bearing blog


bear – ing n 1  the manner in which one comports oneself;  2  the act, power, or time of bringing forth offspring or fruit; 3 a machine part in which another part turns [a journal ~];  pl comprehension of one’s position, environment, or situation;   5  the act of moving while supporting the weight of something [the ~ of the cross].


  • Tagged with the birthday meme.

    Rich Leonardi tags me:

    The Rules:

    1) Go to Wikipedia.
    2) In the search box,
    type your birth month and day but not the year.
    3) List three events that happened on your birthday.
    4) List two important birthdays and one death.
    5) One holiday or observance (if any).

    Events:

    1582 – Due to the implementation of the Gregorian calendar this day does not exist in this year in Italy, Poland, Portugal and Spain.   

    I first read that in a "Big Book of Facts" I had as a kid and it always fascinated me.  Everyone went straight from October 4th to the 15th.

    1921 – Baseball: The World Series was broadcast on the radio for the first time.

    It figures.  In my family, when I was growing up, we had a tradition that on yor birthday, you got to ride in the front seat of the car, you got to have your favorite food for dinner, and you got to choose what the family watched on TV that evening.  Except I never got to pick the TV show
    because the playoffs were always on.  Boo hoo!  (Well, it seemed like a horrible injustice at the time.)

    1969 – The first broadcast of Monty Python’s Flying Circus.

    Speaking of TV, this is a milestone, don’t you agree.

    Births: 

    • 1882 – Robert Goddard, American rocket scientist (d. 1945)
    • Václav Havel, playwright and President of the Czech Republic

    (what, you wanted I should highlight Teresa Heinz Kerry?)

    Deaths:  1938 – Saint Faustina Polish religious (b. 1905)

    As of 2000, my birthday is her feast day. 

    I’d like to count that as the "holiday," but if I can’t, I’m stuck with International World Teachers’ Day.  Give your favorite teacher a Certificate of Redundancy Certificate for that one!

    Tag: Valerie, Meira V., DIH


  • The horror of canon-law footnotes.

    Ed Peters makes it simple, with his solaranite-powered guide to the footnotes of the 1917 Code.

    Be sure to check out the captions:

    When attempting to acquire a new skill, whether it’s making scary claw-hands or deciphering citations to Gratian’s Decree, try to find someone with experience who can show you how to develop your skill more quickly and accurately.

    And the Latin jokes, too.


  • Motion and meaning.

    Rich Leonardi handily predicts that a bishop’s pastoral visit to Africa will result in commentary praising liturgical dancing.  Then he posts a picture of silly American liturgical dancers.

    Just because liturgical dance is silly here doesn’t mean it isn’t good in other places.  Conversely, the existence of truly worshipful liturgical dance in other countries, if it indeed exists, does not make it a good idea in American parishes (except maybe those composed largely of immigrants from places of the former type).

    Liturgical dance done here doesn’t spring from the heart of our culture as a genuine act of worship. It’s imposed on us.

    That’s a big difference.

    Nor do we recognize any kind of body motions that we could call "dance" as signifying any sacredness.

    And it’s not because "the church recognize[s]" that "people were going to move their body and that was going to lead them into sin," as someone said once, and as Rich quotes them in another post.

    We do have body motions that we recognize as sacred or that we invest with meaning. You can tell their authenticity in our cultural context by seeing where they are copied, outside of church, by people wanting to import an air of the sacred.

    Think of the solemn procession (much used in civil ceremonies, graduations, etc). Think of the sign of the cross and its resemblance to, say, placing your hand over your heart to honor the flag. Think of the ringing of bells. Or rising from your seat in the presence of a respected person.

    These aren’t cultural signifiers of the sacred because they are used in church.  They are used in church because they signify the sacred.


  • WARNING: THIS INFANT CARSEAT IS NOT INTENDED TO PROTECT INFANTS FROM THEIR OWN PARENTS’ IDIOCY.

    I attend a weekly Music Together class with my three children, ages 6, 3, and 4 months.  I like the mixed-age group, the low-pressure environment, the well-trained instructors.  I like the format, which allows the toddlers to express themselves, experiencing the music, with lots of whole-body motions like jumping, running, rolling balls, dancing with scarves, playing rhythm instruments.  It’s boisterous, yet the instructor’s skill keeps it "all about the music."  I love it.

    The last two weeks, however, have been a nightmare.

    Two new babies are in the class, one MJ’s age, the other born a few weeks ago.  Their mothers each have a toddler as well.  Clearly the mothers believe the class is for the toddlers, not the babies (although the class is expressly for ages birth through five years).  Last week, both of those babies’ moms left their infants strapped in carseats in the middle of the floor, often getting up to dance around the room with their toddlers.

