bearing blog


bear – ing n 1  the manner in which one comports oneself;  2  the act, power, or time of bringing forth offspring or fruit; 3 a machine part in which another part turns [a journal ~];  pl comprehension of one’s position, environment, or situation;   5  the act of moving while supporting the weight of something [the ~ of the cross].


  • Entering the tenth year of maintenance: a small series.

    I don't know if you can believe it or not, but next month it will be the ninth anniversary of my six-month push to a 40-pound weight loss which took me down to a weight 52 pounds lower than my highest nonpregnant weight.

    Since then I've had two babies and — mostly — maintained it.  I say "mostly" because 

    • after a few months at that weight, I decided that too many people were asking me if I'd been ill, and deliberately re-gained about 6 pounds, at which point the concerned questions stopped.
    • after my most recent pregnancy, not quite all of that came back off, and I stabilized at a weight that was, let's see, ten pounds heavier than that.  

    And that's more or less where I've been for the last two years or so, with some seasonal and vacation-related fluctuations.  I did manage to get within three pounds of my pre-pregnancy weight at one point, but it proved difficult to maintain and I went up to the ten-pounds-higher one.

    Still in the "normal" range, though!    And  that's why I feel like I can keep saying I maintained the weight loss.  I maintained most of it and am pretty stable.  As in, for the last two years I have not been working particularly hard, and my weight has not changed much at all, apart from some seasonal-type fluctuations.

    + + +

    Let's just label as "seasonal-type" the few extra pounds I took back with me from my five weeks in the French Alps, the Italian Riviera, and London. 

    I knew it was coming.  I had spent the last few weeks drinking a lot of pints of bitter and glasses of good red wine, and eating a good deal of cheese, pasta, and meat pies.  Somewhere in there I made a deal with myself that I would stop worrying about it, enjoy myself thoroughly, and implement Austerity Measures as soon as I returned.

    + + +

    Austerity Measures seemed like a better name to me than a lot of the other trendy ones burbling around these days, like Clean Eating (with which I have a word association problem) or Whole 30 (why exactly thirty?)  or, uh, I don't know… Dump Dinners?  Can we get rid of the phrase Dump Dinners?   Just for the hell of it?

    Anyway, having come so recently from France, I decided on some decidedly French Austerity Measures before I got home. 

    British Austerity Measures are not nearly as pleasant.  Trust me, when you are in London, you want abandon, not austerity.  You want three pints a day and plenty of meat pies.  The same goes for Italy.   You want pizza and pesto and gelato (and more gelato) and lots of wine.  

    But actually, French-style Austerity Measures aren't too bad.  I will elaborate in upcoming posts.

    + + + 

    I also want to write a little bit about:

    • the trap of Only One Number, and my recent goal to generate other interesting numbers to distract me from it;
    • long-term (first medium, and then very long-term) thinking;
    • my ever-present concern (since about 2010) that in writing about weight control at all, I'm contributing to a culture of body shaming, making an idol out of Looking Not Fat, and putting myself in a not-so-good headspace;
    • and the surprising situation I'm in, of thinking about my physical self in a future that, likely will have no more babies in it.

    Be patient with me, it'll probably take me a month to get all four or five or so of these posts out there.  But:  that's November, my goal-weight anniversary month, and I can't help but be thinking about it a lot.  So I guess I might as well take you along.


  • Reading matériel (III).

     Continuing from the last post and the one before that.

    + + +

    Assassins d'avant by Élisa Vix

    IMG_4321

    This one is another roman policier.

    One of the nice things about reading to improve one's language is that you don't really have to read things that are very literary.  Popular works, for the sake of their popularity, can be instructive all by themselves.  Not that this isn't going to be literary; I don't know whether it is or not.  But I don't need it to be.  I just need it to be interesting enough to keep the pages turning.

    The back-of-the-book summary:

    Manuel Ferreira is a cop.  When a young woman asks to interview him about the ranks of the police, he's charmed at first.  But when she pulls out a photograph taken twenty-five years ago, the worst of memories rise up to the surface.

    Adèle Lemeur is no journalist, but a medical researcher.   Her mother was Marie Moineau, the fifth-grade teacher killed in front of her classroom of students, including Manuel himself—who never forgot that terrible scene, and maybe became a cop to exorcise it.  

    She wants to know why her mother died, and Manuel is the only one who can help her find his former classmates, the witnesses to the crime.  He says yes:  because he wants to see her again, because of his unhappiness, because of his love for the one woman he has no right to love.

    In a novel as incisive as it is mysterious, Elisa Vix drives her heroine on the trail of a truth that lies in wait to snare her.  Twenty-five years are not enough to repair the wounds and the lies.  And what if Adèle has been sheltered from these things for her own good?  And what if there is no such thing as a family without something to hide?  Adèle will go farther than she ever imagined.

     So, there you go, pretty standard French detective novel.  Maybe a little psychological thriller throw in for good measure.

     

     

     

     

     + + + 

    Le Chemin de Mère Adèle Garnier by Gianmario Pica

    IMG_4316

    First things first:  I did not buy this book.  It was handed to me for free by Sister Thomasina of the Tyburn Nuns when we visited the shrine.

     But it wound up in my hands (in England), and I will probably crack it open at some point, so I may as well mention it.  

    Mother Adèle was, of course, the foundress of the congregation, and her cause for canonization has recently been opened; she has formally received the title "Servant of God" as of, oh, about a year ago.  This book came out in 2013.  Some Googling reveals a few details which the Catholic press found interesting, namely that the foundress is said to have witnessed multiple Eucharistic miracles.  But Sister Thomasina hadn't mentioned that to me, stressing instead Mother Adèle's personal holiness and the great gift that is the Martyrs' Shrine.

     Here's the brief biography of Mother Adèle on the Tyburn website.  I am interested to know more about this woman and her work.

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    + + +

    L'Équation du Nenuphar:  Les Plaisirs de la Science, by Albert Jacquard

    IMG_4314

    Waterlilies again!  

    I stood in the bookstore for a long time with several books by this author in my hand.  I was looking for nonfiction essays, and I couldn't decide which of his books to buy. 

    My eye had lit upon his name as I scanned the "essais" section, because I noticed right away that he appeared to have published books essays on at least two distinct topics:  general science and philosophy.  The philosophy book was entitled, Petite philosophie à l'usage des non-philosophes, that is, "Little philosophy for non-philosophers."  That interested me, because I am not a trained or certified philosopher, but I do my share of philosophizing. 

    The science book purported to be the sort of thing to demonstrate the beauty and pleasure of science to people who (unlike me) are not trained scientists.  So in one sense, the other book was for me, and this book was not for me.  But on the other hand, there is the potential to enounter the pleasure of science in French.  That would be new.  And I like the idea of reading philosophy by scientists, and of studying and performing science with the eye and mind of philosophy — which is what's necessary to know science's place in the scheme of things. 

    So I immediately knew I wanted to get one of this guy's books and see what he had to say.  It was just a matter of whether to get one, both, or neither.  In the end I put down the philosophy book and promised myself I could order it later if the science book made me think I wanted more.

    Jacquard, who died in 2013, seems to have been quite the polymath:  double baccalaureates in math and philosophy, master's degree in factory engineering from the École Polytechnique, civil servant, additional studies in population genetics and an appointment at the WHO as well as at several universities.  He has written numerous works of professional and popular science as well as works of politics and philosophy.  I'm interested to meet this author:  it may well be that we will have points of difference in our politics, but in any case I should enjoy some of the work I'll have to do to hear him out.

     

     

     

     

     

    + + +

    A Stack of Magazines

    IMG_4322

    Not much to explain here!  Most of these are cooking magazines, and one is sort of a French equivalent of Scientific American.  I set reminders on my calendar to dole them out to myself at the rate of one every two months. 

    I do have a couple of other things, namely a couple of cookbooks, but I'll bring those up if and when I ever make some food with them.  As I got some interest from these, I will probably attack Et ils eurent beaucoup d'enfants first.  I hope to report back with at least a few pages read.


  • Reading matériel (II).

    Continuing from the last post.

    I was thinking this morning, it's too bad that I didn't buy anything in Italian.  I have exactly one book in Italian (not counting the first one that I set aside after discovering that it famously includes lots of Sicilian which is impenetrable by all my Italian dictionaries), which I was using to slowly improve my Italian before leaving.  I'd like to continue studying Italian—and also to maintain my French—and to reprise my haphazard study of Somali out of local interest—argh, so many languages, so little time.

    Oh well, I do have French covered for the next couple years of reading, anyway.  That's pretty optimistic, actually.  I doubt I will get through these all in two years.

    + + +

     

    Cuisine Facile pour Parents Pressés, from the "Mon Cahier" series

    IMG_4313

     

    All the bookstores I entered in France had a spinning metal rack stocked with these little self-help paperbacks, all labeled with some variation on "Mon Cahier" (My Notebook).   Recipe books, diet advice of all kinds, home organization, budgeting, meditation, juicing, controlling your temper, positive thinking.  All the ones I picked up begin with a Cosmo-style quiz to find out what sort of cook/housekeeper/thinker you are and purport to design their approach to your type. 

