Wow. Is that really only one ukulele?
H/t First Things (7/14/06).

bear – ing n 1 the manner in which one comports oneself; 2 the act, power, or time of bringing forth offspring or fruit; 3 a machine part in which another part turns [a journal ~]; 4 pl comprehension of one’s position, environment, or situation; 5 the act of moving while supporting the weight of something [the ~ of the cross].
Wow. Is that really only one ukulele?
H/t First Things (7/14/06).
—
|
"One in eight babies now is born prematurely." By that they mean, before the end of the 37th week of gestation.
Personally, I’m curious how many of those are born early because of maltimed unnecessary inductions or scheduled c-sections. The article alludes to that possibility when it suggests one way to combat premature birth:
[The Institute of Medicine recommended that m]ore pregnant women receive a first-trimester ultrasound exam, the only way to be certain of the fetus’ exact age. That’s particularly important if the woman later has labor induced or a Caesarean section before her due date, either elective or because of a possible health problem.
Fair enough, except for that "the only way to be certain" bit. Somebody’s never heard of fertility awareness. Granted, it’s unrealistic from a public-health standpoint to recommend that "more women who may become pregnant track their basal body temperatures," but that’s no excuse for the inaccuracy here. And incidentally, do we really want to go the route where ultrasounds in the first trimester are considered a routine and necessary part of prenatal care? OTOH, it may be a reasonable choice for women who are at risk of preterm labor.
And then there’s the artificial conception connection:
Specialists should strengthen guidelines that reduce the number of multiple births as a result of infertility treatment. During in-vitro fertilization, doctors often implant several embryos at once into a woman’s womb. That number has been dropping thanks to guidelines from the American Society of Reproductive Medicine, issued in 1999 and tightened in 2004 — and triplet-and-higher multiple births have dropped, too.
I’m glad for those guidelines, especially if it means that fewer embryos will be created and tossed in the haz-waste bin. Doesn’t make it right, but reduces the harm by a small bit. I wish people would stop calling this "infertility treatment" though.
But it won’t be easy to follow the example of some European countries that implant just one embryo at a time, said Dr. William Gibbons, president of the Society of Assisted Reproductive Technology. Those countries also pay for women to undergo multiple IVF attempts, while very few American women have insurance coverage for a procedure that can cost more than $15,000 per try, he noted.
"If we want to buy into this, society needs to buy into it," said Gibbons — who added that parts of Europe also found they saved money on treating preemies even after paying for repeated single-embryo IVF attempts.
Bleah. They’d probably save more money if they didn’t pay for any IVF attempts. I’m sure the folks at the SART would love to have the taxpayers and insurance customers foot the bill for IVF. Fifteen thousand bucks for an elective procedure that doesn’t relieve any condition?
Matthew at the Shrine has a fascinating article on legends of the Holy Grail.
Typepad had a systemwide glitch on Wednesday, June 12. If you posted a comment yesterday it may have been lost. I only know of two lost comments — one by me and one by James — and as far as I know they can’t be recovered. Sorry.
Two posts by Jimmy Akin on Wednesday that exemplify clear explication of Church teaching in specific circumstances. Both are responses to questions sent in by readers.
In one post, Jimmy lays out the rules for choosing godparents. I like it because with the last four short paragraphs he sums up the different possibilities concisely and accurately.
In the other post, Jimmy begins with a question about whether failure to take heart medication counts as "suicide," explains the significance of intention in coloring self-destructive acts and non-acts, and deftly goes on to explain how, as medical technology has evolved, the ethical test of which medical treatments may be refused has itself evolved from "ordinary or extraordinary means?" to "proportionate or disproportionate means?" Along the way he pauses to define "proportionalism" and to show how considering proportionality is not the same thing as falling into that moral error.
I just think they’re great examples of question-answering. See for yourself.
"If two plus two were six, counting by twos would be different."
Rod Dreher asks a good question at the Crunchy Con blog.
I’m 39 years old, and the sort of person to resort quickly to anger at the previous generation for so thoroughly trashing our heritage, especially within the Catholic Church. But as is often remarked, things wouldn’t have collapsed so suddenly within 1960s Catholicism in the US and Europe if everything had been okay in the 1950s. I guess I’m not really interested in wasting any more energy deploring the revolutionaries, and instead want to understand what made them revolutionaries so that those of us whose task it is to rebuild from the ruins they left us don’t make mistakes that could lead our children and grandchildren to such a suicidal backlash.
