bearing blog


bear – ing n 1  the manner in which one comports oneself;  2  the act, power, or time of bringing forth offspring or fruit; 3 a machine part in which another part turns [a journal ~];  pl comprehension of one’s position, environment, or situation;   5  the act of moving while supporting the weight of something [the ~ of the cross].


  • Mathematics, music, and hearing: Vi Hart does it again.

    This, one of the videos from the remarkable Vi Hart, is absolutely brilliant.  It's twelve minutes long and worth every minute.  Watch with your kids.

    (Incidentally, Vi Hart has recently been hired by Salman Khan to make videos for the Khan Academy.  Hard to imagine a better match.)


  • Information flow.

    This is very good news:  The Chronicle of Higher Education is reporting that JSTOR, the database of academic journals, is about to beta-test a system that will allow users to access a limited number of journal articles for free.

    It’s about to get a little easier—emphasis on “a little”—for users without subscriptions to tap JSTOR’s enormous digital archive of journal articles. In the coming weeks, JSTOR will make available the beta version of a new program, Register & Read, which will give researchers read-only access to some journal articles, no payment required. All users have to do is to sign up for a free “MyJSTOR” account, which will create a virtual shelf on which to store the desired articles.

    But there are limits. Users won’t be able to download the articles; they will be able to access only three at a time, and there will be a minimum viewing time frame of 14 days per article, which means that a user can’t consume lots of content in a short period. Depending on the journal and the publisher, users may have an option to pay for and download an article if they choose.

    To start, the program will feature articles from 70 journals.

    This is an exciting development.  The Internet is a wonderful thing, but it has always frustrated me that it's comparatively difficult to access peer-reviewed research.  I know, it has always been possible to buy reprints of journal articles you want to read ($30 a pop is not an atypical charge), and it has always been possible (for me, an able-bodied resident of a major urban area) to trek physically to the libraries at the state university and do my searching from there, but face it … with these obstacles, it's always been easier just to do the best one can with Wikipedia.  

    Besides, at least when I was working on my graduate degree, I found that I generally didn't know if an article was going to be useful until after I'd read it.  That makes me rather unwilling to arrange childcare and cross town for a single article, or to pay $30 for the privilege of accessing it.  

    Make no mistakes, the program described in the Chronicle is severely limited:  few people, however self-motivated, will be able to conduct significant independent research at the rate of six articles a month (partly because of that phenomenon I described — with the exception of seminal "classic" papers or comprehensive literature reviews, it's hard to tell whether an article is useful until after you've read it).   But maybe this will be a step forward into a new era that makes independent scholarship more accessible to everyone.   As Alexis Madrigal at the Atlantic points out, 

    Why is this important? Well, get a load of this stat. JSTOR told the Chronicle that each and every year, they turn away 150 million attempts to gain access to articles. That's right. 150 million attempts! 

    The way I see it, that's 150 million chances lost to improve the quality of the Internet. JSTOR, as the keeper of so much great scholarly work, should be one of the Internet's dominant suppliers of facts and serious research. But if something is not publicly available, key gatekeepers like journalists and Wikipedians, move to the best available source, even if they know that there probably is a better source behind JSTOR's paywall. 

    150 million potential pageviews is a lot of potential transactions, and if awareness grew that you could actually access the content of scholarly journals, it's likely there would be many more.  If JSTOR can find a way to monetize these access attempts in a way that delivers decent bang-for-the-buck, a real win-win situation could be created:  profit for the journal, which after all has to pay the bills, and a more fluid — if not entirely "free" — flow of information.

    This would be good for everyone:  patients who need to understand the latest research about their own medical diagnoses, activists who want to marshall the best arguments to rally people to their causes, independent scholars who seek to educate themselves, high-school level home-educated students, high school teachers, tech professionals temporarily absent from the workforce who need to stay current in their field — and nerds like me who just like to go straight to the source and maybe blog about it.   It could be good for the journals, too.


  • Taubes responds to “The Fat Trap,” among other things.

    In response to the NYT Well Blog post "The Fat Trap," which I mentioned briefly here, Gary Taubes has posted several items.