    I am fascinated with cross-cultural self-help advice and I was sorely tempted to buy several.   I restricted myself to one that might actually be useful to me.  This one, in case you can't tell, is "Easy Cooking for Busy Parents."   (I wish, now, that I had also bought "Cooking for Less Than 3 Euros.")  

    Do you want to know what French "Easy Cooking for Busy Parents" has for main dishes?

    Open-faced sandwiches with meat, cheese, and pickled cucumbers and onions; risotto-style shell pasta with mushrooms, Mimolette cheese aged six months, and ham; "authentic Cantonese rice" which is essentially fried basmati rice with egg, chives, peas, ham, and five-spice powder; croque-monsieur type sandwiches stuffed with duck breast and tomato marmalade (or maybe it's dried tomatoes in oil); potato galette with smoked salmon.

    I think I will enjoy playing with some of these.  But I don't know that it will be any easier than what I've been doing.  On the other hand, it will give me an excuse to find out if any of the cheese shops around here carry Mimolette, which Googling taught me just now is "A gratable, melting cheese ike parmesan, but brilliant orange."  Orange cheese!  And French!

     

     

     

     

    + + + 

    Aurélie Valognes, En Voiture, Simone!

      IMG_4317

     I picked this up from a bestseller table, knowing nothing whatsoever about the novelist or the book.  The title appears to mean Get in the car, Simone!; the previous title advertised on the book sleeve apparently means Grandma in the Nettles.

    I picked it up because the setup didn't sound amusing but it claims to be a comedy novel; I was curious because of its apparent popularity.  It's exactly the sort of book I would never pick up in English.   I'll just translate the back of the book for you:

    Recipe for an irresistible family comedy:  one despotic and selfish father (Jacques), plus one mother (Martine), rebelling after forty years of marriage.  Also their sons:  Matthieu the eternal adolescent although father to three children; Nicolas, chef by day and authoritarian [I think?  the word is literally "castrating"] all the time; Alexandre, the dreamer and  slacker.  And… three deliciously insufferable daughters-in-law!  Stéphanie, the anxious mother hen; Laura, the anxious vegetarian; Jeanne, the newest addition, feminist and bewildered, whose arrival is about to throw the family out of balance.  Put everyone in a big house in Brittany.  Add to this mixture Antoinette, a grandmother with wisdom to rival the Dalai Lama; and one tagalong dog.  Stir well, let simmer… and enjoy!

    Like I said, this is the sort of book I would never pick up if it were in English and set in the U. S.  I generally don't like insufferable characters and am hoping that the dog is the protagonist, or possibly the grandma.  But we shall see.  It got a lot of one-star reviews on Amazon, but many of these seem to be by people who were disappointed because it was the same as a book sold previously under a different title that they'd already read.  So I will keep an open mind.

     

    + + +

    Jochen Gerner, Repères:  2000 Dessins pour Comprendre le Monde

    IMG_4319

     

     Benchmarks, 2000 Cartoons For Understanding the The World.

    The author/artist is the cartoonist for a weekly independent, ad-free newsmagazine called le 1, Un Journal pour Comprendre le Monde (The 1:  A Paper for Understanding the World).  That's its logo in the lower right corner of the cover.

    The paper is called "The 1" because each week's issue concerns one sole topic, about which it says it includes articles from different points of view.  It's also a really short newsmagazine, only 16 pages.  (Nine euros per month for a digital subscription, in case you're wondering, or about $2.60 an issue.)

    The cartoons are mini-lessons in history, culture, and current affairs.   A number of them concern topics internal to French policy and government, which I thought I would find interesting and educational; also a great way to learn some vocabulary I don't have.

     

    IMG_4320

    More of my purchases in another post.


  • Reading matériel (I).

    I took advantage of a sojourn in France to get to a bookstore and browse titles, looking for things that might be fun to read. 

    Obviously, it's easier than it ever has been to obtain media published in other countries; I've ordered from Amazon.fr and Amazon.co.uk numerous times, when there was something specific I was looking for.  But when I'm looking for something new and interesting to read, there is no substitute for walking into a library or bookstore, full of physical books, and browsing:  reading the backs of the covers, the tables of contents; seeing how books are jumbled together on tables; opening to a page in the middle and deciding if I like that sort of style.

    Limited, of course, by luggage space, I couldn't buy everything I thought I might like.  But I tried to get a sampler of things that might keep me in French, whenever I felt like attacking some, for a few years.  

    Note:  I still have not read any of these.  The books are on my bedside shelf, waiting for a moment when I don't drop to sleep the moment I hit the pillow (yes, still jetlagged).  The magazines are stowed in a holder and I've set an email reminder to order myself to "deliver" one to me every two months for the next year.  

    Here are a couple of the books I bought.  In the interest of getting a post out today, I'll save others for another post. 

    Michel Bussi, N'Oublier Jamais  

    IMG_4315
     This is a novel by the same author as Nymphéas Noirs (now in English translation as Black Water Lilies), the detective novel that I read all summer to get myself back into a French-speaking mindset.   

    Nymphéas was a real page-turner, perfect for driving me forward through the difficulties of reading in French (my best second language, but still so much slower than reading in English).   

    I had also bought a republished form of the author's first novel, originally Omaha Crimes, now called Gravé dans le Sable, which began with a sort of apology for it because he wrote it when he was relatively inexperienced at researching the details of the settings of his novels.  Let's just say:  the setting was the U. S., and the apology was warranted.

    But I enjoyed the author's style very much, and I have more hope for this one, supposedly a standard roman policier.  At any case, I've definitely learned that mysteries are an effective way to keep the pages turning even when it takes effort and a dictionary app at hand.

     

     

     

     

     

    Marielle Blanchier (with Pascale Krémer), Et Ils Eurent Beaucoup d'Enfants…

    IMG_4318The title of this memoir, I think, is meant to evoke a fairytale phrase of sorts:  "and they had many children."

    I'll just translate the back for you.

    Marielle has twelve children.  When she got married, this trained chemist never imagined she would find herself at the head of such a household.  But life and love played a pretty trick on her.

    In this book, she relates the great joys and the little troubles of her daily life:  back-to-school season, Mother's Day, birthdays, chores… But also the baguettes (36 per week), the milk (100 liters every month), and the ultra-fast recipes.  At the same time, she shares some principles of childrearing and her scheme of organization, down to the millimeter, that allows her to devote some time to everyone.  A fascinating and extraordinary adventure that confirms the adage: a big family makes a happy family!

    I think this will be interesting precisely because large families, even "medium" ones like mine, are so very, very rare in France at this time.  It's not that I need her tips, tricks, and principles (although I'm always up for those); it's more that I am curious how this author presented herself and her family.  And if her background is in chemistry, well, she and I will have that in common as well.  Looking forward to it.

     I'll share more books later…. 


  • Lifestyle lessons.

    When I was about to come home from our family Europe trip three years ago, I listed some practices I wanted to bring back with me, so that our vacation would leave me permanently changed, if only by a little bit.

    And then there's the food. Since I have been here I have made a new vow at every meal, it seems. When I get home I am going to find a supplier of tiny sour French pickles and I will never again eat a ham sandwich without them. I will buy the beer at Surdyk's which is attached to the city's best cheese shop and I will find out if they sell Abondance and Tomme de Savoie, and I will make salads with fine ribbons of white, soft-rinded cheeses and twists of proscuitto. I will throw out all the bottled salad dressings and make only pungent mustard vinaigrettes and luscious cream dressings with herbs. I will buy a crêpe pan and an electric fondue pot, or at least a correctly-sized enameled cast iron saucepan that will hold the heat. I will buy the expensive butter, maybe not for the whole sticks that are melted to go into waffles, but at least to spread on my sandwiches. I will make pan sauces again with cream and wine.

    I know better than to think, even for a minute, that I have time to do much of the fancy sort of French cooking. But surely I have time to make my quick meals more civilized? With the good kind of canned tuna that is packed in olive oil? With better cheeses on my salad? With tiny, ice-cold glasses of fresh-squeezed grapefruit juice?

    I did take up some of those practices, and a few others, like starting family meals with "first course" when I can manage it.

    Will I take up any new ones this time around?

    I have some thoughts.

    + + +

    Food is always the first thing I think about, because you encounter it three times a day. I wish I could get greengages or Charentais melons, but they are a rarity. Anything more feasible?

    Well, I was reminded how much I like sparkling water with meals, and a couple of the kids learned they like it for the first time. I'm not sure if it's realistic to think we'll grace our table with fizzy water; it would be a pain to lug one more liquid home from the store. But it's something maybe to have more often. One of my cousins swears by a Sodastream, just for making her water bubbly. I'm a little worried that this would lead our family down a direction I don't want to go. On the other hand, you can make tonic water with one, too. I suppose I could just buy bottles for a while and see what happened.

    I have a new interest in Ligurian red wine: tart, a bit frizzante, pale so that it nearly looks like rosé. I guess I will look for some.

    I learned to make proper fondue savoyarde, and I think I would like to try it again at home; that is, if I can find the right cheeses and wine. The wine might be tricky, since I don't think much of it is exported; but perhaps I can find something close to the right balance.