Any ideas? Was the 1960s-1970s upheaval in the U. S. Church just part of the general, whole-culture zeitgeist, or was there something sinister lurking in 1940s and 1950s style Catholicism specifically? Something that the 60s-70s people were trying to correct, and wound up overcorrecting?
This morning about ten-thirty I buckled my five-year-old and two-year-0ld into their car seats and started off to Melissa’s house via a fairly busy north-south surface route. As I approached an intersection I saw a brown car pull partway out from the right, stop, pull a little farther, stop again. It caught my eye and as I drew closer I saw there was a young woman, barefoot, her hair unkempt, kneeling on the hood of the car. I couldn’t make out what she was doing but she looked like she was shouting at the driver.
Rather than drive across the car’s path, I hit my brakes. What the — ? My hand reached into my bag and fumbled for my cell phone, but didn’t find it before the car pulled out in front of me, tires squealing, turning left across me, the woman still clinging to the hood of the car, turning her head this way and that as if it see where he was driving. My windows were open. I didn’t even think about it. I shouted out the window at the woman, "Hey! Are you okay?"
The car screeched to a stop, facing the opposite way. The woman came down off the hood, or maybe she fell when the car stopped, and opened the passenger door. She looked up at me for an instant; I repeated my question; she nodded and got in. Then the driver’s side door opened, and the man who was driving put a foot out and turned towards me and began to yell abusive words at me, started to get out of the car. I whipped my head around and put the pedal to the floor. Behind me in the rear view mirror I saw the car making a three-point turn, and I realized he was going to follow me. I had no idea what he planned to do if he caught up with me. I didn’t want to find out. My two kids were in the back seat. I’m eight months pregnant.
I sped down the street — no one was in front of me really — and turned right at the next intersection, taking me into a residential neighborhood. Vaguely I remembered reading somewhere that, if someone’s tailing you, you should make a series of quick successive right-hand turns. I never really thought about it, but now that I’ve done it, it makes a lot of sense. For one thing, a couple of consecutive right turns rules out the possibility that it’s only a coincidence that the same car is following you. And that’s what happened — fast. Two right turns and in the rear view mirrow the car was still behind me, tires squealing around the corner. It was hard to turn the wheel as fast as I wanted, because even with the seat as far back as it goes and the wheel tilted up, the bottom of the wheel digs into my pregnant belly.
I slowed just enough to make a third right turn without losing control of the car, blowing through a stop sign and stomping the accelerator all the way down to the floor, passing houses and trees, and hoping that no pedestrians stepped into my path. (That’s another good reason to make right turns. If you’re going to careen illegally through an intersection, it’s the move least likely to cross another’s path.) The car was still behind me, and could see me, when I made the fourth turn, back onto the busy street I started on and heading the same direction. I thought there was a chance that the guy was far enough behind me that I could make another turn while I was still out of sight, and at that moment a left turn opened up.
There were people in that intersection, which had a coffee shop or something like that on the corner, but they were all on their way out of it and I thought I had a clear path. I leaned on the steering wheel and shot through that intersection. Didn’t hit anyone. Bystanders on the sidewalk turned and shouted angrily at me. I wish I could go back and apologize. Couldn’t, just then. I didn’t know if he’d seen me or not. I had a few more turns to make.
I blew through three or four more stop signs, this time making random turns, glancing fearfully up at the rearview mirror, but he didn’t appear again. I made my way to another neighborhood, finally slowing down for the stop signs, and eventually I was sure I had lost him.
I drove the rest of the way to Melissa’s house in a near stupor. When I pulled into her driveway and reached for the ignition, I was surprised to find the radio was on. I didn’t remember the sound of the radio. I was unable to calm down for the rest of the day. Kept wondering if it was possible that the guy got my license plate number and could track me down, find my house. I know it’s not likely but the fact that it’s not entirely impossible kept nagging at me.
It’s no wonder, really, that people don’t get involved when they see a bad situation unfolding in front of them. I assume that what I stumbled upon was some kind of domestic-violence incident. The way the driver of the car started and stopped it in jerks. The blank look she gave me, nodding I’m okay, as she got into the car. When I saw her there on the roof of a car with its tires squealing as it rounded a turn, all I saw was She’s in trouble. I didn’t really stop to think, Somebody in that car is causing her a lot of trouble, and he could cause me trouble too. If I had, maybe I wouldn’t have shouted. Who knows if it did more harm than good, even to her situation, whatever it was?