    Taubes' post is here.  It includes links to:

    • a letter to the NYT signed by 250 health professionals and researchers
    • a new blog by a colleague of his entitled "The War on Insulin";
    • and an announcement of a new weight loss registry for those who attempted to lose weight via the paleo/low carb route.  

    Check it out.


  • Book review, part 1: Willpower: Rediscovering the Greatest Human Strength.

    This past week I finished reading Willpower:  Rediscovering the Greatest Human Strength by Roy Baumeister and John Tierney.  I recommend it.  

    As nonfiction goes, it’s a fairly light and quick read, and interesting:  I would rank it with Brian Wansink’s Mindless Eating in the pop psychology genre. [Editing note:  Although Wansink’s work has been largely discredited due to substantiated allegations of p-hacking.]  Like those Wansink describes, some of the psychological experiments that Tierney and Baumeister recount (most of which were designed and executed by others) are interesting and creative.  Interesting, creative, and cruel:  I really, really felt bad for some of the experimental subjects, who had to do things like

    1. first, fast for many hours
    2. then, hungry, be ushered into a waiting room filled with the smell of baking cookies
    3. sit next to a bowl of freshly baked chocolate chip cookies and be told “Those aren’t for you, here, have one of these nice crunchy radishes instead”
    4. finally be given “intelligence tests” which consisted of puzzles that, in fact, had no solution, the point being to measure how long the subjects sweated over them before they gave up trying.

    The book also includes material gleaned from a handful of celebrities, either from interviews or from excerpts from memoirs.  Not sure why they had to be celebrities, but they do make for interesting stories.  How Drew Carey looked at his messy desk, said “Shit, man, I’m rich,” and hired David Allen (of Getting Things Done) to work with him as a personal organizer for a year.  How Eric Clapton stopped drinking, and speculations as to how AA’s “abandon yourself to a higher power” thing can work even for atheists.  How performance artist Amanda Palmer maintained composure as a living statue, standing perfectly still for three hours a day even in the face of people trying to anger or amuse her, and how it affected her for hours afterward.  There’s also a historical discussion of Henry Stanley (he of “Dr. Livingstone, I presume?”) and how his memoirs hint that he could maintain discipline — both of himself and of the men under his command — through truly horrific conditions.

    But the real gem of Willpower is the insights it suggests from research, some of which are surprising — but which explain a lot.  I hinted at this in a blog post I wrote  about sticking to your resolutions, which drew on an article written by Tierney, and also you can see a New York Times review of the book here which summarizes it pretty well.

    Before getting into the specific insights, though, let’s talk about the problem posed by the very idea of “willpower” itself.   Some people, to be blunt, believe there is no such thing, pointing to various research findings that convincingly show that we are so often driven by forces of which we are not conscious.  Others are wary of bringing up the possibility because it smacks so much of blaming people for the situation they find themselves in, which may largely be because of forces outside their control.  

    In the obesity research world, there is a lot of evidence out there that “lack of willpower” is not the root reason for much of the obesity problem.  Take Gary Taubes’s two books, Good Calories, Bad Calories (I reviewed it here) and Why We Get Fat (I reviewed it here, here, here).  Both of them make a very convincing case that intractable obesity is caused by a biochemical vicious cycle that is triggered by exposure — maybe even as early as in utero! — to a diet of sugars and other refined carbohydrates.   The cravings and the difficulty resisting them are both products of broken hormonal signals, according to this model, and so you simply cannot say that obesity can be “fixed” through application of willpower alone to resist the temptation to overeat.  From Good Calories, Bad Calories:  “Though the traditional response to the failure of semi-starvation diets to produce long-term weight loss has been to blame the fat person for a lack of willpower… [some] have argued that this failure is precisely the evidence that tells us positive caloric balance or overeating is not the underlying disorder in obesity.”

    So let’s stipulate for the purposes that this is true:  our decisions to give in, or not to give in, very often come from unconscious processes, or biochemical urges, or explicable impulses.  How do Tierney and Baumeister deal with that?  And the answer is that they  do it through a careful — and useful — definition of the terms “will” and “willpower.”