    Another thing I learned: to make tuna sandwiches by mixing good tuna only with good mayonnaise, and spreading it on soft, not-at-all-crusty bread, with lettuce and tomato (maybe capers), and slicing the egg instead of mixing it in. The results are a bit more swanky and luxurious than my prior default tuna sandwich method, which involved diced onion and celery, lots of dill pickle relish, and sometimes a baguette.

    (I will go on making tuna melts the old way, I think, though, with English muffins and sharp cheddar cheese. Those are pretty hard to beat.)

    On the English side of sandwiches, I have decided to find a nice spicy chutney or two and squirrel them away in the fridge to have on buttered bread with more sharp cheddar cheese. And for drink: I was reminded of the superiority of Samuel Smith's beers. Some of these, I am sure I can find at home in Minneapolis: Taddy Porter, oatmeal stout, a bottled bitter. Maybe (I hope) the chocolate stout. "They're what, seven dollars a bottle?!" protested Mark, but I wouldn't drink them every day. Just some of the days, and I would share. Who knows, if I look high and low I might even find the apricot beer.

    Furthermore, I have seen the light: puff pastry has great utility as a carbohydrate delivery method, and I am resolved to learn how to make sausage rolls and meat pies.

    Also cheese-and-onion spread.

    Maybe mushy peas.

    + + +

    I don't know if I have any non-food sorts of things to take up. But I find myself wishing that we went away more often, maybe just for a weekend, to do things that are interesting or relaxing not so far away from home. I don't know how realistic that is. It seems easier to do one big trip than to find the time for multiple small ones; and many weekends are taken up by Scout trips, school planning, and necessary household tasks. But I would like to make it work, if it could work.

    Who knows what you are capable of as a family if you don't try?

     


  • Homeward bound.

    Friday morning the alarm went off at six. I made coffee and curled up on the sofa to write a blog post.
    Then it was time to finish packing. We cleared out a bedroom of loose items to make a staging area for “complete” suitcases. Beginning with the three rollers that we hadn’t touched since France: climbing gear, winter hats, and the like. They had only a little room left in them for odds and ends.

    We put the kids to work setting the apartment back to rights. Obviously we don’t have to clean it thoroughly or anything, but there is a certain amount of tidying up that (a) seems to be common courtesy and (b) is required if you want to find all your belongings in the corners.

    At the end we had time for a little relaxation, or at least to keep the smaller ones occupied while the rest of us finished up. Mark needed to repair a curtain rod that the 3yo had pulled down a couple of days prior.

    I shot a selfie in my traveling clothes.

    And a couple more of the apartment: the view from the kitchen window of the lovely blue sky:

    And stepped out on the balcony into the perfect autumn day, and looked down at Bloomsbury Square:

    A van was coming to transfer us and our luggage to Heathrow. On our way back from the pub the other night, Mark and I had walked around the block that contained our apartment’s little pedestrian street, looking for a good place to wait for it. We found a sign that marked a spot as Loading Zone Only, just around the corner and across one street, and that didn’t specify who was allowed to load. So the teen boys worked to transfer the seven big suitcases and the backpacks and the car seats into a pile on the curb, one watching over the pile while the other went back and forth fetching bags.

    I gathered up the three smaller children, with the carrier and my tote crammed full of things I needed to take with me on the plane. I dropped my apartment keys on the little side table, the one with the selfie mirror, and went out the door and let it shut and lock behind me.

    + + +

    The four of spent the waiting-for-the-van time in the tot lot at Bloomsbury Square Gardens.

     

     

    Then I got the text from Mark:

     

    We got in the van, and after a ten-minute standstill because of construction traffic around Bloomsbury Square, were off. I watched the neighborhoods slip away: Soho, Marylebone, Hyde Park, Acton, Ealing.

    Heathrow.

    We grabbed lunch in the airport at Leon, a Mediterranean-ish chain restaurant. My last English meal was thus a fish finger wrap.

    And a bottle of sparkling water. I am going to miss Sparkling Water Available Wherever Still Water Is Sold.

    And to the plane.

    + + +

    The three-hour hop to Reykjavik on IcelandAir was uneventful, except for a slight mixup in ticket-reading that had us rushing off the plane to make an impossibly short connection that turned out to actually be more than an hour.

    At takeoff for our six-hour flight to Minneapolis, despite the lollipops and sips of water I had at the ready, the 3yo appeared to be having Ear Problems. He shrieked, squeezed his eyes shut and shook his head “no,” and cried that he had a headache. And then, quite suddenly, he stopped crying, panted a bit with his eyes half closed, and fell asleep.

    It was maybe five or six p.m. in the time zone we’d come from, which is not a crazy time for him to be having a nap, so I let him. He slept for a few hours, then woke up cranky and refusing to eat the bag of crackers in his complementary IcelandAir kids’ meal.

    We went to and from the bathroom a couple of times. And then, with two hours left in the flight, he threw up all over himself and his carseat.

    I was relatively prepared! I had two changes of clothes for him and a lot of baby wipes. Mark switched seats with the 11yo to sit next to me and get help from the flight attendants, and we got him cleaned up, the seat cleaned up, a plastic bag for him to sit on so the damp seat wouldn’t be uncomfortable, and all the soiled clothes packed away in waterproof bags, and a pile of paper towels at the ready in case he got sick again.

    Then he threw up again, mostly but not entirely on the pile of paper towels that I thrust under his chin. More help from the flight attendants. I was glad for Mark talking to them, accepting towels and plastic bags, so I could attend entirely to my sad, sick, and uncomfortable little boy.

    How much easier a sudden crisis can be when another person frees you up to deal with the crisis by talking to the people who are trying to help, so you don’t have to waste any energy turning back and forth, adopting alternate positions of Crisis Management and Oh Gosh Thank You.

    + + +

    The third vomit was nothing left but bile, but I caught it in a plastic garbage bag that was ready on his lap for the rest of the trip. The 3yo said he felt better, and volunteered to walk on his own carrying his backpack. Through the customs line, until they took pity on us and invited us to the head of the line, he stumbled forward a few steps and then lay down on his backpack until we had to urge him forward again.

    Really sick and not just airsick? Hard to say. We’d been up for twenty hours and this was not all that different from his behavior in the UK customs line a couple of weeks ago, when he was entirely well.

    I texted a vomit warning to H., but she was unfazed. “We’ll risk it,” she texted back. And when the two cabs we hired made it to our street, our house was already lit and full of friends.

    I carried the sleeping 3yo straight up to bed, changed my clothes, and washed my hands really well before coming down to company.

    And food!

    Fish tacos!

    GUACAMOLE.

    Even a birthday cake.

    And milk, eggs, fruit, and English muffins for the morning.

    I ate, and the kids reconnected, and we chatted, and I settled into my chair with a glass of red wine from a box, and was happy to be home. And just as we started to flag, they packed up, said “Bye! See you Monday!” and went home, leaving us fed and ready for bed.

    The pile of held mail on the counter can wait, the suitcases can wait, the laundry can wait (even the 3yo’s backpack), for one night’s sleep to the sound of the ticking of the ceiling fan in my own bedroom.

     


  • Happy birthday.

    Thursday was my birthday. It was also, sadly, our packing day, with no outings planned because we expected a tube strike that in the end never materialized.

    I had planned to spend two or three hours shopping for gifts to take home, within walking distance of the flat. But Mark managed, unexpectedly, to get a slot for each of the teen boys to go driving at Mercedes World outside of London. So instead my shopping slot was moved to the afternoon, and he took the bus with the boys.

    Before he left I took myself out for a Full English Breakfast. At the last minute I switched my order to the vegetarian version:

     

    The little frittata is spinach and feta. It was nice, and more what I wanted than two kinds of meat wojld ve.

    I bought lunch things for the younger children and myself, and went back in time for Mark and the boys to leave. A little packing happened—and then I got a migraine! I took my medication, but had to nap for the next few hours. So it is just as well that Mark and the boys got their chance.

    + + +

    After they returned, pleased and with new Mercedes lanyards for their gym IDs or whatever, I supervised some more packing; and then around five o’clock I went out myself. I walked through Covent Garden, listening to the patter of street magicians, inhaling the aromas of food from the restaurants, looking in windows. I walked into a shop that sold Scottish wool scarves, I walked into a shop that sold kitchen gadgets, a shop that sold tea things, each time looked around, but kept on walking. I really didn’t have enough time to look and think and to find things I wanted, and Covent Garden seemed to be a bit pricey.

    I set a new course for Seven Dials. Here and there shops were closing. Some had closed at five, and nearly all the boutiques would be closed by seven. Looking in windows. Nothing drew me.

    I saw a sign for a vintage-clothing store. Well, you never know what you’ll find in one of these, and here I am in London, so I walked in. Men’s clothes on the left, women’s on the right. Dresses, mainly crepe floral. A pine-green cotton sweater dress with patch pockets, briefly considered. Then I went over to rifle through the small coat rack.

    Hmm. Real leather? Check the tag. Lining, acetate, outer, leather. Hmm.

    Sixty pounds? For a leather duster that fits me perfectly, in a color I like? Yes, please! Happy birthday to me!