    Imagine six boisterous toddlers and preschoolers running around the room, pretending to be airplanes or kangaroos or something, also three or four moms, while two little babies sleep in the center of the room, defenseless, "like little oysters on the half shell," as my friend put it when I described it to her.

    Not only that, but there were RHYTHM STICKS.  And BALLS. 

    Why couldn’t those mothers see that this is dangerous?  Do they think that the car seat is magically protective on the floor?  Do they think the handle is a roll bar?  Do they think the other children will remember that the carseat, which looks for all the world like an inanimate object, contains a tiny human being?

    Milo, my three-year-old, is pretty boisterous.  When the teacher says, "Let’s run around the room!" he doesn’t jog, he goes at full speed, colliding with the walls.  I occasionally have to take him out of the class to remind him not to throw things.   That’s a normal part of learning to respect others. 

    But this class was a nightmare.  The parents are, reasonably, responsible for our own children’s behavior towards others.  If Milo knocks into a one-year-old, the worst that’s going to happen is a bruise.  I can make him apologize.  I can take him out of the class if I have to.  But if he gets overexcited even for a moment — which is hardly unexpected in a class like this — and knocks over one of the carseats, the newborn inside could be seriously hurt.

    I had to keep a grip on him the whole time because I was afraid he would run into one of the carseats.  When it was time for rhythm sticks, he did throw one once, and I had to take him away.  I had to take him out of the room again when it was time for ball-rolling, because I know from experience that he will forget he is not supposed to throw the balls. 

    We’ve been doing this class for nearly three years, and I have encountered the babies-in-carseats problem before.  My strategy has always been to sit right next to the baby.  Then I can point the baby out to my children, remind them constantly to be gentle, and also can serve as a human shield if need be.  (Why the babies’ mothers do not do this is beyond me, but the fact is, they do not always stay by the carseat.)

    Last week’s class was the first time there was more than one baby on the halfshell, and so I could not protect them both at once.   

    I went up to both moms after class and apologized profusely for the near misses — Milo, by far the most physically energetic kid in class, had run past their baby’s carseats several times.  My hope was that (a) they would forgive me for not keeping better control over him (I tried, but recall that I have a new baby myself, who is IN MY ARMS during class) and (b) they would get the hint that the baby was not safe in the carseat in the class.

    It gets better.  Yesterday’s class, I planned to arrive early to talk to the instructor, who is in all ways excellent and who owns the business.  The instructor was not there and a substitute was teaching.  One of the two mothers kept her son in arms during the class (whew).  But the other mother still had her brand-new little girl in the carseat.  When she saw my concern that Milo was going to collide with her child, she said to me, "Don’t worry, I’ll put her where she’ll be safe."

    So she got the baby out of the seat and snuggled her in her arms, singing songs to her all through the class.

    No wait, that’s not what happened.

    Actually, she picked the carseat up by its handle, with the baby still strapped inside, and placed it up on top of a half-wall, four feet high and barely wider than the carseat, that separates the dance room from the coat room.  Where it teetered all through the class.  I could not look at it without imagining some child throwing a ball at it and knocking it down, baby and all, onto the hard linoleum floor.  Or some dancing mother tripping over a dancing toddler and careening headlong onto it.  Or my own 6-year-old son trying to peek into it (he could reach it) and knocking her off the wall.

    It gets better!  On the other side of the wall, just below where the mother left her baby, is a combination boot bench/slide that the children always climb on while their mothers are getting their coats.  I forgot about that till class was over and I came out into the anteroom.  I sat on the bench to keep children off it.  The mother got all her winter gear on and all her toddler’s winter gear on before she came to get the baby.

    "Oh, excuse me," I said cheerfully, as I got up.  "I was blocking your baby."

    "Oh, that’s all right," she said with a friendly smile as she grabbed the handle and took the baby down from her precarious perch.   "You’re not in my way."

    She still didn’t get it!

    After I got back to a computer I composed an e-mail to the instructor/business owner begging her to formulate a "no carseats in the class" safety policy.  More when I hear back from her.


  • Do you think they meant “kugel?”

    Best Google search of the day:  Someone got to my site by Googling

    kegel with chicken fat

    Sounds… squishy.


  • Reader question

    What religious items, images, icons, etc. are on display in your home, and where? 

    I’m late in getting my few items out of the attic, and thinking about getting some more this year, and looking for inspiration.  The St. Therese photo I saw in an acquaintance’s home a few weeks ago has got me thinking!

    (Answer in the comments, and don’t be shy, as I can never get enough comments!)


  • Don’t underestimate what’s going on here.