Anyway, it’s over, we survived, my beat-up ’93 Oldsmobile cornered better than his beat-up whenever whatever, and no, officer, I didn’t get the licence plate number, I was too busy getting myself and my kids the hell out of there. Just wanted to let you know in case something else happens later, so you know if there’s a pattern. But I’m still shaken, I will be for a few days at least, and I don’t know if I’ll stop the next time something happens in front of me like that.
To unschool, or to school-at-home? Jamie at Selkie has an interesting compromise: Be "scheduled" homeschoolers from from August to November and from January to April, and be "unschoolers" during Advent and Easter. Go, read.
I like to combine schooling and unschooling too, but I’ve done it on a subject basis, so to speak. So far (only one kid-year accomplished), we’ve "schooled" math, reading, and religion, and we "unschool" everything else. My plan for next year is to introduce some semi-schooled art and history as well. By semi-schooled I mean that I have some artwork and some historical biographies I’m specifically going to introduce at specific times throughout the year; but those are only springboards, and we’ll just see where they lead us.
I don’t write a lot about the Crusades. My formal education in history was poor and incomplete, so although I have a sense from my general reading that the conventional wisdom about them is somewhat off, I wouldn’t dare try to do any debunking myself.
However, even I can see the ridiculous error in this Washington Post piece, pointed to by Get Religion, about conflicts between Muslims and Christians in the nation of Turkey:
The tension dates at least to the 13th century, when Christian Crusaders sacked what is today Istanbul.
"What is today Istanbul." Hm. Why do you think they didn’t say what it was in the 13th century? Could it be because the name might clue us in to something… important? As I’ve said before on this blog, thank goodness for They Might Be Giants:
Istanbul was Constantinople
Now it’s Istanbul, not Constantinople
Been a long time gone, Constantinople
Why did Constantinople get the works?
That’s nobody’s business but the Turks
Ah, that was fun. What is today Istanbul was, at the time the Christian Crusaders sacked it, not Istanbul at all but rather Constantinople. Ring a bell yet? Let’s look at a timeline shall we? Follow this link to the Wikipedia article and look at the right side of the page. Highlights:
330 – Constantine makes Constantinople his capital. (Remember Constantine? The Christian emperor?)
1054 – Schism. Split between Church in Rome and Church in Constantinople.
1071 and following: Several notations about the loss of Byzantine Christian cities to conquest by Turks, i.e., Muslim invaders. However, Constantinople is not among them. It remains an Eastern Christian city. Hence, it is still called Constantinople, recalling that long-ago Christian emperor.
1204 – Constantinople conquered by Crusaders. This is the 13th-century sacking referred to in the article. Who sacked whom? Western Christians sacked Eastern Christians. Now, you tell me, as Get Religion pointed out — how is this the source of the tension between Christians and Muslims in modern Turkey?
1261 – Constantinople reconquered by Michael Palaeologus, Byzantine emperor of Nicaea. OK, now the Eastern Christians have gotten Constantinople back.
1453 – Ottoman Turks (i.e. Muslim invaders again) conquer Constantinople.
After that, it was called Istanbul. But it wasn’t called that when Christians sacked it. Because it was Christian too. Do you think perhaps it might be more accurate to say that tensions between Muslims and Christians date to the 15th-century sacking of what was then Constantinople by the Ottoman Turks?
Maybe, if the 65,000 or so Orthodox Christians in Turkey were attacking the 35,000 or so Catholics in Turkey, that might make sense…
A few weeks ago, I decided to try making pancakes once a week. I’d always thought of them as a "special" breakfast, and a not-very-healthy one, but a little research and practice showed me that (a) they’re actually quite easy, and quick enough to make on a weekday, and (b) if you make whole-grain pancakes, they’re not unhealthy at all — assuming you go easy on the syrup.
I fine-tuned my recipe over the course of several weeks. Perfection was reached when I finally bought one of those big two-burner nonstick griddles; now I can make the whole family’s pancakes in two or three batches. I also discovered that itsy-bitsy pancakes, dipped in a dish of syrup and eaten out of hand, are far less messy for the two-year-old than they would be if you involved a fork and knife.