    And then it was time to get dinner, and that was the end of my shopping trip. And that is why I didn’t buy any presents in London.

    + + +

    Our 17yo had gone out by himself to see the UK opening of the new Bladerunner movie, so the rest of us would be having our last-night-out dinner without him. At first I was disappointed that we would miss him, and it seemed wrong that there should be only six of us (although admittedly that would make it easier to get a table).

    Then I reflected that I was getting a glimpse of the not-too-far-off future when he would be gone for most all family dinners. I decided that today would be the first evening that I would begin learning about, and looking towards, that new dynamic that is coming, the dynamic where our second oldest is the oldest who is with us at the table. It will be a good dynamic, too, and it stands for good things. And—just like that—while I was still disappointed to miss him, it did not seem wrong anymore, but completely okay and right.

    “There are six of us,” I said to the waiter in the upstairs dining room of the Nag’s Head.

    + + +

    We had a pub dinner for our last night. Mark and I started with pints of stout and IPA. I think he will be glad, if nothing else, to get home and drink some craft beer with noticeable hops.

    The 7- and 11yo ordered lemonade that turned out to be fizzy, and two starters to split as their entree: a chicken basket (popcorn chicken, grilled barbecue wings, and fried wings) and a plate of battered onion rings.

    The 13yo ordered sparkling water, and baked meat lasagna that came in an individual casserole, with a green salad.

    Mark and the 3yo split a fish and chips platter, with mushy peas on the side.

     

    And I ordered a glorious meat pie on a mound of mashed potatoes, with broccoli and carrots and a lovely gravy, and a glass of red Tempranillo wine because by then my Guinness was gone.

     

     

    Austerity measures may be called for when I get home, but not on my birthday in London.

    + + +

    Still reading? Thanks for coming along with me.

    All that is left now is the trip home. And maybe a renewed blogging habit? We shall see.


  • Greenwich. And more pints.

    Wednesday was to be our last full vacation day. Much of Thursday we expect to be spent packing our suitcases and restoring the London apartment to a condition fit to relinquish the keys. Plus we expected a Tube strike Thursday. We decided to head to the cluster of attractions in Greenwich.
    The transit itself can be part of the attraction. We went by Thames Clipper; these ferries use the Oyster Cards just like a bus or subway. We had a twenty-minute wait on the pier, but it passed quickly as we looked at the skyline and chatted about our experiences.

    Once on the boat it was a relaxing and interesting ride for everyone. The 3yo, on my lap, was very pleased to be sitting in the front corner of the ferry, where he had an excellent view of a looped rope being tossed and tightened to secure the boat to the pier each time it stopped.

     

     

     

    By the time we got to Greenwich, it was well lunchtime. We looked in a couple of restaurants in the village, but decided that we were likely to pay about the same, and more efficiently, by eating at the museum café. So straight to the National Maritime Museum we went.

    The approach has a long trough of running water coming from each side and meeting at drains in the middle. It would be a good place to sail a paper boat. The children threw autumn leaves in it to amuse the 3yo.

    There is also an impressive ship in an impressive bottle inside. The 7yo was fascinated by the concept. I wonder if anyone has ever built a LEGO ship in a bottle?

    Museum cafés don’t seem to cost significantly more than regular restaurants here in London, especially if you factor in a small tip. The cafeteria format makes it easy for the littlest verbal children to choose what they want. There are often tables large enough to accommodate our entire family. They are located right where we want to be. And the food has been reliably good.

    This one had cold sandwiches and salads, paninis that could be heated on request, and a small hot bar with a child’s plate, two plates of the day, and soup. Also, as at the Tower of London, you could put together a child’s box lunch out of a small sandwich, a bag of chips, a juice box, and two cold sides like gelatin dessert or grapes.

    Three kids got the £5 hot child’s plate of breaded chicken, fries, and English baked beans. Two teen boys got fat individually-baked casseroles of beautifully browned macaroni and cheese. I got a cold veggie wrap filled with greens, crunchy pickled carrots, and some kind of red-pepper-and-hummus-like spread, plus tomahto soup. And Mark got a plate of hot salt beef brisket with potatoes gratin (not the cheese kind, the buttery baked kind) and chunks of roasted carrots.

    I am going to miss the universal availability of bottled sparkling water. Everywhere there is bottled water, there is sparkling water for the same price as still.

    Satisfied, we went to see the Maritime Museum. Prince Frederick’s barge:

    A turning paddle wheel:

    There are two children’s areas in the museum, but unfortunately the one with a big play structure was closed. This “children’s gallery” was just about as good, though. It contained fun activities but also items exhibited here in their own right, like real cannons and cannonballs and rigging equipment. Our three younger kids were in their element, but the teens enjoyed it too.

    There’s a ballistics simulator with a cannon you can raise with a crank or turn on a turntable to shoot at a faraway island. If you are 13 and not 3 you can learn from your error and correct the trajectory until you win the game. If you are 3 you can turn a big wheel and make it go “boom.”

    Or you can find a Jolly Roger hat and use a crane to load bags of hemp and wool onto a boat.

     

    Extraction from the children’s area finally accomplished, we managed to see some other exhibits before moving on. The Nelson exhibit was cooler than I had expected. My favorite part was an interactive screen that showed the ship movements in the Battle of the Nile and the Battle of Trafalgar. I am fond of military history and strategy, even though I have nevr had the time to dig into it as much as I would like, and I appreciated being able to step the ship movements forward and backward in time while zooming and rotating the map. Something like that makes it so much easier to see how command decisions interact with the geography and with each other. It is really far better than reading.

    Maybe it’s actually the geography that interests me. The landforms and waterways we can still see today, and how people moved in them once upon a time. How we have changed the landscape and what the consequences will be. Geography and humans together. Battles are just a very rapid and intense kind of chapter in that same story.

    But the technology is part of it too. So battles, writ large, are a story of goals and motivations and planning and strengths versus constraints, costs and benefits. If you forget about the pain and suffering (and the simulator does; but examples of that are in the next case over) it’s an engineering problem, or a game. Which way to think about it when? Should it always be both? One or the other? Or neither?

    + + +

    Through some windows in the Maritime Museum you can see a wide swath of green grass, now littered with leaves from the trees that dot it, criscrossed with walking paths, and sweeping up a high hill. Speaking of battle geography, and having just come from the castle-studded Aosta Valley not long ago it would be entirely unsurprising to my untrained eyes if the top of the hill were crowned by a fortress to watch over the flow of the Thames. But of course the sight of the base of that grassy hill thrills me not because of its military value, but because it is the site of the Observatory.

    It is a rather long climb up the hill. Once you are up there it is obvious why the observatory is there. It is the tallest thing around.

    The children all had to take selfies at the Prime Meridian.

    Then we explored the Observatory itself. Many of the instruments are still in place, including the one that was used to fix the meridian.

    We had a moment of sympathy for poor Halley, who had one of the loveliest monuments in Westminster (placed on the occasion of one of the comet transits) but whose meridian, marked at Greenwich by a strip of metal on a wall, didn’t win the day. But perhaps we should have more sympathy for the pavement-layers, because the marked meridian is inaccurate too, thanks to imperfections in the plumb-line method given variations in gravity. The GPS-measured prime meridian is about 100 meters away, and as of this writing, still unmarked.

     

     

    There’s a working equatorial telescope (the kind that you can set to compensate for the rotation of the earth so you can take a good photograph of stars). In the winter it’s possible to come and look through it on special astronomy nights.

    And there’s a big planetarium.

     

    We could have stayed for the next show, perhaps, but Mark had other plans. The Cutty Sark! The tea clipper has been lovingly restored, and its interior is a museum unto itself. With some of the best-designed museum displays, for pure ability to transmit information, that I have seen yet.

    London museums have been top-notch in this regard, by the way. Just in the skill with which they display both quantitative and qualitative information. It’s all very smartly done.

    The Cutty Sark is absolutely worth a go. I liked it far more than I expected I would. Partly because of the ship itself, partly because of the excellent displays. Also because they had very, very good displays and activities for young children in every part of the ship, not just in a dedicated children’s gallery. Both my little boys were engaged the whole time. A motorized bench you could sit on to feel the “rocking of the ship;” a game of stacking little weighted cubes, boxes of tea, in the hold without tipping the toy ship mounted on a bearing.

    There was another excellent simulator here, of steering a ship from Sydney to London while taking advantage of the trade winds. What I liked about this one was that your display consisted of a world tradewinds map, a closeup of your
    ship with arrows showing the trade winds in the immediate vicinity, and a compass. No big picture, no GPS dot on the map showing where you are. You have to pay attention and keep track.

    Top deck. Part of it was roped off; jumpsuited men and women with badges labeled “Professional Rigger” were working behind the curtain.

    Officer’s saloon. Note the drink holders that swing freely from the ceiling on either side of the light fixture

    Pantry

    Mark spent a lot of time admiring the mechanism that converted rotation of the wheel into rotations of the rudder. I was chasing the 3yo at the time and missed most of the explanation from the docent in the cap.

    But that was okay, because it gave us something more to talk about over pints of Extra Stout and Double Four Lager and Organic Apricot Fruit Beer after dinner, and a walk along the Strand.


