and the like, much more than I enjoyed it when I tried to make it my whole blog.   You’ll see it represented up there in the masthead (scroll up), as definition number three.  This was, in fact, the definition of bearing that inspired the name.  I originally wanted to make the title a pun on the term "journal bearing."  But I didn’t think most people would get it.

    The other definitions of bearing have turned out to occupy much more of my attention:

    bear – ing n.

    1. the manner in which one comports oneself;
    2. the act, power, or time of bringing forth offspring or fruit;
    3. a machine part in which another part turns [a journal ~ ];
    4. pl comprehension of one’s position, environment, or situation;
    5. the act of moving while supporting the weight of something [the ~ of the cross].

      I no longer think myself clever for having come up with a good blog name.  Instead I am grateful that my first idea, a bit too obscure for most, led me so unexpectedly to a collection of concepts that I can mine endlessly for material that’s fun to write. 

    And the funny thing is, these days, bearing seems as good an organizational concept for my life’s work as any. 

    • I have a character of my own, a bearing, to develop and improve. 
    • I am a mother, laboring to bring forth my offspring (and a laborer more generally, hoping my works are fruitful). 
    • I want to get my bearings, that is, both knowledge and correct perspective.  Also I’d like to give it to everyone else. 
    • I am a Christian: I participate in the bearing of the cross. 
    • And because you can take the engineer out of engineering, but you can’t take the engineering out of the engineer, I can’t resist the machine-part analogy:

    I am a part of the Machine, of the System of the World.*  But where some might say we are all cogs,  I say that at least some of us are bearings, supporting weight, cushioning blows, transmitting forces, smoothing the paths of all traveling parts, turning and turning each in our own races, all of us levitating on and enveloped by and anointed in a sheen too fine to see.  That grease comes in from the outside, injected by some invisible technician or watchmaker; but in the end it’s the small bearings that transmit the supply from part to part.  More than any other part, we need it to do our job, and our job is to pass it on to whatever parts are nearest.

    The title of a blog does turn out to be significant, and not just because it’s the name of the link that readers might or might not click on.   Giving it a lot of thought, making it the perfect name for what I wanted to do, didn’t work for me.  Instead, I let my name-impulse guide what the blog was to become.  Something to think about, all you newbies.

    _____________________

    *With apologies to Isaac Newton and Neal Stephenson.


  • I give you permission to tell me how much you enjoy your kids.

    Amy Welborn linked to this wonderful opinion piece in the Guardian, by a mother with four children under two (she had triplets) who is — gasp! — enjoying her children:

    No one wants to hear that we are having a lovely time with our babies, who have started to smile all at once this week, and are sleeping in blissful four-hour chunks all of a sudden, and are so bright-eyed and lively after their bath that we feel like cracking open a bottle of champagne just to give them the party they seem to be up for. It’s not what people want. They want to hear how dreadful we feel, how exhausted and depressed we are, how it’s the worst thing that could ever happen to anyone, ever.

    She hits it right on the head —  already I hear this kind of remark from people when they see me out with my five-year-old and two-year-old boys.  Two children — two! — and daily it seems I hear "Wow, you’ve got your hands full" from cashiers and the like.

    I don’t understand what it is that makes people constantly denigrate their own young children, sometimes in earshot, sometimes not (he really keeps me on my toes *eye roll*)  (she has been driving me crazy with that thing today)  (more kids? oh gosh no I can barely handle *these two* as it is)  (oh my god I can’t wait until school starts).   I know people must love their kids, but it’s as if it is unseemly to admit it. 

    And if you’re allowed to admit delight in your children, you aren’t allowed to delight in the experience of parenthood of young children.  New mothers are allowed some oohing and aahing, but still we expect, after a couple of weeks, that the story is we’re coping, we’ll survive, not — this is amazing, I can’t believe we waited so long, every day she takes my breath away, I could just hold him and hold him all day long. 

    Is this — "isn’t parenthood a drag" — just acceptable small talk, like complaining about the weather?  (Then maybe that explains it, because I never could get the hang of small talk.)  Or is it true that most people really don’t like it?  If so, why is their experience so different from mine?

    Because I love my kids.  I love throwing myself into the mothering life, every morning.  I can’t even call it "work!"  It’s too much fun.  Yes, I have rough days from time to time.  But I’m the grownup — it’s not like it’s their fault if I spend a whole morning stomping about grumpy.  (Maybe when they’re older.)  Most of my days, I have a wonderful time. 

    I’m happy!  I loved being pregnant, giving birth (yes) and having tiny babies who nursed all night and all day.  I want more kids.  That makes so much sense to me on a gut level that, e.g.,  when I heard a young pregnant mother say to another last week in the kids’ music class, This is the last, we’re done after this one:  my first impulse was to feel terribly sad for her, to say with all the sympathy I can muster Oh, I’m so very sorry,  because my first thought was that some tragedy must have befallen her family, like horrible postpartum depression or complete financial ruin, that forced her to renounce childbearing.

    This happens a lot.  Usually I come to my senses in time, and remember, Oh yes, more than one or two children just isn’t ‘done’ anymore.   But I still cannot imagine that.  What a poverty to feel that one must say, No, to babies.  Maybe it’s better, maybe worse, to actually not want them.   

    I wonder about all the couples who long to conceive and bear children and literally can’t. What is it like for them to hear friends complaining about the babies they have, and paying good money to have their sleek, smooth, glisteningly healthy tubes sliced and cauterized, their abundant seed diverted and thrown away? 

    But most days I feed the children breakfast, I do some shopping, I teach Oscar to read, I take them for a walk, I listen and watch and smile.  Milo turned two yesterday, and I gave him a little box of plastic figurines of birds.  He lined them up on the table, put them back into the box, carried them around, lined them up on the table again.  Bird bird, he said over and over.  This morning I left him with Mark so I could take the computer to the coffee shop, and when he said to me I go, I said, You and Daddy can play with your birds.  As I quietly opened the door and headed down the stairs I heard him:  Bird bird Daddy.  Bird bird.

    I like my Saturday mornings, breakfast out alone with a book, the coffee shop with my computer, my little weekly retreat.  But every week I almost can’t wait to get back.


  • The wages of sin is tilth.

    Dinner has been served. Grace has been said.

    Mark, spooning up helpings of fish and potatoes: “Quite often, when I sit down to dinner, I am thankful that we can afford to pay people to provide us with a variety of good food. People worked in dangerous conditions for many hours to bring us this fish. People toiled in the hot sun so that we could have these potatoes.”

    Oscar: “We know who brought us the peppers. Grandpa did.”

    Me: “Yes! Grandpa toiled to grow the peppers for us.”

    Mark: “No, that doesn’t count. You don’t toil when it’s a hobby farm.”

    Me: “Good point. Grandpa probably enjoys growing the peppers.”

    Mark: “Unless he secretly hates growing peppers. And the hobby farm is actually some kind of harsh, self-imposed penance.”

    Me, considering the twenty-three acres: “Hmmm. That would explain a lot.”

    Mark: “The problem is that it then raises a few more questions, wouldn’t you think?”