bearing blog


bear – ing n 1  the manner in which one comports oneself;  2  the act, power, or time of bringing forth offspring or fruit; 3 a machine part in which another part turns [a journal ~];  pl comprehension of one’s position, environment, or situation;   5  the act of moving while supporting the weight of something [the ~ of the cross].


  • McMansions cost a lot to heat, apparently.

    The Star Tribune has a pretty good article on the disappointment of folks who now have to pay through the nose to heat their gigantic suburban houses:

    Eight years ago, Holly and Mark Batton built their 4,600-square-foot house in the rolling countryside of Credit River Township south of the Twin Cities.

    They saw their home, with its swimming pool and five bathrooms, as an investment they could enjoy as its value rose in fast-growing Scott County.

    The Battons belong to a generation of Americans who are living life larger than ever. Now, with energy prices driving up the cost of everyday life, they are also among a generation that is suddenly wondering if they’ve gone too far in pursuit of the good life…

    The Battons’ house, with a tax-assessed value of nearly $600,000, is merely of average size in Scottview Estates.

    In the Twin Cities and the surrounding suburbs, the home prices have been rising steeply for a number of years.  This is not just a pathological need to keep up with the Joneses, nor just conspicuous consumption, nor just the American taste for debt and distaste for savings.  Like it or not, there has been a strong economic incentive to build or buy the biggest home you possibly can, because everything is going up, fast.   So it isn’t as simple as "silly you, you bought more house than you need, you wasted your money."  People see these houses as something to invest in, for fast equity-building and profit. 

    Let me tell you a story of three  married couples I know.   In 2000 Mrs. A. was in graduate school and Mr. A. had just taken an engineering job.  Mr. and Mrs. O were both in graduate school, eking along on their two stipends.  Mr. T. was a grad student and Mrs. T. a stay-at-home mom, eking along on one (generous as stipends go) stipend. 

    The A’s said to each other, "Let’s not buy a house yet.  We haven’t time for the upkeep, we don’t want to have too much space or we’ll start acquiring a bunch of junk, married student housing is subsidized and so it’s a terrific deal, and we can both take the bus every day.  Besides," said Mr. A., "when my parents were first married they had to live in the attic above Grandma and Grandpa’s house.  We should be happy with what we have." 

    The O’s decided to buy a cozy little house in "Nordeast" Minneapolis the minute they decided to get married.     The T’s, while they were still living many states away, bought a tiny condominium in St. Paul without having had the chance to really explore their options.  "Too bad for them," thought Mr. and Mrs. A.  "Married student housing is such a great deal."

    Several years later, when the A’s finally got around to shopping for a house and were fainting at the prices of semi-run-down inner-city duplexes, the T’s and the O’s sold their respective dwellings at large profit.  In particular, the T’s condominium sold for nearly twice what they had paid for it.

    Do Mr. and Mrs. A wish they’d bought more house than they needed?  You bet your sweet bottom we do.  We might have sent a kid to college on the profits!

    ANYWAY.  That’s just a bit of local color.  The thing that people forgot is that big houses aren’t just a capital outlay; they have operating cost.   And that scales with energy costs.  And  conspicuous consumption is part of the problem.  But some of this is just because it actually appeared to make economic sense.

    Houses are still ridiculously overpriced.  Take a look at what $700,000 to $800,000 buys you in this town.  In particular, look at 2011 Fremont Avenue South.  It’s well-equipped, but… is it that well-equipped?  Do I live in San Francisco or something?


  • Sign me up, NOW.

    For the Society for a Moratorium on the Music of Marty Haugen and David Haas.

    The comments are amusing.  Here is a selection:

    I have been forcefed that abominable music for as long as I have been Catholic. It’s like the Care Bears’ Mass.

    Can we add Dan Schutte and Bernadette Farrell to the list too? And does anyone else think that "Gather Us In" was ripped off from the "Wreck of the Edmund Fitzgerald"?

    It’s not enough to be a member, all you church musicians out there! You have to NOT do this music at Mass, no matter what the liturgist tells you! You know who you are! I see your name on the list!

    I don’t know who "wrote" it, but did you ever notice that the tune to "Here I am Lord" is eerily like that of the Brady Bunch theme song?

    Maybe the Vatican will institute the Holy Office for the Inquisition of Really, Really, Really Bad Liturgical Music.

    As if that weren’t enough, there are parodies.  Everybody now, one two three!