  • Tyburn, Westminster Abbey, Matilda.

    We are down to the last few days, and on the last day there’s a Tube strike planned, so we must focus.

    I made the three big kids get up at nine and leave at ten, because the sisters at Tyburn Convent offer a tour of their shrine daily at 10:30.

    Outside Marble Arch tube station we discovered something cool: outdoor ping pong tables! The last players had left the ball on the surface, tented under two paddles so it wouldn’t roll away: two more paddles were in slots under the table.

    Sadly, we had to move on so as not to be late.

    Tyburn Convent and Shrine occupies two adjacent door-fronts of a row of buildings opposite Hyde Park. We crossed a couple of streets and easily found it; it stands out with its red brick and its large outdoor crucifix, and a switchbackihg accessibility ramp. First we went in the convent’s front door, into a tiny lobby with a door and also a grilled window, and stairs behind a tall metal gate going down, and many notices posted on the walls, and rang the bell. And waited. Then we wondered if we should have gone up the ramp; perhaps that was the entrance to the shrine?
    I sent the 13yo ahead and then walked there myself. The ramp led to a button-operated sliding glass door which admitted us directly to an adoration chapel, with a few people inside: an elderly white couple, a Hispanic mother with a stroller and a toddler. The Host was exposed behind the grille in front.
    If I stumble accidentally into an adoration chapel, it seems rather pointedly wrong to say “Excuse me, I was looking for something else,” and stumble out again, so I signaled “A few minutes” to my oldest and we knelt down briefly, paused there.
    + + +
    The Tyburn Nuns is a well-beloved shorthand for the Benedictine Adorers of the Sacred Heart of Jesus of Montmartre. This is their motherhouse, and they have monasteries in several other countries. The canonization cause for their foundress, Marie-Adèle Garnier, founded the congregation in France in 1898 (at Montmartre, hence the name) but fled to England because of the laws in France against religious orders, and settled there at Tyburn, a bit more than a stone’s throw from the site where the English Catholic martyrs of the Reformation were hanged along with centuries’ worth of common people accused of crimes.
    After our brief adoration we genuflected and went back to the front lobby, where a sister was just opening the door to see who had rung the bell. “I will get someone to open the grille,” she said, in a strong West African accent, and closed it again. And then behind us we heard a hearty, “Hello!”
    Coming up the stairs one foot at a time was a plump, cheerful, bespectacled nun, like me not quite five feet tall. “I’m so sorry I didn’t hear the bell,” she said, “I was just putting the mop and bucket away, and then I thought to myself, I hear footsteps upstairs. Are you here to come down to the crypt?”
    “Yes, we’re here for the tour of the shrine,” I said, “are we in the right place?”
    She laughed as if that was a silly question, because of course it was. “You’re very welcome here!”
    I introduced myself and the children, and explained that my husband had stayed back with the two youngest, and she said that next time I should bring them along as she unlocked the gate and welcomed us down to the basement crypt. “I’m Sister Thomasina,” she said.

    “Now I want you to know that as you’re looking around down here, please feel free to take pictures. As many as you want! I know some feel they aren’t supposed to, in a holy place. But our work is for everyone, and the more people know about it, the better.”

    So I did take pictures.

    This is their altar, topped by small replica of the Triple Tree:

    Sister Thomasina had a way of telling that started down a path, went down a trail, backed up to the main narrative, then started again down another trail. She began by explaining the long history of hangings at Tyburn. “East was the sea,” she said, “so when people approached London from the countryside they came from the west, and there was a little river here, the Tyburn. And you know, they wanted the criminals to be hanging there when visitors came from the west, so that is why the executions were here. And—listen—” She held up a finger and we heard a low rumble grow, tremble the floor, and die off. “That’s the train, from the Underground. Well, we’re downstream of the Triple Tree, and you know, the river once flowed under here, it forked. So we say that the blood of the martyrs flowed under our feet.”

    She described hanging and drawing and quartering in detail, and she had a very different demeanor from the Yeoman Warder who gave our Tower tour; he played it for laughs. She was not somber, though; there was a certain cheerfulness in her telling of the story. She explained the size of the gallows, big enough to drive two carts side by side under each crossbeam, big enough to hang eight people on each, twenty-four in all.

    “These reliquaries on the walls,” she said. “On this side”—she gestured—”these relics were spirited away to France during the persecution, and they’ve been brought back here. And these on this side went to Spain, and they’re back thanks to the Spanish Embassy.”

     

     

    “And here, come here.” She beckoned us up to the gallows-altar, and flung back the red cloth covering it to reveal the altar-stone. “The relics in this stone are those of Edmund Campion.” I put my hand to my face, and she invited me, “You can come and venerate it, if you like,” and so I did, walking up and laying my fingers on the cool stone surface.
    “There’s some historic items over there if you’ll just let me fetch my keys,” she said, already on her way across the floor. The kids and I went into the other room, which was posted with a chapter from a book explaining the evidence for the location of the Tyburn gallows, and engravings that pictured the hangings and the grandstands, and a map of the path taken from Newgate Prison to Tyburn, with the stops along the way. One stop had been at Ely Place, where the 17yo and I had attended Sunday mass.
    There was another bulletin board with pictures of more recent martyrs. Seven priests. Three nuns. Twenty-one men. Children. “Yes, it’s never stopped,” said Sister Thomasina. “And people from all over the world ask us to pray for them. This place is a center.”

    Sister Thomasina invited us through the gate into the kitchen garden, in a tiny courtyard. “Here is where we grow our herbs, and the salad things,” she said. “We have room to try some new things now and then. Here, we are trying to grow an avocado tree. Don’t know if it will bear fruit but it is worth a try.”

    In one corner of the garden was a raised stone sepulchre. “That’s our foundress,” said Sister. There was a little kneeler in front of the tomb, and above it a mural of the resurrected Christ. Right next to the kneeler was a large glassed-in bulletin board in which were posted printed emails. I leaned over; they were clearly petitions submitted to the Sisters via a website combox of some sort. All were crisp with relatively recent dates. I suspect that if you send them an email and ask for a prayer, your prayer will be posted here, next to the little kneeler.

    She gathered us around and handed us a little card with a prayer printed on it. “A prayer for the canonization of our foundress,” she said. “Why don’t you come around here and let’s all say it together right now.”

    So we did, and then headed back through the door, passing more posted petitions.

    The crucifix on the wall we passed bears a tag that reads: Pray for those who died around this crucifix at Ypres in the 1914-1918 war and for their chaplain. R. I. P.

     

    Before we left, Sister said to us, still unflappably cheerful: “If you have anything that is worrying you or burdening you, leave it here at Tyburn. Our prayers are for everyone here. Prayer is our work. Leave it here at Tyburn. And,” she added with a wider grin, “if your burden isn’t lifted, you may take that to mean that we can use some help! And pray for us, then.”

    On our way past Marble Arch we found the stone marking Tyburn where she had said it would be, flanked by three little oaks that had been recently planted to make a new Triple Tree.

     

     

    + + +

    We walked down to the Bond Street station, past Selfridge’s (which would be a better shopping destination than Harrods).

    I had promised my daughter some sushi. We found a chain called Wasabi in the mall. Very nice: you can pick individually wrapped pieces of nigiri, maki, onigiri, and other things to make a bento box, or grab a preassembled combo to go. Also there are hot noodles and rice bowls. Once again, London fast food wins the category.

    Then we took the tube to Westminster Abbey. Which had once been Benedictine, like Tyburn. But of course is quite different now.

     
    I won’t go into too many details, since Westminster Abbey is well known and easy to read about. I was surprised that the high and narrow nave did not really impress me all that much; on television it looks as if it would be sweeping and dramatically high, but it seemed smaller in real life. But I did enjoy very much the great age of it, the haphazard clutter of memorials and tombs placed any which way, the weight of the years measured in tombs of kings. The ceiling of the Lady Chapel is intricate as lace, and its survival of the Reformation a thing to be grateful for. My daughter loved Poet’s Corner, and was pleased as punch to find a tidy little memorial to Wordsworth, her own favorite poet. What I think I liked best was the Chapterhouse, with its single central column rising up and branching into a many-splintered ceiling, and its perfect proportions; and the simple fact of all the monarchs’ coronations, all on the same spot, since 1066.
    I am not into the monarchy as celebrity, not all that interested in the queen’s houses and the changing of the guard; but I am impressed by any human institution that preserves its relics and rituals for so long. I find myself, late at night, looking up place-names that I happened upon that day (High Holborn; Watling Street) to find out how long it’s been there, how long it’s had the name. I like the idea of things and practices enduring. And of the physical evidences of it: the golden spoon among the Crown Jewels, the ancient chair kept under glass in the Abbey.
    + + +
    A couple of views from the walk back:

    I came back to find Mark working:

    “What did you do while you were home with Daddy?” I asked the 3yo. “We went to the playground,” he said, “and we went for a walk in the town.” They had walked to the grocery store. He was very pleased about it. I later found out that “Let’s go for a walk in the town” had been the refrain all afternoon until Mark had agreed to run an errand.
    Mark and I went out for a pint:

     

    And picked up dinner (more sushi from a different chain):

     

    I snapped a photo of a sign I had passed many times over the past few weeks, and been pleased by:

    After a quick gobble of dinner, I set out with four children to the Cambridge Theatre in Seven Dials. We had tickets to Matilda: The Musical.