So here is the recipe, just enough for my family of four if you add some sausage and eggs for those who want ’em. You can vary the proportions of flour, buttermilk, and egg to get the thickness you want. (Really, the recipe’s quite robust; you can add all kinds of things to the batter, from spices to nuts to berries to chocolate chips.)
The night before, mix whole wheat flour and buttermilk in a batter bowl. Cover and let soak at room temperature overnight.
In the morning, mix in remaining ingredients. Thin with milk or buttermilk if desired. Ladle onto hot, ungreased nonstick griddle to make any size pancakes. When small bubbles appear on top, turn with spatula. Cook until golden brown. Keep warm in 200-degree oven for up to 30 minutes.
Soaking the flour overnight makes the pancakes much softer, more like a white-flour pancake would be. Also, supposedly, overnight soaking breaks down compounds in whole grains that can inhibit nutrient absorption. Because of the "good cultures" in the buttermilk or yogurt, the mix shouldn’t spoil on the countertop, but if it worries you you could put it in the refrigerator; if you’re going to do that, you might want to soak it for longer, perhaps 24 hours. And it’s convenient that it takes exactly half a container of buttermilk; so we buy a quart every two weeks.
My family has really come to enjoy the tradition of "Wednesday Pancakes." I had no idea that my husband could put that many pancakes away at one sitting (undoubtedly his family won’t be surprised to hear that, but let’s face it, I’ve made more pancakes in the last seven weeks than in seven years of marriage).
I did discover one downside though — last Wednesday I must have needed a little more sleep, and didn’t wake up when Mark’s alarm went off. There’s really no place I have to be on most mornings, so it’s not such a big deal for me to sleep in till the kids wake up. Only Mark actually shook me awake before he got out of bed. At first I thought perhaps he was hoping to get a bit romantic, but then reality struck: "You’re waking me up so I’ll go down and make pancakes for you, aren’t you?"
"Well, yes."
Unintended consequences. My family likes the pancakes so much, now they expect the pancakes.
Major milestone today: Mark and I slept in our bed last night, all night, with the kids in a different room. Both of them. First time since Oscar was born almost six years ago.
We set up the double bed in the tiny second bedroom in preparation for the impending birth of New Baby — it’s good to have extra beds around, because who knows which kids will be asleep where while I labor?
But now that there’s a bed in there, we’ve been putting Milo down to nap in it, and calling it the "boys’ bedroom." And we moved the basket of bedtime stories into that room too. Mark’s been snuggling down with them for story time, and asking, "So, should we sleep here tonight?" Oscar’s ready, but Milo’s always said no. So all three of them trooped back into the family bedroom, which is crammed full with our first queen-sized bed and the twin bed we bought when I was pregnant with Milo.
A few evenings ago Oscar fell asleep in the car and we put him down to sleep in the boys’ bedroom. He woke at three and we brought him back. But last night, both of them fell asleep in the car. We put them down next to each other, left the hall light on, and went to bed in our own room, with no one to keep us company but the kicking baby in my belly. Rather nice for a change!
The light was streaming through the windows before they woke up. I listened, entranced, to a sound I’d never heard before: the muffled sounds of my children’s voices as one woke the other up on the other side of a wall. I couldn’t make out any words. I did hear giggles. I heard Oscar get out of bed, go to the bathroom, flush the toilet, return to the boys’ bedroom. I thought about how much fun it is to wake up with the children and talk and giggle with them for a few minutes while lying in bed. I wished that I could hear what they were saying to each other. Maybe I could install a baby monitor or something? And then I thought: No — I don’t always have to eavesdrop. Let them enjoy being brothers together.
Of course, it wasn’t long before they sneaked into our room and jumped on the bed. "Wake up mama, wake up daddy," chanted Milo. And then — really! — the two of them absolutely plastered us with kisses and hugs. Milo hugged and kissed me while Oscar hugged and kissed Mark, and then Oscar hugged and kissed me while Milo hugged and kissed Mark, and then they put their hands on our faces and gazed adoringly at us, and then they switched places and did it all again.
Who knows whether this will happen again soon or not? I don’t know. I don’t care — I like having them with us, and I like them sleeping together in the next room too. I’m glad they’re together with each other and don’t need to sleep alone. I have no idea how long it’ll be before they willingly "go down" in the other room, instead of being carried there unconscious. But I believe I’ll remember this Fourth of July for a long time.

Recent Comments
Recent Posts
Categories
…more to come later