bearing blog


bear – ing n 1  the manner in which one comports oneself;  2  the act, power, or time of bringing forth offspring or fruit; 3 a machine part in which another part turns [a journal ~];  pl comprehension of one’s position, environment, or situation;   5  the act of moving while supporting the weight of something [the ~ of the cross].


  • What makes wives happy.

    According to a study by W. Bradford Wilcox and Steven Nock, published in the 3/06 volume of Social Forces, the top predictors, in order, of a woman’s marital happiness are:

    1. Her husband makes an effort to listen, regularly expresses affection and appreciation, and regularly shares quality time with her:  a constellation of behaviors that Wilcox and Nock name "emotional engagement."
    2. She perceives that housework and other family responsibilities are divided fairly.
    3. Her husband earns 68% or more of household income.
    4. She and her husband have a strong commitment to the "norm of lifelong marriage."  The example given:  a shared belief that "even unhappily married couples should stay together for the sake of the children."
    5. She does not work outside the home.
    6. She and her husband share attendance at religious services.
    7. She holds "traditional" attitudes about gender roles.

    Goodness.  No wonder things are going so well for me. 

    I told Mark about this.  He didn’t like the term "emotional engagement." 

    Emotionally engaged?  I don’t have to be "emotionally engaged."  Any rational person should know that emotions are an important factor that must be included in all calculations of how to behave.


  • What I learned today.

    If you have more than a few pieces of furniture from IKEA, and you have a two-year-old boy, don’t leave Allen wrenches lying about the house.


  • The gift that keeps on giving.

    Very funny, from breed ’em and weep.   Be sure to read the comments.

    Her mom must be a good sport.


  • Why exempt public schools from sex-abuse lawsuits?

    Amy Welborn points to this NCR article about efforts to oppose a Colorado bill, or rather certain language in a bill, that eliminates the statute of limitations for child-sex-abuse lawsuits — for some institutions that perpetrate the abuse of children.

    Why so much opposition?  Because it exempts public schools.

    According to the article, when a 17-year-old boy began his testimony about how the former president of the Estes Park, Colorado public school board molested him, the panel  chairman (Sen. Ron Tupa, a Boulder Democrat) walked out.  And the other committee members interrupted the teenager,  until he was finally ordered to stop giving his statement.

    This is rich:

    [Panel chairman Senator] Tupa, a social studies teacher in Colorado’s Boulder Valley School District, was absent for much of [Martin] Nussbaum’s testimony. Later, he told the Register he has seen no information to indicate a problem of sexual abuse in public schools.

    Perhaps if he’d stayed in his seat and listened (this was a hearing, after all) he would have seen some.   Here’s part of what he missed:

    Charol Shakeshaft, a Hofstra University researcher who prepared a federal report on public school sexual abuse, submitted written testimony to the Colorado Legislature that stated: “The physical sexual abuse of students in public schools is likely more than 100 times the abuse by priests.” Her testimony said most of the accused are shifted from one school to another and are seldom fired.

    Martin Nussbaum, an attorney for the Colorado Catholic Conference,… submitted written documentation of 103 cases of child sexual abuse in public schools in the past eight years that have resulted in teachers losing their licenses. Most license revocations came only after criminal convictions.

    A police investigator stated on the record:

    "…Any officer can tell you that the majority of sexual abuse against minors occurs in our public schools.”

    Lifting or at least extending the statute of limitations is probably not a bad idea.  But why exempt the institutions with the biggest problem?


  • Reverse-engineering the Suzuki method.

    I like to get out and about in the afternoons, but I don’t much like going to too many appointments in one week.  Already our family has swimming lessons on Tuesday evenings, an early-childhood music class on Monday mornings, and a monthly science class at the local nature center.  So I have been reluctant to add musical instrument lessons for Oscar, even though I’d like him to start.  The primary reason is my resistance to adding yet another specific time and place that I have to show up. 

    I only have one homeschooled child so far.  I can’t let this get out of hand so soon.

    The secondary reason:  I’m not sure that Oscar’s ready to handle an expensive musical instrument.  Every time I get my guitar out, if I turn my back for a moment, he can’t stop himself from turning all the pegs.

    But I’ve seen two little friends really bloom into loving their Suzuki violin and guitar lessons, respectively, and I know Oscar is a bit jealous of them.   Finally I hit on a temporary solution:  the recorder.