    A Ditty to God (after Dan Schutte’s The City of God)

    Awake from your slumber, arise from your sleep;
    The homily’s over, it wasn’t too deep.
    He spoke of a ‘journey’, well, what else does he say?
    We’re all part of a ‘story’ as we go on our way.

    So let’s sing a ditty to God,
    It’s a way we can all be together.
    And we’ll be the City of God
    If we tell his story once more…

    And:

    Here I Am, Lord

    Here I am, Lord,
    I’ve got your pizza,
    And it’s only fourteen-ninety-five.
    Extra cheese, Lord,
    With pepperoni,
    And a little bag of peppers on the side.

    And:

    Gather Us In

    Here in this place, our comfortable parish,
    All of the statues carried away,
    See in each face a vacuous visage,
    Brought here by guilt or by R.C.I.A.

    Gather us in, by Bimmer or Hummer,
    Gather us in, so we can feel good,
    Come to us now in this barren Zen temple,
    With only a shrub and an altar of wood.

    H/t Darwin Catholic, I think.


  • An Episcopal priest leaves the ECUSA…

    …for the Anglican Mission in America. This mission is originally from Anglicans in Rwanda and Singapore to the North American people.  He tells his story here.

    Isn’t it great that Asian and African Christians are sending missionaries to North America?  I think so.  We need it!  Here’s more on the AMiA.


  • More from tsogb.

    The last post intrigued me and I spent some time reading The Scent of Green Bananas.

    Wow.

    Mmmmm.

    Just look at the pictures.


  • Is this what Chris ate in Spain?

    Chris, on a trip to Spain, told us about tocino del cielo.

    Is this it?  Money quote:

    It’s simple — just 25 egg yolks and a kilo of sugar.

    Another recipe, in which the egg yolks are diluted somewhat with egg white (nine yolks to three whites), is here.

    I think the English name ("egg flan") is boringly descriptive.


  • Rodent!

    Oo!  I’m an adorable little rodent!

    I better enjoy it while it lasts… this is from the Carnival traffic, I’m sure.  Soon enough I’ll be demoted back to Flappy Bird or worse.

    Unless some of you stick around and link again.


  • “I have a PhD and actual tenure.” So there.

    Get this.

    Purdue graduate student Paul Deignan posts (under his real name) critical comments on a thread about Samuel Alito that appear on a fairly popular feminist blog, BitchPhD.

    Sample of Deignan’s comments:

    This is a federalism issue, not the overbroad characterization you give it. All the state needs to enact laws to allow the suit. You seem to think that state constitutions and the 11th amendment can be ignored–that is activist.

    Should I bother with the rest of your unexamined talking points? I don’t think it would be worth the effort–I’d be putting in more effort and thought than you are willing to invest yourself.

    So, critical, disagreeing, but hardly what I’d call rude or obnoxious.  Right?  Nevertheless, most of the site’s regular readers don’t like him or his comments.  They respond with criticism of their own.  Nothing wrong with that, of course.  Discourse is good.

    But one of them… Wallace Hettle, who (I am not kidding) signs himself "Actual Professor" (and indeed he turns out to be a professor in the College of Social and Behavioral Sciences at the University of Northern Iowa) decides to take action.

    This "actual professor" claims to have taken the step of contacting Deignan’s thesis advisors to complain that Deignan is "libelous" and "threatening."

    Let me repeat this slowly…

    Because he didn’t like the writings that a graduate student, whom he doesn’t know, posted on a blog belonging to someone else, whom he also doesn’t know, he’s trying to intervene in the grad student’s actual, real life.

    I am pretty optimistic that Deignan’s thesis advisors — who are engineering professors, one would presume — will find the episode merely annoying or amusing or both.

    The engineering academy is not as… shall we say… receptive to this kind of ridiculous posturing.  If you’re an incompetent whiner, it shows.  Painfully fast.

    Two other things about Hettle’s commentary that are, at least, amusing to me:

    1.  These are the grounds he gives for saying that Deignan’s comments are "threatening:"  "The willingness of prolifers such as Paul Hill to use violence to advance their agenda."

       That’s right:  "given that" pro-lifers such as Paul Hill are willing to use violence, supporters of Judge Alito’s dissent (in a case about the FMLA and the Eleventh and Fourteenth Amendments!) such as Paul Deignan are threatening and libelous!

      There must be a connection… let’s see… I’ve got it!  He feels threatened by people named Paul!