     

    I haven’t time for a proper review, so I’ll just say that we all loved it, with the possible exception of the 7yo for whom it was a bit too intense and dark. I think he was okay in the end, though. Although I love Roald Dahl (even, or especially, his stories not written for children), I never have read the book Matilda nor seen the movie from a few years ago. I only had a vague idea of the plot. So it was unspoiled for me, and I enjoyed it greatly. There seem to be a few places in the story that are paced irregularly, the mark of an imperfect adaptation. But the music is wonderful, and there was the extra delight of a passel of very talented children. Matilda herself was played wonderfully dryly by Savannah Read, a tiny girl with long red hair and expressive body language. The set design and lighting is brilliant. A lovely evening out with the kids.


  • V&A, Diana Memorial Playground, and my first London show.

    The Victoria & Albert Museum, which seems to be officially christened the V&A these days, had an exhibit going that made Mark want to go with me.
    It wasn’t a very large exhibit, just one room of objects and materials, but put together very well. In the museums I have been to here, the explanatory materials (signage, accompanying videos, interactives) have been top-notch for anything remotely technological.

    This one had plenty of interesting objects as well as technical demonstrations (how is plywood made? why can it be formed into so many shapes? why does it make such good chairs?). With the right glues, it can be waterproof; it’s light, formable, and strong; we saw boats, car parts, suitcases, a bookbinding (the Shackleton exhibition brought a printing press to Antarctica and printed books using their plywood packing crates as hardbacks). Disposable lightweight airplane gas tanks:

     

    Eames (yes, he of the sleekly curved and modern molded plywood chair) apparently did his war work making sleekly curved and modern molded plywood leg splints:

    Having finished that, we picked galleries that both of us were interested in (so I probably saw something quite different than I would have had I gone alone. We stuck to the rooms labeled “Techniques and Materials,” and started with the enormous collection of cast iron and wrought iron.

    Rooms and rooms and rooms of it. Railings, pothooks, keys, altarpieces, fire baskets, gates.
    We also saw silver and gold work, the jewelry room, alabaster and ivory carvings (the latter, mostly small pieces, displayed under glass in drawers you could pull out, so you could examine them closely). A display of sculpted clay pieces arranged them to show the different steps in the process: rare surviving works in unfired clay, then terra cotta, then glazed works.
    Wood carving masterworks struck Mark’s fancy. This was his favorite. Its detail and composition reminded me of large pieces in the MIA at home, carved in China from jade:
     

    I appreciated the building itself very much. It lacked the maze of cubical white rooms that’s so common, and is made instead of courts and wide, high halls, many of them visible from above by means of galleries on the upper floors. They display many large pieces that way. The smaller galleries that run alongside often contain explanatory material or smaller pieces that are related to the massive works in the middle. It is very grand and lovely.

    We spent two hours there. Sadly, the temporary exhibit of Pink Floyd artifacts was sold out when we tried to buy tickets.

    + + +

    The day itself was relatively pretty, and I suggested for the afternoon we take the three smaller children to the Diana, Princess of Wales Memorial Playground in Kensington Gardens. We would have lunch there from the food stand, and then stay and play. The promise of food brought the teen boys too, but once we got to the gardens they decided they’d rather explore. So I gave them money and off they went.

    The two little boys, on seeing the playground, refused to eat until they had been allowed in to play.

     

    I fed the 11yo first (chicken nuggets for her; caprese panini for me) while Mark went in with them, then came in and gave him a chance to go eat (stone-baked Parma ham and rocket pizza). My daughter volunteered to run around playing with the 3yo, and my 7yo was already making friends, so I felt free to walk around and explore the place myself.

    The playground is entirely fenced in, with one entrance by the food stand (it has one counter inside and one counter outside, and there are picnic tables on either side of the gate). To get in, you push a panel and, if you are an adult accompanying children under 12, a guardian buzzes you in. You must also be buzzed in to leave. So, while technically parents are supposed to supervise their children, once inside the playground children can run freely through numerous outdoor “rooms.”

    The playground has a Peter Pan theme. The pirate ship is glorious, with smaller rowboats on the side, some stable, some mounted on springs so they can be made to rock hard left and right. The Lost Boys’ house is a clearing encircled by a wooden fort, with slides and log bridges:

     

     

    The lagoon looks like it might be a fountain in the summer, and even now there are fountains that send water in when children work them. Tantalizing shapes and objects are embedded in the concrete to look like prints in the sand: the mark of a rope, planks washed ashore, rocks arranged in the form of a crocodile. Plus shells and other small treasures.

    There is a pathway that leads to an ring of trees, with a standing column of black rock in the center, that darkens and filters the sunlight to a creepy gloom. And there is a section of outdoor musical instruments, like a polished piece of granite deeply cut so that a smack will set it ringing with a bell tone, and percussion instruments, and this panel of metal spring-mounted squares that each sound a different note when you jump on them.

    Read the final paragraph on the explanatory board: “It is now recognized that risk taking is an important element of play and physical development.

    Bravo! I guess the Queen is just not all that worried about being sued if a child breaks her arm. Take another look at that pirate ship:

    While we were there, a girl of about seven climbed the ropes to the topmost horizontal crossbar and worked her way out to the end. She clearly knew what she was doing. It was a joy to watch.

    After a while, the teen boys came back, having explored the vast grounds of Kensington Gardens and then gone to Tesco for the £3 lunch special.

    My 13yo son was SO pained that he was technically too much grown to play in this playground. I could see his eyes sparkling when they lit on the pirate ship.

    We let him go in as “accompaniment” to the 3yo, with a careful admonition not to get in the way of younger children. And bought more food (the 3yo polished off nearly all of a New York Style Hot Dog with mustard, and ice cream novelties were had). And stayed still longer.

    I think maybe we were there about two and a half hours? And it was one of the more fun playground afternoons I have had.

    I don’t know why American playgrounds have not adopted the very, very sensible European practice of putting a fence around playgrounds and having only one exit. Even if you don’t have a guardian buzzing kids in and out, this makes it so much easier to safely supervise multiple kids: park yourself where you can see the exit, and you can watch in peace. Unless you have the sort of child who will climb the fence against strict instructions (and I know some of us do, true, but for most a fence can be a hard boundary), a one-exit fence is the kind of safety precaution that allows for more freedom and independent risk-taking for the children inside it.

    + + +

    Mark and the 17yo walked to get carryout from Nando’s for dinner: piles of wings and fries, and some salad and corn on the cob.

    “One of the things that’s great about British food,” says my 17yo, “is that you never have to worry, when you look at a menu, about whether you should get medium spicy, hot, or extra hot. Wings, vindaloo, whatever. Just order the hottest level always. You never have to worry that it will be too hot. Hottest is generally just right here.”

    So far, this has turned out to be correct.

    + + +

    After dinner, Mark and I headed out with our tickets for Young Frankenstein at the Garrick Theatre, a building which was financed by W. S. Gilbert.

    This show is a retooling of Mel Brooks’ original Broadway production, clearly an attempt to do something similar to what he managed with The Producers. It got mixed reviews in NY and has been tightened up from three hours to two. The monster is played here by the same actor who played him on Broadway.

    Poster outside the theatre:

    Interior of the theater. It’s very cozy! We had front row balcony seats. I like balconies because of the wide point of view, and here it was definitely a good economic choice, as we were still quite close to the action.

    Theatre selfie:

    About the show itself: The audience around us appeared to eat it up, but I have to wonder what proportion of Brits are the sort of people who have seen the Mel Brooks movie often enough to quote it from start to finish. Because when you’re steeped in the movie, like we are, it is a standard that no adaptation can live up to. Every departure from it, however necessary for the stage, is a step down.

    It’s also a good deal bawdier than the film. “What knockers!”/”Thank you, doctor” is positively understated compared to the new Brooks-authored musical numbers. You know how people say that Brooks could never make Blazing Saddles today? He couldn’t put these musical numbers on the big screen, I think. They’re not obscene, and they’re not unfunny, but they’re also not inoffensive and may cross lines that
    would make too many people uncomfortable. One song plays physical domestic abuse for laughs, for example. And some of it just works a little too hard, expecting bawdiness to stand in for actual humor. There were a couple moments where I cringed a little for the actors.

    Still: The six cast members were all talented, with good strong voices. Igor’s physical comedy was very effective. Inga’s role called for an impressive display of both gymnastics and yodeling. The actors in the roles of Frau Blucher, Hermit/Kemp, and Monster inhabited the demeanor of the movie characters pretty well. The fiancé wasn’t really anything like Madeline Kahn (more rich bimbo) but her demeanor was funny in its own way. And the sheer impossibility of filling the shoes of Gene Wilder had me rooting for the American-accented star, who was game for the challenge and, I think, did a fine job.