    I knew already that any lessons before age eight, I wanted to do in the traditional Suzuki method.  (In that method, the parent begins by taking lessons herself with the child present; later, the parent and child take lessons together.  Also, the pieces are learned by memory at first rather than introducing note-reading, and attention is paid from the beginning to beautiful tone production.)  I hear that many Suzuki teachers in the U. S. have given up on getting parents to take lessons with their kids, which is too bad.  It sounds like fun to me!

    But with a little bit of research, I discovered that we could probably learn the recorder together, at home, with some self-discipline on my part.   There are many advantages:

    • The instrument is inexpensive — five dollars for one that looks and sounds sufficently important and impressive to a kindergartener.  I bought four!  (Now I need to buy some even cheaper ones for my toddler to play with.)
    • It’s also highly portable and easy to care for.
    • It’s simple enough that, because I can already read music well and my ear is reasonably well trained, I can learn the basics myself pretty quickly.
    • The Suzuki books and CD are available for the recorder, as are a number of other resources (see, e.g., this one.)

    I spent some time interviewing my two friends, the parents (respectively) of the little violin and guitar students, about their lessons:  what happened on the first day, how the lesson goes, what the kids learned first, how many pieces they learn at a time, how long they take to learn a piece, what skills are covered in what order.  I learned that the "syllabus," so to speak, is highly dependent on the instrument itself.  For example, the boy learning guitar learned how to hold his guitar and play a note right away; the girl learning violin spent a whole month just learning how to hold the bow.  The first pieces learned, too, are carefully chosen to complement the skills needed to learn to hold the instrument and produce good tone.  I also learned a few details, e.g., that the student learns to "take a bow" at the end of every lesson and practice, and that the family is supposed to play the CD as much as possible at home.

    Then I turned to the Suzuki book, which had some basic messages for the beginning student and instructor, and tried to figure out from the order of the early pieces how one would proceed.  As far as I can tell, you start by covering up most of the holes with tape, and the first lessons are about producing the difficult low notes without squeaking, which requires the learner to work from the start at blowing gently.  (Most other recorder methods begin with the "easy" higher notes.)   Pieces of tape are removed one at a time as the student learns fingering, but in the very beginning he can focus on breathing and tone production.

    I’m listening to the CD (which has harpsichord and viol backup, and sounds very cool and medieval).  I’m also working my way through the first few pieces, and Oscar is begging to be allowed to have "his" recorder, which is still locked away in the cabinet, or at least to be allowed to hold mine.  A little anticipation is good for him, I think. 

    I plan to do a "lesson" once a week and practice daily, just as if we were doing traditional lessons.  I’ve no illusions that without an instructor I’ll be able to reproduce the "real" Suzuki method, but I’m hoping I can approximate it and at least learn whether Oscar needs to be signed up for outside lessons or whether he even really would want to.  I’ll write more about this as we go.


  • A lovely surprise.

    A joyful surprise arrived in my e-mail box on St. Patrick’s day.  Our friends K. and E., who are Milo’s godparents (and we’re the godparents of their son who’s the same age as Milo) sent the news that they had their second baby early that morning — very fast, unexpectedly on their apartment’s bathroom floor!

    As I read E.’s (the dad’s, that is) brief account, I hooted with joy (and laughter) for them.  He described it as "amazingly smooth" and "much smoother and easier" than the (hospital) birth of their first.  I had encouraged them to look into homebirthing when they were first pregnant.  They interviewed one or two  homebirth midwives and decided against it.  Surprise!  I can’t help but grin like a maniac.  I’m so happy for them.    

    K.’s labor was two hours and nine minutes long, from the very first contraction — and it really was the first, she says, there wasn’t any prodromal stuff  — up to the moment E. caught the baby.   E. sent a photo that their boys’ aunt took just before the paramedics arrived.     In the picture K. is getting ready to nurse the baby boy, who is wrapped in towels.  She looks as if she was just about to lift her sweatshirt to latch him on when someone said, "Smile!"  She is grinning from ear to ear — she looks gorgeous, radiant.  The baby’s chin is up, searching.  He is chubby-cheeked and pink, with dark hair. 

    I went over later with some red raspberry leaf tea (it’s all I had in the fridge!) and heard more of the story.  The worst part, according to K., was riding in the ambulance after the delivery, to get the newborn tests at the hospital.  Even though they’d both been up for hours and hours and hours, they were glad to see me, wanted to talk, and too excited to sleep.  Especially E. the dad, who was exhiliarated and thrilled, obviously, but still had a kind of deer-in-the-headlights look about him!  (My godson the toddler, on the other hand, was very tired and near meltdown, so I didn’t stay long.)   