    Pope Benedict meets with Ecumenical Patriarch Bartholomew of Constantinople. 

    Today, I dare to hope we will see reunion in my lifetime.

    Although it has all of Byzantium’s history behind it, the Church of Constantinople is tiny today, shrinking under the pressure of Turkish civil law.  They cannot freely choose their leaders; their seminary is closed; they cannot own their church buildings; recently the Christians even lost the cemeteries that house their dead.  They fear justly that they will die out entirely within a generation or two.  Which makes all the more urgent our efforts and prayers to join together again.

    Constantinople holds a kind of primacy among the Orthodox churches.  If Constantinople and Rome can rejoin… perhaps full union is possible.

    See patiarchate.org for much, much more.


  • Is Jimmy Akin on a roll or what?

    All this week I’ve barely been able to keep up.

    For my few readers who aren’t familiar with him, Jimmy Akin — yes, the cowboy hat guy — is a Catholic writer and apologist.  His blog is the best place I know to go for extremely detailed, technical, practical, and correct answers to all kinds of questions about Catholic beliefs, practices, and morality. 

    In my view, he answers questions like an engineer, or perhaps a mathematician, often laying out the list of all possible answers or arguments and then systematically destroying them one after another until only a few remain, at which point he announces (one way or another) that the speculation is about to begin, and then proceeds to reason his way through them.   He never lets an ambiguous term slip by without definition, and if he needs to appeal to Church documents he goes straight to the Latin. (For a sample, see his Moral Theology category)

    Another thing I like is his willingness to write at length about hypothetical and fictional scenarios, as in this response to the recent reader question "Would it be just under Catholic teaching to commit genocide against the Cylons?"

    This week he’s writing about torture (start here and read forward), the topic of which has been bandied about the Catholic blogosphere of late (notably by Mark Shea) and which has suffered a bit from a lack of definition of terms.

    There’s also some writing about the Pope’s visit to Turkey.  Also about Benedict’s upcoming book about Jesus.  Good stuff.  Check it out

    More about JA.


  • Yiddesotan.

    Desperate Irish Housewife, a New Yorker transplanted here (and who is a member of my parish), is having trouble with the local dialect of Yiddish.

    What’s really going on is a common malapropism.  Yiddish words for "penis" seem especially prone to this for some reason. 

    So as a public service, here’s a link to a glossary of Yinglish


  • St. Therese on charity.

    A few days ago I wrote that I had recently re-read St. Therese’s memoirs.  Here is an example of the kind of "little acts performed with great love" that make up St. Therese’s little way, from her autobiography.

    Imperfect souls…are treated, it is true, with the measure of politeness which
    religious life demands; yet their company is avoided, lest a word
    might be said which would hurt their feelings. When I say
    imperfect souls, I am not referring to souls with spiritual
    imperfections only, for the holiest souls will not be perfect till
    they are in heaven. I mean those who are also afflicted with want
    of tact and refinement, as well as ultra-sensitive souls….


    From all this I draw the conclusion:–I ought to seek the
    companionship of those Sisters towards whom I feel a natural
    aversion, and try to be their good Samaritan. A word or a smile is
    often enough to put fresh life in a despondent soul. And yet it is
    not merely in the hope of giving consolation that I try to be
    kind. If it were, I know that I should soon be discouraged, for
    well-intentioned words are often totally misunderstood.
    Consequently, not to lose my time or labour, I try to act solely
    to please Our Lord, and follow this precept of the Gospel: "When
    thou makest a dinner or a supper, call not thy friends or thy
    brethren, lest perhaps they also invite thee again and a
    recompense be made to thee. But when thou makest a feast, call the
    poor, the maimed, the blind, and the lame, and thou shalt be
    blessed, because they have naught wherewith to make thee
    recompense, and thy Father Who seeth in secret will repay thee."

    …I remember an act of charity with which God inspired me while I
    was still a novice, and this act, though seemingly small, has been
    rewarded even in this life by Our Heavenly Father, "Who seeth in
    secret."

    Shortly before Sister St. Peter became quite bedridden, it was
    necessary every evening, at ten minutes to six, for someone to
    leave meditation and take her to the refectory. It cost me a good
    deal to offer my services, for I knew the difficulty, or I should
    say the impossibility, of pleasing the poor invalid. But I did not
    want to lose such a good opportunity, for I recalled Our Lord’s
    words: "As long as you did it to one of these my least brethren,
    you did it to Me."    I therefore humbly offered my aid. It was
    not without difficulty I induced her to accept it, but after
    considerable persuasion I succeeded. Every evening, when I saw her
    shake her sand-glass, I understood that she meant: "Let us go!"
    Summoning up all my courage I rose, and the ceremony began. First
    of all, her stool had to be moved and carried in a particular way,
    and on no account must there be any hurry. The solemn procession
    ensued. I had to follow the good Sister, supporting her by her
    girdle; I did it as gently as possible, but if by some mischance
    she stumbled, she imagined I had not a firm hold, and that she was
    going to fall. "You are going too fast," she would say, "I shall
    fall and hurt myself!" Then when I tried to lead her more quietly:
    "Come quicker . . . I cannot feel you . . . you are letting me go!
    I was right when I said you were too young to take care of me."