    The will is to be found in connecting units across time…. Will involves treating the current situation as part of a general pattern… You must treat (almost) every episode [of temptation] as a reflection of a general need to resist these temptations.

    That’s where conscious self-control comes in, and that’s why it makes the difference between success and failure in just about every aspect of life.

    The way I read it is this:  We may have no conscious and immediate control over the impulses that overtake us, the urges and cravings and temptations.  They may come from our environment or from chemical signals inside us.  And we may have little conscious and immediate control over the strength of our resistance against those impulses:  once the impulse has begun, if we are “caught out,” there may be little we can do to fight against them.  

     

    But we do have power to predict the impulses that may overtake us in the future, and we can take steps to prepare.  We can shape our environment so that they meet us on a battleground we have chosen, or we can avoid meeting them at all.  We can also whip ourselves into shape so that we have a better chance at resisting even if we are surprised by our impulses.

    That is where the “will” part of “willpower” comes in.

    + + +

    In a future post, I’ll list some of the insights from the book that resonated with me.  Some of them, I met with a sense of recognition, as a general form of the specific insights that I discovered for myself during my weight loss and subsequent struggles with maintenance.  Finally, I’ll discuss how I think people can harness these insights to hammer out a plan of action for personal change.

    (I think I can write with some conviction and experience about how to harness willpower to overcome the specific fault of gluttony.  What I’d really like to do, though, is figure out how to harness it to overcome faults I’m still mired in.  Maybe, through continued writing about gluttony, I can see a way to draw analogies that will create a map to escape from those other faults as well.)

     

    [Editing note.  Years and years later, I wish I’d done a better job distinguishing gluttony from other problems with food, like clinical eating disorders and other kinds of compulsiveness.  

    I want to emphasize that, whereas I identified some behaviors in myself that probably qualified as self-centered gluttony in the technical sense, I am not and never have been qualified to make that distinction for anyone else.

    I hope to add some commentary to all the posts that have this problem as I find the time to review them.  Here’s a more recent post where I acknowledge some of the problematic material I wrote and set new ground rules for myself going forward.]


  • A bit of a placeholder.

    We've had a 12-hour stomach bug layered on top of a nasty cold, both of them percolating through all the family members, for the last few days.  I thought for sure I'd have time  to blog something today, but somehow between making chicken soup and running to the store for Gatorade and saltines I just don't have the energy.  Will be back when I can!



  • Strength training or no strength training?

    Got a reader email this morning:

    Maybe you've mentioned this on the blog at some point when I wasn't payingattention, but I can't recall seeing it.

    Since I joined the Y  six weeksago, everywhere I go, I hear about the importance of strength training.How, with only cardio, people get skinny-fat and have high body fat percentages because they're burned muscle along with fat. Do you incorporate strength training into your workouts? How so?

    So, my answer is "not really, but kind of sort of."  Here's what I wrote back:

    One of the reason I chose swimming as my main form of exercise (besides the fact that, compared to running, it's more fun) is that swimming is inherently strengthening — at least somewhat — because you're always moving against theresistance of the water.

    Swimming is not great cardio, and it's not great strength-training (it's probably insufficient for warding off osteoporosis because it doesn't load the bones along their lengths), but it's one of the few things you can do that combine both pretty well.

    Like my reader, I have small kids and not tons of time.  At this time in my life I can't imagine going to the gym for "just weights." I feel like I need to do cardio every time I have a chance to go to the gym. So, the short answer is that I don't do *separate* strength training,but I always swim once or twice a week.  That being said, when I am ready to make weightlifting a priority, the first place I should start is in bone-loading exercises, because that's what my routine is missing.  (I do get impact workouts from running once a week.)

    If you, like me, are attracted by multitasking exercise, there are at least two other things you can do at the Y that incorporate both cardio and strength training.  These are the kettlebells classes and the Body Pump classes (Body Pump is sort of aerobics-with-barbells).   Fitness Yoga is a fun entry-level class that is surprisingly grueling, even if it only uses bodyweight.  

    Another alternative if you use cardio machines is to design a workout that incorporates weight machines and cardio — either some kind of circuit training, or steal a little time from your cardio workout to use weight machines at the beginning and/or end. If I were going to go that route I'd probably sign up for a personal training session to help me figure out the most efficient use of my time.  I hear it is money well spent, and you may well be able to snag a free personal training session during member appreciation events.