    The ensemble sounded good. The dancing could have been a little more tightly executed, but I have high standards and maybe they were going for a rougher look. There were a few new one-liners tossed in that worked very well. All in all, I did have fun. But I am glad I didn’t spend money on a ticket—though they were not unreasonably priced, both together cost us less than £100—for either teenage boy.

    And if I was looking for an ordinary London experience, I thought, as we exited the theater onto Charing Cross still alive with light from the windows of pubs, and walked past the line of black cabs there to be hailed from the curb, I had certainly had one.

    We stopped at a pub on the way home for one quick pint (Fuller’s HSB for me, Red Fox for Mark), long enough to agree that the Sam Smith’s are much superior, and walked back through Covent Garden, the bricks gleaming in the streetlight, the streets still relatively crowded at 10:30 p.m. on a Monday.


  • Mass, Harrods, Science Museum again, and a lot of drinks at the pub.

    I got up in the morning for 9am Mass at St. Etheldreda’s, the oldest building currently in use as a Catholic Church in London, and either the oldest or second oldest in England. It was built between 1250 and 1290 as the chapel for the London residence of the Bishop of Ely, was taken over by the Church of England, and was purchased by a congregation of Catholic fathers in the 19th century. They restored it, with beautiful windows that are worthy of their medieval setting, and statues of the English martyrs between the tall windows on the sides. The windows receive considerable light due to the lack of tall buildings around.
    It is a little jewel of a chapel; you can see the interior at this link.
    Entering between the light stone pillars, you walk back alongside the chapel, where you can see a glimpse through a door to the undercroft, set with tables and chairs like any parish hall; up stone stairs and you go in at the back.
    There is no electric lighting. The light for Mass came from the windows and from a few candles.
    + + +
    Mass itself was a bit odd. It was the shortest Sunday Mass I had ever attended at 24 minutes. The priest skipped the second reading, the entire homily, and the prayers of the faithful. And by skipped, I mean completely omitted. I have been to Masses where the homily was two sentences long, but existed. There was no homily at all, and the second reading was just gone, the way it is gone at a daily Mass. I didn’t know you could do that.
    There was another American family behind us, and they were whispering to their children in confused tones.
    But the Liturgy of the Eucharist went down as expected, so…
    At any rate, odd as it was, it could not detract from the serenity of the setting.
    + + +
    After Mass I split up from the 17yo (he would go on to have a day-long adventure, involving finding the highest building he could go up in for free, enjoying the view, buying an amazing lunch for only £3 at Tesco, letting his phone die, getting lost, figuring it out, finding a way to charge his phone on the fly—he remembered me saying there was an Apple Store in Covent Garden—and finally being able to call Mark to let him into the apartment, since he hadn’t had a key).
    I went out for breakfast at a corner café.

    Spicy tomato juice, eggs Benedict—perfect except poached a bit hard—and two cups of coffee.

    Then I came back, picked up two kids, and took them to see Harrods.

    The 13yo split off from us to walk around on his own and buy lunch.

    Me? I suddenly realized I was about to have a migraine and hurried desperately through the gilded and granite entry, holding the 11yo tightly by the hand to keep from losing her in the crowd, in search of water to take my sumatriptan tablet.

    The directory said there was a coffee shop in the basement, so I hoped to buy a bottle of water, but when I got there it turned out, like everything else, to be Exquisite, and was “wait to be seated” only. I stood there for a moment, and then plunged into the shop, accosted a waitress, and essentially begged for a glass of water to take my medication. I may have been pale and trembling by then. She kindly gave me one, and let me sit in the booth for a moment. Hurray.

    + + +

    That over, I knew I wouldn’t feel well for a while, so we walked slowly and looked and looked. Fortunately, you can feast more sumptuously with the eyes than with the stomach.

    Oh my. The Harrods food hall:

     

     

    From there we went up to the Toy Kingdom:

    The LEGO Harrods:

    There were some things out for demonstration. My daughter loved this RC car.

    W
    e found the 13yo in the Porsche Design accessories department, where they sell sunglasses and watches, playing this driving simulator that was set up there:

    Then we walked to the Science Museum for a go. Google Maps took us through a neighborhood with something-Mews as its street name, and indeed, the houses were made of former stables:

    I passed through the Making the Modern World exhibit again with them, and caught items I had missed the first time. Look! Dr. Jenner’s own lancets!
    An engineering exhibit allowed kids to build computer models of various systems and then run simulations. Both kids (with some others) played for a while at a game of building a model Mars Rover, with different numbers of differently sized and located wheels, then running it over a simulated Mars surface to see how it performs.
    The 13yo got tired and wanted to rest on a comfy cushioned bench in this dark room, so the 11yo and I went exploring in the Mathematics gallery.

    Touchable model of a control unit for a 1968 Honeywell computer:

    And this room-sized marvel, the Hartree Differential Analyzer, which solved differential equations by integrating with an analogue machine:

    A “logic demonstrator:”

     

    An energy game in which windmilling your arms did, I don’t know, a thing:

    We collected the 13yo in the main gallery and headed home, rather tired.

    They’ve gotten quite good at standing on the right.

    Mark and I went to the grocery store and picked up ready-to-eat odds and ends (salad with crunchy carrots and sweet corn; cold roast-beef-and-Stilton sandwich) and a few things to go in the oven: pizza, prawn toast, egg rolls, gyoza. We all ate our fill, and then Mark and I headed out into the night, aiming for another pub.

    This time, The Cock.

    + + +

    I want to say right now that Mark and I owe the heartiest thanks to reader and commenter Kathgreenwood for suggesting that we follow the map of Samuel Smith’s pubs when looking for a place to spend the evening.

    They are top-notch. No music or television, just a place where people gather, drink, and talk. Beautifully upkept—we watched the barkeep carefully polishing the already-gleaming brass with gloved hands:

    And the beer? The best.

    Old Brewery Bitter has been the best of the cask-conditioned ales I’ve had while here. Today we branched out. I started with a pint of Extra Stout and Mark a pint of IPA. Then we switched to the fruit beer. I stuck with apricot, and Mark tried strawberry:

    Before tasting he stuck the glass under my nose. “Sniff,” he ordered.

    I inhaled deeply, closed my eyes. After a moment, I said: “Jam.”

    It smelled exactly like a freshly opened jar of home-canned strawberry jam. Not the vegetal notes of a fresh raw strawberry, but the scent of simmered, sugared fruit. Then I tasted.

    Readers, if you taste this, you may never call a mere red wine “jammy” again.

    It is sweeter and more fruit-forward than the apricot, the beer taste not blending so much as fading into the background. It isn’t as balanced; while I could see drinking the apricot with certain spicy meals, as you might drink plum wine or Gewurztraminer, this was dessert. Delicious, strawberry dessert.

     

    + + +

    Partway through the fruit beer we started reading about the abovementioned differential analyzer, which was famously built for the first time using an off-the-shelf children’s erector set (Meccano) with a few specially made parts, namely a polished glass disc and a steel knife-edged integrator wheel. We tried to work out how it worked, with the help of an article about it I found from a New Zealand enthusiasts’ club.

    While digital computers are the descendants of finger-counting and abacuses and arithmetical algorithms, the article explained, analog computers like the integrator are the descendants of graphical solutions and surveying equipment.
    They are called “analog” because they rely on proportions and ratios: a physical quantity is input into the machine, and transformed by proportion into a quantity inside the machine that is mechanically manipulated and may be output via another proportional transformation.

    We figured out how the disc and wheel work pretty quickly. Rotation of a polished glass disc through a certain number of radians is one step along the x axis in a finite-difference algorithm. Resting on the disc, and rolling as the disc turns, measuring arc distance, is a steel integrator wheel. The wheel’s radial distance from the center of the disc, as the disc turns through x radians, is controllable: by moving it towards the center or rim as the disc turns, you are inputting the function y(x) to be integrated. The arc length it rolls out over a differential turn of the disc is y dx. Count how many rotations the wheel makes as the disc turns, and you are finding the area under the curve.

    It took much pointing and literal handwaving, and another pint of beer, for us to make sense of the other important part, the torque amplifier:

    p

    The torque amplifier is necessary because there’s very little friction between wheel and disc, and yet the output shaft has to drive a bunch of other parts downstream in order for you to produce something you can read, like a plot.

    I will leave it as an exercise for the reader. Or you can just move on to my review of:

    Sam Smith’s Organic Chocolate Stout.

    You thought the fruit beers were dessert? This tastes like frothy cocoa, in a beer.

    Only because it is full of cocoa, and sugar.

    Purists might object to putting cocoa and sugar in a beer. These purists would be wrong.

    I may be ruined for life, and spend all my beer shopping time seeking out rare Sam Smith’s beers in Minneapolis.

    + + +

    Odd display along Regent Street on the way home. Apparently there are American football teams playing in the U. K., sponsored by Mexico. Go figure.

    This was by far the most fun evening that I have had here. Two and a quarter pints of beer might be the reason, or it was the company, or the force diagrams. Perhaps the lovely pub atmosphere, the stamped-tin ceiling and the brass. The barkeeps who were happy to explain why there were little glass louvers mounted at eye level above the bar (historical class separation: open to order your drink, close to maintain the illusion that the workingmen behind the bar would not hear the gentlefolk’s conversation). The quartet of tattooed folks at the next table, who were there when we arrived and still there when we left just at closing time.