    When we reached the refectory without further mishap, more
    troubles were in store. I had to settle my poor invalid in her
    place, taking great pains not to hurt her. Then I had to turn back
    her sleeves, always according to her own special rubric, and after
    that I was allowed to go.

    But I soon noticed that she found it very difficult to cut her
    bread, so I did not leave her till I had performed this last
    service. She was much touched by this attention on my part, for
    she had not expressed any wish on the subject; it was by this
    unsought-for kindness that I gained her entire confidence, and
    chiefly because–as I learnt later– at the end of my humble task
    I bestowed upon her my sweetest smile.

    Dear Mother, it is long since all this happened, but Our Lord
    allows the memory of it to linger with me like a perfume from
    Heaven. One cold winter evening, I was occupied in the lowly work
    of which I have just spoken, when suddenly I heard in the distance
    the harmonious strains of music outside the convent walls. I
    pictured a drawing-room, brilliantly lighted and decorated, and
    richly furnished. Young ladies, elegantly dressed, exchanged a
    thousand compliments, as is the way of the world. Then I looked on
    the poor invalid I was tending. Instead of sweet music I heard her
    complaints, instead of rich gilding I saw the brick walls of our
    bare cloister, scarcely visible in the dim light. The contrast was
    very moving. Our Lord so illuminated my soul with the rays of
    truth, before which the pleasures of the world are but as
    darkness, that for a thousand years of such worldly delights, I
    would not have bartered even the ten minutes spent in my act of
    charity.

    …I have not always felt these transports of joy in performing acts
    of charity, but at the beginning of my religious life Jesus wished
    to make me feel how sweet to Him is charity, when found in the
    hearts of his Spouses. Thus when I led Sister St. Peter, it was
    with so much love that I could not have shown more were I guiding
    Our Divine Lord Himself.


  • Self-defense.

    The Agitator is the go-to place for reading about the developing story in Atlanta, where an innocent elderly woman was shot and killed by the police who were breaking down her door when she, thinking they were criminals, tried to defend herself.

    No-knock warrants ought to be illegal except in the narrowest of circumstances, and in regular searches the "knock" ought to be a real knock, followed by a pause, not muffled shouts of "Police!" while the door is bashed in.  It’s not surprising that officers get shot at in these situations.  Any idiot can yell "Police" while he tries to break into a house.  We can start by applying strict liability to the police — that should reduce the number of mistakes.

    Anyway, I bring this up because yesterday in the Twin Cities area, an elderly man successfully defended himself against a home invader.  Good for him.   It’s the occasional news item like this that keeps the rate of home invasions down in the United States.

    A 73-year-old Coon Rapids man was at home alone Monday night when he heard the sounds of a break-in on the first floor and minutes later faced an intruder in his second-floor bedroom.

    Gerald Whaley told police he fired one shot.

    Police today are trying to identify the intruder who died of a single gunshot wound, in what appears to be a case of self-defense….

    [Captain Robert] Aldrich [of the Anoka County Sheriff’s Department] said it does not appear police will recommend charges against Whaley. But the final decision will be the Anoka County Attorney’s, Aldrich said.

    "You are in your own house," Aldrich said. "You have a right to defend yourself and protect yourself."

    That’s what I like to hear from law enforcement.  Reality check:  the first line of defense is the individual, whether the idea fits our political leanings or not.


  • Not very helpful.

    We’ve had a Netflix subscription for a few months, courtesy of a smart friend who gave it to us for a new-baby present.   I just now got around to going through the "Get Recommendations" process, which starts by offering you a selection of movies to rate; when you’re done, supposedly, it analyzes your taste and offers you a wide variety of movies that their computer thinks you’ll like.

    So I did that (making a few adjustments such as "I love children’s movies," given that most of what we get is for the kids), and then it listed for me 14 "best bets" and 14 "movies you’ll like more than most people do."

    So much for a wide variety. Every one of them is a compilation disc of episodes of Doctor Who.

    Not too useful, except perhaps as an "Interesting Fact About Myself" to use in icebreaker games.