    2. (and this is the one that made me laugh out loud) Hettle intimates that Paul’s future is in jeopardy because:

    … as I can testify, assistant profs are in a highly accountable, indeed vulnerable position. If PD finishes his diss. and gets a real job, (a big if), and continues his obsessive behavior, he won’t last long as an academic.

    If he gets a "real job" he won’t last long as an "academic?"

    News flash here:  Daignan studies mechanical engineering.

    No offense to engineering professors, but I think Daignan’s idea of a "real job" might be a leetle bit different from the concept held by "Actual Professor" Hettle, who sounds like he suffers from an inferiority complex.  At minimum he is displaying astonishing naivete.


  • Modular.

    My house — the one that’s to be put up in the side yard — is a little bit unusual.  Outside I can hear the hammers as five men assemble the forms for the basement walls. 

    But the house itself is already finished.  The Norse Homes website promises that it enjoys climate-controlled comfort on a factory floor in Ladysmith, Wisconsin, while it awaits its final resting place here in Minneapolis.

    Yesterday when the housing inspector pulled up to discuss something or other with the men about to pour the concrete, I popped out to say hello.  Hi.  I’m the homeowner.

    The inspector looked from me to the house I’d just come out of to the hole in the ground next door.  Of that one, or that one?

    Both.  We split the lot.

    He looked down at the plans and muttered, It’s a plop ‘n’ drop.

    I knew what he meant.  Everything okay?

    That’s just what we call these things, the ones that aren’t stick-built on site.  By carpenters. He looked at me with a tight smile.  I just personally get offended when people take the jobs away from the local carpenters.

    I shrugged.  I couldn’t afford it otherwise.  Put a modular home factory in Minneapolis, and I’da hired Minneapolis carpenters.

    It’s true.  If it weren’t for the modular housing option, we wouldn’t have built the house, and the five men outside wouldn’t be working on it, and the dozen men who were there yesterday morning wouldn’t have been working on it, and Archie who drove the excavator wouldn’t have dug the hole, and our neighbor Rich wouldn’t have had the chance to bid on our new fence, and whichever local carpenter we hire to build the porch wouldn’t have had that job either.

    Anyway, last time I checked, carpenters in Wisconsin needed jobs too. 


  • Foundation.

    I remember sitting down earlier this year to a clean sheet of graph paper with a mechanical pencil and a clear plastic drafting triangle.  (The triangle, like my devotion to Staedtler-Mars plastic erasers, is left over from my Engineering Graphics class almost thirteen years ago.)

    What I drew that day was one shape inside another congruent one, rectangles with a rectangle-shaped corner removed.  Later I added interior walls, details, staircases, places for windows.  But what I see today is that first pair of shapes, sketched in wooden planks and set in sand.

    Foundation_004   The crosshatching I added between the two lines will here be written in concrete. 

    That’s some pencil.

    .

    Foundation_008 The next morning, some mysterious bundles have appeared.  What could they be?

    .

    .

    Foundation_009 Ah, it’s material for constructing the forms.

    Incidentally, doesn’t the angle of repose of that sand pile, cut off the way it is by the edge of the hole, look a little… ominous?  Would you want to be standing in that man’s shoes, there in the center of the photograph?  I assume he knows what he’s doing, but… that’s sand.  And the edges of the hole collapsed in on themselves in several places before they started work yesterday.

    .

    Foundation_015 Up where it looks a bit safer:  Sparks fly as a saw bites rebar.

    .

    .

    Foundation_018 When Milo woke up this morning I asked him, "Do you want to see the men working outside?"  He gaped at me and whispered urgently, "Men!"

    I showed him this scene and he shouted appreciatively, "House!"

    It is certainly becoming recognizable as one.


  • Experts and amateurs unite!

    Formidable lawblogger Ann Althouse is beating her head against a wall.  She’s made it her mission to prevent people who don’t understand caselaw, or aren’t willing to explain caselaw, from hijacking the discussion of Judge Alito’s opinion in Chittister, the Family Medical Leave Act (FMLA) case that’s getting so much attention.

    As of now, she’s got a four-part post ( Part 1Part 2. Part 3. Part 4.) patiently explaining what she says is "horrendously complicated" caselaw.  (Admittedly, by the time she gets to Part 4, she’s starting to lose her patience.)   

    IANAL, but I sympathize.  Law, like theology or engineering or medicine, requires long years of careful study to develop even a minimum of competency of thought, and longer years of experience and continued study to develop anything like expertise in one of the many infolded intricacies. 