    I thought it was oversold, but there is really nothing at all like “the pub” at home. Everything that is sort of like it, isn’t even close: the coffee shop, the brewpub, the bar and grill, the neighborhood bar, the neighborhood café, the country club, the bed and breakfast, even the occasional “British Pub Themed Restaurant,” none of them have all the pieces. Such a beautiful thing—I sincerely hope that Londoners appreciate this thing that they have on practically every corner.

    I have been to Paris, Rome, Seville, Madrid, Toronto, Lisbon, Marrakech, Lyon, Florence, Nice, and a handful of small towns (not to mention a number of large U.S. cities). In all seriousness, London sweeps them all aside. Heart, stolen.


  • Borough Market; Split up in Southwark.

    What do you do on Saturday in London? All the guidebooks describe everything as “crowded weekends, so go on a weekday.”
    Well, Borough Market is only Thursday through Saturday, so this was our last chance.
    We took the tube to Bank, hoping to change to the Northern Line to cross the river.
    But after descending many stairs encountered a gate. The Northern Line was closed.
    The easiest thing to do was also fairly pleasant: a walk across London Bridge. “I hope it’s not falling down!” I said to the 7yo, who (as I predicted) thought that was terribly witty. You can see Tower Bridge in the distance.
    At the south end of London Bridge is the spike that our Yeoman Warder said was kept handy just in case they ever have to put somebody’s head on it in the future. Mark thinks this will never happen.
    Knowing, though, that World War I and World War II spies were executed specifically in the Tower specifically for its symbolic value, as late as 1940, and believing firmly that a society’s civil behavior is only a surface that can be easily swept away with the right motivations, I am not so sure.
    Though maybe this spike will prove to be impractically tall and the point too brittle.
    I believe that things will go south again someday for the people of this island, as I believe they will for people everywhere eventually. I have a sort of romantic notion, because it is so very old, predating all the proper records, that the City of London will still exist as an entity when the dust settles.
    And a cynical notion (or is this still the romantic one?) that it will manage its survival in part by putting heads on pikes again.

    Metaphorically?

    Maybe.

    + + +

    Off to Borough Market, which at around eleven was not quite a complete crush of people. We had to pass through a crushing bottleneck at one end, where we were squeezed between a wall and a bar with outdoor seating (I glimpsed a tray full of brimming pitchers of Pimm’s Cup but was not able to stop and neglect my family long enough to run up to the bar and ask for one).

    But when we popped out the other side it was no longer crushing, only crowded; there were many people milling around, looking and deciding perhaps, but once you made up your mind to buy something you only had to wait behind one or two other people.

    The man at the liquorice stand got plenty of business from us.

    I also bought, for our dinner tonight: spiced-pear chutney, two cheeses of sorts recommended to me by the chutney-seller (a creamy blue and a soft runny cheese, but both carefully selected to be mild so that the children might like them; I needn’t have bothered), and two proper-looking Bavarian soft pretzels. The 17-yo asked for some clementine-like citrus fruits that he had sampled and declared amazing, and Mark chose three saucissons from a seller.

    Then we had lunch! At first we thought we might find a table in one of the restaurants around the edges, then we thought we might leave to find a restaurant, and finally Mark decided he would stake out a spot near a bench and keep the 3yo while the rest of us fanned out to find food. “Just buy me lunch,” he instructed, “well, lunch for you and for me and for the two little boys,” so I took the 7yo and headed towards where we had seen an array of sellers of hot food.

    A thing about the 7yo is that he does not like sandwiches of any kind, so we took a while in finding a not-sandwich. He agreed to a meat pie that promised to be filled with beef chili, beans, and cheddar. Relieved to have found something for the 7yo, I bought Mark a meat pie filled with beef and smoky bacon, plus mash on the side, no gravy; and a couple of sausage rolls for the 3yo, hoping that he would like them.

    I delivered the child and the food to Mark, who had found a place to sit, and went off to find something for myself.

    Börek!

    Mine was filled with seasoned spinach and soft tangy cheese, and served with a pile of spicy chickpeas in a nest of hummus, with green chili relish.

    SO GOOD.

    I let the 17yo (who was contentedly deep in a meat pie) have a bite, and he thought mine was better than his.

    And the 3yo adored the sausage roll! The pastry shattered into little bits all over his pants, but he was very happy. I may have to try making these at home. At least I know what to feed him (other than square bread and orange cheese sandwiches) for the next week.

    Sadly, the 7yo did not approve of the chili pie, so he had to settle for eating a bunch of candy for lunch. Poor kid.

    As for Mark, well, in my rush to get him something with bacon in it I had forgotten that pie is not really his thing. He ate it and it was fine, and he was perfectly nice about it, and of course he had told me I should just get him any kind of food, but I felt bad anyway, just from my own spousal misfire. I had failed to blow his mind as I had hoped with amazing meatiness and bacon and gravy sealed in a flaky crust, because pie is not the sort of thing that blows his mind.

    I always forget this. B
    ecause what kind of person doesn’t think pie is super awesome.

    Sigh. I’ll do better next time. Why don’t they sell meat crumble?

    + + +

    The 2 pm show at the Old Operating Theatre was billed as unsuitable for kids under 7. I volunteered to skip it and take a turn with the 3yo. On my back, he could ride along with me to the Tate Modern. Maybe we could meet up afterwards and go to the Globe if the kids weren’t tired, or we could just call it a day.

    Mark was on the “just call it a day” team. I thought we could leave it open, perhaps. #foreshadowing #MarkWasRight

    + + +

    I love just walking through cities and seeing the sights and people, and so for me, the South Bank of the Thames, between London Bridge and the Millennium Bridge, was pure delight. I was so glad to be there on that I went into the first souvenir shop and bought the 3yo a toy red bus for £3.99.

    This random purchase turned out to be a good value, as he chatted to himself about it for nearly the whole walk that followed, and only dropped it a couple of times. He was also happy to get a penny in change.

    “…their virtues we write in water.”

    The line outside the Globe was super long. I texted this information to Mark. He was in the Old Operating Theatre museum with the kids waiting for the show. We had this exchange:
     
     
    On to the Tate:

    With an impatient 3yo on my back, I couldn’t stay long. Enough to get a sense of the building, its space and its contents. It is sprawly, with large rooms, in two towers connected at floors 1 and 4 by bridges.

    I saw a Matisse:

    Also a Kandinsky and a Picasso and a Calder.

    There was a delightful installation of a plate-glass disc, suspended vertically on the ceiling in a small cube of a room and steadily rotating. A spotlight was trained on it from the side; the disc had been treated somehow to reflect blue light and to transmit yellow, so as the disc rotated it cast a blue reflection that revolved around the room, growing and eclipsing with the angle of reflection; and it cast a stationary yellow reflection that also grew and eclipsed. The moving blue spot collided with the stationary yellow spot every time it came around, of course, at the same moment that each shrank to a line’s width, and the 3yo cried, “Bang!”

    I liked this, Gordon Bennett’s Possession Island (Abstraction), acrylics, 1991:

    And this, a sort of Tower of Babel made of old radios, all tuned to different stations:

    And this, William Roberts’ The Diners, oil, 1919:

    And this installation (it’s a long story; the artist started, performatively, by engaging a village to make wheaten wreaths for her annually; she had to stop; she tried different means to preserve the art somehow; she settled on sealing the wreaths in metal “tins” in which they are presumably decaying.)

    The 3yo had had enough, so we started on a walk back to the flat, via the Millennium Bridge.

     
    It affords lovely views. I enjoyed the walk and so did my little partner.
     

    I got a new view of St. Paul’s in a reflective ball on the other side. Unfortunately, it’s dented right where you would get a full straight angle at the dome.

    Around past the side of St. Paul’s. Take that, Mary Poppins:

    Many photos of ordinary London street scenes, like this:

    Postman’s Park, a little green jewel of a space, contained this intriguing sheltered wall of glazed-tile texts:

    It is a work of private art for the public, a memorial to everyday heroes.

     

    I enjoyed the many-layered angles of this view through a building to who-knows-where (besides the City Thameslink, that is):

    I crossed the Holborn Viaduct, its rails brightly painted, studded with these dragons that remind us we are within the jurisdiction of the ancient City of London. A worker on the opposite side of the bridge had a big fluffy duster on a pole, and was carefully dusting the metal lions at the other end.

    A glimpse through a gate.

    Fleet Street.

    I passed the Temple Bar memorial, and turned to get a photo of its dragon in the center of the street.

    I stopped at the grocery store before finally coming back to the flat. Mark and the other kids had arrived only minutes before me. He left again to take some of the kids to Mass (I planned to go Sunday morning early, along with the 17yo), and, after resting a while watching “Horrible Histories” DVDs, I set up a dinner.

    Pretzels, cheeses and chutneys from Borough market, apricot Wensleydale, saucissons. And hummus and veg and cut mango and blueberries and crackers and Irish soda bread and leftover chicken soup. And a bottle of red wine, Montepulciano from a store somewhere around here.

    We were tired, and I planned to get up early; so off to bed for me.