    If you want to read a really great site about strength training, particularly for women, I totally recommend Mistress Krista's enormous site at www.stumptuous.com . Very empowering, logical, evidence-based, and no-nonsense — if you like the way I write, I think you'll like her, probably even more! Check out her articles on free weights especially, for example her series on the squat — here's Part 2, "Why Squat?"

    Side note:  Now that I've been over to Mistress Krista's, I feel shame at having neglected weight bearing exercise and must go flagellate myself, perhaps with a kettlebell.  Fortunately, I know darn well that I don't have time today, so swimming during my daughter's swim lesson will have to be it…

     


  • Tweaking the recipe: yeah, yet another maintenance post.

    I have a Plexiglas frame stuck with magnets to my fridge, displaying in table form the Bread Machine S.O.P. Down the left side is a column of ingredients: milk, egg, coconut oil, sugar, whole wheat flour, bread flour, gluten, etc. The other columns are labeled at the top with the names of bread recipes: whole wheat sandwich, honey oatmeal, cinnamon raisin; and as you go down the column you see how much of each ingredient to use. At the bottom of the page are button-by-button directions for starting the bread machine.

    I set that up some time ago so that Mark and the older kids could easily make a loaf of bread without needing to be walked through the steps. Before I could do that, of course, I had to develop a sort of personalized, foolproof standard recipe for each one. I started with the recipes that came with my bread machine and adapted them over many loaves until each had the right amount of salt, the right level of sweetness, and the right balance between liquid and my favorite brand of whole wheat flour. Once I had a good recipe that worked pretty much all the time, it got enshrined in the Bread Machine S.O.P.

    I haven’t added a new one in quite a long time, but after my stint in Cincinnati at Christmas I found myself craving more of the ubiquitous-in-southwestern-Ohio soft dark pumpernickel bread (Klosterman’s Cincinnati Dark Rye being the classic example: http://www.klostermanbakery.com/products/grocery/cincinnati-dark-rye-bread ). That’s all I need, another food item I can’t get unless I am in Ohio! So I bought some dark rye flour and set out to develop my own recipe for the S.O.P.

    After hemming and hawing over several online pumpernickel bread recipes, I decided to start with a basic recipe of one cup each whole wheat flour, dark rye flour, and bread flour; 3 Tbsp butter; 10 oz whole milk; 2 Tbsp each molasses and unsweetened cocoa; 2 tsp salt; 1.5 tsp yeast; 1 egg; and 1 Tbsp of gluten. The bread baked up nicely, but I decided the molasses flavor was far too pronounced, so that is where I will begin my tweaking. My very next loaf of bread will have white sugar instead of molasses; we shall see if the molasses is even necessary. I may try half-and-half next after that, and perhaps if I can find some I will experiment with some kind of malt syrup or malted barley flour. When I get the sweetener figured out, I will turn to the flour ratios. In any case, I will be making lots of pumpernickel loaves in a row.

    As I added “rye flour” and “pastrami” to my shopping list, I reflected on this idea. When I am trying to tweak, I like to tweak as fast as I can. I want to lay the questions to rest so I can close the loop and say, “I’ve figured it out, now I don’t have to think about it anymore.” Even though my family will probably get sick of pumpernickel, by the end of the testing process I will know how to make the perfect loaf of Cincinnati dark rye to suit my cravings and the blend of flours that are available in my area. And the next time I want to make Reubens for dinner, we will be ready.

    I realized that this has also been my approach to tweaking weight maintenance behaviors. Right now, I am testing the theory that I should always have half sandwiches, and I am working on getting used to the habit of always cutting restaurant sandwiches in half, and always making half sandwiches at home. And what I am doing right now is ordering sandwiches every time I am in a restaurant, whether that is what I would like best or not, and eating only half of them (in fact I am sitting in front of the remains of a ham-and-egg croissant right now in an Eat Street diner). When it is practical, I do take the other half home for later, by the way. I am also making lots of half sandwiches for myself at home for lunch.