    E. showed me the digital pics from just after the birth, which included many shots of firefighters posing while holding the swaddled, sleeping baby.  "That guy’s the rookie," E. told me, pointing to a young-looking man made burly-looking by the big firefighter coat.  "This is only the second fast birth he’s been to."  Really?  And the others?  "Well, let’s see.  The driver said he’d been to more than thirty.  And the others had all been to a bunch too."

    I have a feeling that this happens more often than people realize, despite the near-heroic language used to describe unexpected home births in local news stories.  I looked into planned unassisted home birth, quite seriously, for some time before each of my previous pregnancies.  We wound up both times hiring a midwife (who is a wonderful match for us — very hands-off and gentle) , but I learned enough to know that most of the time, particularly if there are a lot of interventions, particularly in the hospital, an attendant is more likely to create a problem than to solve one.    The best attendants stay out of the way and let birth unfold on its own. 

    Which is probably one reason why fast labors, the kind that happen on bathroom floors (provided the mother is healthy and the infant is full term), seem to be comparatively problem-free and fairly smooth.    Google for local news stories about fast unplanned home births and read them.  I just did.  Some of them mention aspects that were obviously perceived as alarming by the parents — and, crucially, by the reporter writing the story — but that happen commonly and aren’t necessarily really problems:  e.g., "the baby was born with the cord wrapped around his neck."  (So was E. and K.’s baby.  E. unlooped it.)

    The other reason why fast labors (again, provided the baby is full term)  may go well is simply that a fast labor is almost by definition one that’s working really smoothly.  Problems slow it down, don’t speed it up, you know? 

    Actually, most of the last two paragraphs is just my perception, plus my memory of having read all that somewhere, perhaps in Emergency Childbirth:  A Manual by Gregory J. White.  The data about the safety of unplanned home births of healthy babies is pretty hard to come by.  It seems that most people who study home birth safety lump planned and unplanned home births together (probably because they mine the data from birth certificates), and the few who have separated them lump preterm and fullterm deliveries together. 

    Anyway, I went home from K. and E.’s house with a new thrill in my heart, the kind that always leaps up when I am lucky to be near a new baby with a gentle birth story, that birthglow I guess.  Throughout my own pregnancy, almost 20 weeks now, I’ve been oddly detached, maybe too busy to think about it much.  Seeing this new little person asleep in his daddy’s arms has got me feeling pregnant again, in a good way, and wanting much more to meet my own new little one, who’s only just starting to make Little One-self known to my senses. 

    I got home and told Mark, "I’m jealous.  I wish that would happen to me."  (Come on folks, even you fans of hospital birth!  She had fewer than 15 contractions, none of them closer than five minutes apart!  Wouldn’t you?)

    He said, "Oh, so it’s ‘I’ll have what she’s having,’ is it?"  He paused for a beat and added, "You can’t have what she’s having."

    Postscript:  I gave E. my copy of Emergency Childbirth for a present inscribed "Great job!"  (I was in too much of a hurry to write anything smarter than that.)  Guess I’ll have to get another copy for myself.


  • Night weaning, continued.

    Milo fell asleep while Mark was reading the boys a bedtime story, and Oscar soon after the lights out, so Mark wriggled out from between them and moved over next to me, leaving the boys snuggled together. 

    Sometime in the middle of the night I heard Milo stirring, then whimpering.  Uh-oh, I thought.  Might have to get up for this one.  A moment later he whimpered more loudly, and then I heard his little voice croaking, "Miiiiiiiiilllk."

    I waited a moment — sometimes he says one word and goes back to sleep — and then there was the thump of his feet on the floor.  I opened my eyes and started to get up, but Mark beat me to it.  "Hey sweetie, where you going?"

    Big thump. 

    Pause.

    "Are you just going to sleep there on the floor?"

    Whimper.

    "Come back to bed.  Come on.  Snuggle your dad." 

    Mark picked him up — "There, there" — and lay down with him, and instantly Milo’s breathing went slack and he was fast asleep.  The whole episode lasted maybe four or five minutes.   I think he’s going to be sleeping reliably through the night within a couple of weeks.


  • Seen written on the wall of the women’s restroom in the coffee shop this morning.

    First writer:     I’M HOT.

    Second writer:  I’M HOTTEST.

    Third writer:  Damn!  You should look into hormone replacement therapy.


  • Paternal opt-out.

    DarwinCatholic has some good commentary on a news article I’ve been meaning to mention.

    …in the man’s case, US law recognizes a traditional understanding of what sex is (an act that can naturally be assumed to be fertile) while in the woman’s case sex is merely considered an act which may bring on a transitional condition in which a woman has conceived yet has not yet decided whether or not she wants to actually be pregnant.