    A true amateur — remember the root of the word? — can, I believe, cultivate a deep knowledge base and practice in critical thinking within any of those fields.  Intense fascination with a subject, can fuel years of learning, as much outside the academy as inside it.    Haven’t we all known hobbyists who really became experts, all on their own, out of pure love for a subject, be it Civil War history or aerodynamics or engine repair or North American songbirds? 

    Others become experts for practical reasons.  A friend of mine was dissatisfied with the available curricula for teaching her homeschooled daughter to read.  She delved into journals and textbooks early-reading research, and discovered that no existing program implements correctly the findings of the most carefully designed research in education, linguistics, and neurology.  She’s now writing her own curriculum. 

    For still others, the subject finds them.  A grim diagnosis, for example, is a strong motivator (for some patients — others are perfectly content to remain ignorant and trust their doctors) to become highly specialized experts, not in a field they chose, but in one that chose them. 

    So I have a great deal of respect for the true amateur, the lover of his subject.  Having a degree in law, or science, or medicine, or whatever, is not a prerequisite for intelligent discourse even in a very detailed aspect of a field.  The formal study helps, sure, but at bottom it takes interest and attention and intelligence and time and discipline, and maybe discourse with other knowledgeable people, all of which can be had (perhaps with greater difficulty) outside the academy.  If anything the amateur-expert deserves more respect, because he or she gains expertise without the positional advantages of the full-time student or professor.

    That being said, though, there are an awful lot of people who are neither amateurs nor experts who blow a great deal of hot air; who perpetuate tired myths through soundbites; and who believe that arguments are won by sounding like a smart person, or a smart-ass, instead of by the slower, more careful, less glamorous discipline of marshalling arguments and showing how one leads to the other, on and on to the inevitable conclusion.

    And there are a lot of people who seem committed to a subject, but a few minutes’ questioning shows that they succumb to the wildest theories — the sort that leads some people to buy gadgets that promise to strip all the electrons out of their drinking water, thus increasing the bond angle of the H2O molecule, ending fatigue and burning cellulite; the sort that leads other people to claim that because they live in Ohio they do not have to pay federal income tax, and if the judge would only listen then he would see it that way too. 

    Part of this is magical thinking in action, but I can’t help but think that another part is from skipping over the grunt work of really understanding the basics of a subject, the sort of thing that many people get in Chemistry 101 through 103, and others get by, say, devouring Isaac Asimov’s nonfiction books, wishing they knew more, and turning to more-recent textbooks.

    And of course, another part is a deep distrust of anyone who gains real expertise and is able to demolish them in a real debate.  It’s so much easier to sneer than to engage.

    Anyway.  IANAL.  But the frustration Ann is experiencing is near-universal and interdisciplinary.


  • Appropriate… um… headgear for Adoration.

    Jimmy Akin describes a curious encounter in the Adoration Chapel. 

    (Potentially helpful context for non-Catholic readers:  The vigil mass for All Saints’ Day takes place on October 31st.)


  • Two “fringe” issues.

    Today I found two posts on two complex abortion-related issues that the public really has not come to terms with.  In both cases, the comments — and the personal stories they tell — are crucial reading.

    First, Cathy Young at The Y Files discusses "Abortion, fathers’ rights, and equality" using as a springboard the controversial subtopic of mandatory spousal notification.  She and her commenters search for an analogy… is it like requiring an HIV-positive person to notify his partner?  (After all, knowingly transmitting HIV to an unwitting partner is a felony, after the fact).  Or is it like requiring a wife to consent before the husband has a vasectomy?  (Most doctors will not perform one without her approval.)

    Second, Rachael writes a post not so much on a controversial issue of legality as on a controversial issue of the wisdom of the idea, widely accepted even among many opponents of abortion on demand, that a rape victim who becomes pregnant is generally better off if she has an abortion.    She presents compelling evidence that the abortion-after-rape is experienced by many victims as a second rape.  Again, the comments are crucial reading, as victims who came to different conclusions respond to one another.   (Hat tip to Annie at After Abortion.)

    Regardless of your political stance on abortion in general or on these sub-questions:  It’s a moral duty to keep in mind the human faces, human stories of all the people involved. both those who are faced with terrible choices and those who are denied choice.   Anecdotes do not substitute for data.  But hefting the weight of a few anecdotes before considering the mass of numbers (21.3 abortions per 1000 women per year; about 43 percent of all women have had at least one by age 45, according to the Alan Guttmacher Institute) helps one understand the human cost.