    And what I am finding is that, with practice, and the constant reminder that *this is what I am working on*, is rapidly forcing me to get comfortable with the practice. Half sandwiches are already starting to feel normal — and indeed, they seem to be the right amount. But what really helps is repeating it as frequently as I can, until I have laid the habit to rest.


  • “Daily Mass as the original ‘small group.’”

    Thoughtful reflection from Amy Welborn on the utility of "small groups" in Catholic parishes.

    When I go to daily Mass in this town, whereever  go, there are at least fifty people there.  During Advent and Lent, far more.

    Think about it – in your parish, during Lent, probably 200 people gather daily in a “small group.”

    They enjoy catechesis through the language of the liturgy itself, the Scripture readings and the homily.  They enjoy the deepest fellowship of all through the Eucharist – being joined not only to the others present but to ever Catholic throughout the world, in heaven, and to Christ himself.

    That catechesis, grace and fellowship are real. 

    …..when considering “small groups” in a Catholic parish…start with daily Mass. Thank God for what happens there…build on it…stop trying to invent, invent and invent some more.

    …and maybe follow the old guys for their after-Mass coffee at McDonald’s and then their morning at the St. Vincent de Paul thrift store.  Fellowship? Check. Works of Mercy? Check.

    Amy writes in the comments:

    When we start from “Wow..there’s no community in this humongous parish..how do we create and build it?” we are rather subtley declaring our dis-believe in the sacramental life of the Body of Christ.

    It should be more “We are in communion with each other and with the whole Body of Christ. That is so amazing and fantastic! How can we live this out and be Christ to each other and the world? How are we called to be like Christ crucified and poured out in love?”

    Yes.



  • In the book pile.

    Just jumping in here to say that I started reading that book on willpower that I mentioned in passing a couple of days ago and it's really, really interesting.  I am only on chapter two and I'm riveted.

    Here's a link to a NYT review of the book, Willpower:  Rediscovering the Greatest Human Strength by Roy Baumeister and John Tierney.

    I will be writing about this one when I finish it.

    I made a resolution last year to wait for new books to come from the library rather than making impulse purchases, but this one I couldn't stand waiting for any longer and after reading the review finally hit the "buy now" button for the Kindle edition.  I think there's probably some irony there, but I don't want to look too hard at it.


  • Beauty and luxury, through a child’s eyes.

    Hallie Lord has a guest post at Elizabeth Foss's blog that is worth looking at. She has long argued on her own blog, Betty Beguiles, for a proper understanding of the pursuit of feminine beauty or prettiness, as part of the vocation of mother and wife. Generally there she takes the "pretty is good" side, since so many women have a sort of fear of pretty — either because they worry it smacks of vanity and materialism, or because they don't have enough self-esteem to think they can pull it off.  

    Here she argues for the enjoyment of, shall we say, "girl stuff" (bubble bath, shoes, lipstick) for its own sake, for the sake of the pleasures we find in it.

    (To the extent that we like that kind of thing, of course. I'm not veryinto lipstick, for example. But to each girl their own girl stuff.

    I was reminded of just how much joy there is to be found in these things as I watched my three sweet small girls celebrate Christmas. I was struck by the glee with which they sought out their most beautiful dresses for Mass on Christmas Eve, the quiet delight they found in brushing one another’s hair with the new hairbrushes that they found tucked into their stockings, and the long hot bubble baths they insisted upon on Christmas afternoon.

    My daughters aren’t yet old enough to recognize that there might be value in doing any of these things for the benefit of others; they do them simply because they realize that which is easy for us busy Moms toforget: God created them (and us) for joy and the enjoyment of simple pleasures is their (and our) right.

    So often the love that many little girls have for "pretty stuff" is brushed off and even condemned: as evidence of cultural sexism or materialism or vanity or premature sexualization. But it's so nearly universal that I think there must be something naturally good in there too.

    I like the conceptof recapturing a little-child-like love for beautiful and luxurious things, as a way of guarding against vanity, by enjoying them as simple pleasures.  So much better than  raising them to more importance than they have,  or else erring in the other direction by thinking of them as worthless or even dangerous. All beauties have their proper place.