    Clearly, being pregnant (and caring for a child) is a far, far greater burden for a woman than for a man, so one can see how (thinking with its heart rather than its head) our country got itself into this position. But it’s still a pretty untenable position to be in.

    Obviously, it would be wrong to deny child support and parentage to children in order to be "fair" to the men who fathered them.  So in that respect, the lawsuit mentioned in the article is reprehensible.  On the other hand,  it highlights the illogical position we find ourselves in.   

    (And it points out that biology isn’t "fair" in the same sense that laws can strive to be "fair."  Must we apply "fairness" to situations that are inherently biologically "unfair"?  That’s a question that’s more general than just this one….)

    Unfortunately, if a court decided that, to be fair, laws must either allow fathers to opt out or cut back on abortion-on-demand, I have a feeling that many groups would choose to lobby for abortion over child support.


  • Dinner conversation, the day after a snowstorm.

    Me:      Was it helpful that I partially shoveled the walk today?

    Mark:  Um, a little bit.  In some of the places you shoveled a few feet to the left of the sidewalk. 

    Me:  Well, I wasn’t doing it for you.  I thought the mailman would appreciate it.

    Mark:  Yeah, he probably did.

    Me:   Sorry that shoveling the top layer of snow away made me too tired to do any housework or cook the dinner except to make the salad.  How is the salad, by the way?

    Oscar (picking at it):  You shouldn’t mix the salad dressing into the salad.   You should leave it in a bowl on the table so I can put more dressing on.

    Me:  I guess I just can’t please anybody today!

    Mark:  Except the mailman.


  • 3 AM linking.

    Sometimes, when you come downstairs for a sandwich at three in the morning and sit down to surf while you eat it, you come across an unusual gem.

    Thanks to a link at Asymmetrical Information, which was interested in the economics of his situation, I have discovered Thomas Mahon.  His blog, English Cut, is surprisingly fun to read.  In brief, Mr. Mahon is a relatively young top-shelf bespoke tailor of Savile Row (though his workshop is based in Cumbria, keeping his overhead low).  He blogs about the suits he’s working on, the trips he takes to meet clients in the US and on the Continent, what "bespoke" means, tips on how to use a thimble and sew a proper button, what’s so special about his particular shop, and how to tell a tailor from a cutter in the bars near Savile Row.   

    From this post about a trip to the US:

    I love meeting and making for all my customers. But there’s always that little extra joy when a customers try on on his first bespoke suit. It could be the successful young executive who’s just realized that bespoke REALLY IS as good as they say (Frankly, if it wasn’t, I couldn’t realistically stay in business). Or sometimes it’s the guy who’s decided that before he dies he’s going to have at least one real suit in his wardrobe. It’s a great moment to witness.

    And this bit, from a post explaining the three methods that tailors might use to create a bespoke pattern:

    ["Rock of Eye"] is the system I specialise in. This is where the second system, the above Drafting Formula is calculated mentally in my head, however I just cut the pattern freehand, using only my tape measure and chalk to guide me. This method is used for the jacket only- to draught trousers without a square and stick would be folly.

    This method does sound slightly vague, because it is. However as Mr. Hallbery told me, on my first encounter in the Anderson & Sheppard cutting room, “Show me a right angle on a man and I’ll let you use that square”.

    It’s a fun blog.  Read some more.


  • Snow day!

    It is really coming down — and sometimes sideways.  There are maybe seven inches of snow on the ground.  Driven snow encrusts the screens on the kitchen windows; we can’t see the birdfeeders only six feet away.  MnDOT has asked Minneapolis residents to curtail unnecessary travel, Mark reported when he called me from his car (me: Why are you calling me while you are driving?!?  him:  I’m only going two miles an hour!) to suggest that I stay home.

    The original plan for the day was busier than usual:

    8:00 get kids up

    9:00 leave for music class

    10:15 drive to Melissa’s, about 20 minutes into the suburbs

    1:30 drive to a different suburb for Oscar’s class at a nature center

    3:30 come home

    Now it looks like we’ll be home all day, unless it clears up by early afternoon and the nature center isn’t closed.  I wonder, should we do schoolwork and housework as we might if it were Tuesday (one of my at-home days), or should I say "Snow day!" and let Oscar sleep in, turn on cartoons, make canned soup and hot chocolate, for lunch, maybe send them out galumphing in the heavy, wet, springtime snow until they come back in soaked to the skin?

    Maybe a little bit of both.  If I can find any mittens, that is.